diy solar

diy solar

Possible increase of heart attack risk after mRNA vaccine.



Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart. Not sure if has to do with "heart attacks" but the cdc has some info.

"Reported cases have occurred predominantly in male adolescents and young adults 16 years of age and older. Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose."
Just a little tidbit here .... I think it was reported earlier that the FDA is slow walking release of the data they used to certify the Pfizer Covid shot .... they reviewed 329,000 pages of documentation in 108 days, but say it will take 55 years to release the data to the public ..... so far they have released only 91 pages.
I have attached 1 of those pages.
This is adverse events from getting the vaccine.

The swine flu vaccine was discontinued after 25 deaths being reported.

View attachment 74183
You just happened to be paging through your vast supply of medical journals and study data? Someone's been visiting antivax sites. Funny you didn't post about how these changed all of our lives:
1796 smallpox. 1885 rabies. 1890 tetanus. 1896 typhoid fever. 1906 TB. 1923 diphtheria. 1926 whooping cough. 1932 yellow fever. 1937 flu. 1952 polio. 1963 measles. 1967 mumps. 1969 rubella. 1974 chickenpox.




https://twitter.com/mhdksafa/status/1466046280023564297
 

FDA added the warning back in June apparently. I didnt even know all this was being looked at by two major agencies as an actual issue till after this thread...hopefully more data comes out that concludes the risks for young people are insignificant. I guess more data will come as the agencies are keeping a close eye on the developments.
 
If you are 40 years old or younger and have never had respiratory problems, getting vaxed is more dangerous than not.
This nonsense of forcing vaccinations needs to stop. Let the most vulnerable get vaxed and leave the rest of us alone.

1638460929211.png
 

FDA added the warning back in June apparently. I didnt even know all this was being looked at by two major agencies as an actual issue till after this thread...hopefully more data comes out that concludes the risks for young people are insignificant. I guess more data will come as the agencies are keeping a close eye on the developments.
Yes this was discussed in all the approval hearings. The recommendation is to let, especially young males, know this is a possibility. The myocarditis has been transient and rarely symptomatic. They know about it primarily because of testing. Important to remember that many infections also cause myocarditis and Covid in particular does. Remember that inflammation is part of our body's immune response and the purpose of vaccines is to trigger immune response so the body is ready when the real thing comes along.
 
If you are 40 years old or younger and have never had respiratory problems, getting vaxed is more dangerous than not.
This nonsense of forcing vaccinations needs to stop. Let the most vulnerable get vaxed and leave the rest of us alone.

View attachment 74202
Absolute lie/ No source for your primary quote,
 
Absolute lie/ No source for your primary quote,
Of course not.... probably got it from Quacks_R_US dot com...

Some people are gullible enough to believe anything.. you're not going to fix that.
 
Yes this was discussed in all the approval hearings. The recommendation is to let, especially young males, know this is a possibility. The myocarditis has been transient and rarely symptomatic. They know about it primarily because of testing. Important to remember that many infections also cause myocarditis and Covid in particular does. Remember that inflammation is part of our body's immune response and the purpose of vaccines is to trigger immune response so the body is ready when the real thing comes along.

The risk of myocarditis was assessed by cdc as well for covid19 Vaccination. But with the virus, the chances were much greater of inflammation in older cohorts. The younger people DID have cases of heart inflammation after infection, but at a much lower rate. Would it be the same percentages for the vaccine? Not sure if that info is out yet, but it's being watched closely, especially in younger cohorts as their overall risks are so low from the virus comparatively.
 

The risk of myocarditis was assessed by cdc as well for covid19 Vaccination. But with the virus, the chances were much greater of inflammation in older cohorts. The younger people DID have cases of heart inflammation after infection, but at a much lower rate. Would it be the same percentages for the vaccine? Not sure if that info is out yet, but it's being watched closely, especially in younger cohorts as their overall risks are so low from the virus comparatively.
I suspect the number is lower than this but here is an example. https://www.usnews.com/news/health-...e-big-ten-athletes-diagnosed-with-myocarditis
 
People arent getting forced vaccinations.
Thousands did before the executive order was blocked in court. I was forced to take the J&J vax.
Have the democrats rescinded it and changed their minds ? No.
And federal employees had to meet a deadline a few days ago.

Once the CDC defines "fully vaccinated" as requiring a booster, then booster shots will be mandated.
They can't force me because I'm retiring.
That probably won't stop democrats.
They want people to show a vax card to be able to buy food !
 
Thousands did before the executive order was blocked in court. I was forced to take the J&J vax.
Have the democrats rescinded it and changed their minds ? No.
And federal employees had to meet a deadline a few days ago.

Once the CDC defines "fully vaccinated" as requiring a booster, then booster shots will be mandated.
They can't force me because I'm retiring.
That probably won't stop democrats.
They want people to show a vax card to be able to buy food !
It becomes an issue of societal burden. Who should bear the burden of that portion of society that refuses to get vaccinated? Is it the vaccinated or unvaccinated? An unvaccinated person in that instance still has the right to be unvaccinated but should that come at the expense of those that fully cooperate with societal expectations. Should their be some limitations on the unvaccinated when it comes to public spaces especially during break outs? Is it the immunocompromised and elderly OR the unvaccinated that should carry the consequences of their decision? They get the benefit why shouldn't they pay the price? The unvaccinated, of course, want it all. F Everyone. That is not how a healthy society works.
 
Thousands did before the executive order was blocked in court. I was forced to take the J&J vax.
Have the democrats rescinded it and changed their minds ? No.
And federal employees had to meet a deadline a few days ago.

Once the CDC defines "fully vaccinated" as requiring a booster, then booster shots will be mandated.
They can't force me because I'm retiring.
That probably won't stop democrats.
They want people to show a vax card to be able to buy food !
Yea, I suppose every employer treats their employees differently, or employees agree to different things upon employment. I personally know a federal employee of one of the top law enforcement agencies in the country, who for whatever personal reason does not want the vaccine, has not been "forced" and will not be fired for their decision.

Sounds to me it wasnt a "forced vaccination", but perhaps a condition of employment.

I help a neighbor sell food, so far he hasn't heard of anything nor would comply with that ridiculous theory.
 
It becomes an issue of societal burden. Who should bear the burden of that portion of society that refuses to get vaccinated? Is it the vaccinated or unvaccinated? An unvaccinated person in that instance still has the right to be unvaccinated but should that come at the expense of those that fully cooperate with societal expectations. Should their be some limitations on the unvaccinated when it comes to public spaces especially during break outs? Is it the immunocompromised and elderly OR the unvaccinated that should carry the consequences of their decision? They get the benefit why shouldn't they pay the price? The unvaccinated, of course, want it all. F Everyone. That is not how a healthy society works.
Hopefully a better vaccine can be released in the future that actually "stops the spread" and infection rates. Vaccination rates are high, not 90, not 80. but generally some 60-70%. Unfortunately the data doesnt show that these vaccines in their infant stages have been able to stop transmission and infection. I figure most everyone that could get vaccinated with current technology or wanted to, or even didnt want to but did anyway because of a perceived "force" of some kind, already has been vaccinated. Aside of course the lowest age group.
 
Where is this actually happening? I have NEVER been asked for my vax card for anything.
It isn't. He is making shit up again. It is laughable to think people would be forced to starve to death if they didn't get a vaccine... unless of course you live in his bubble of conspiracy theories and all opinions started strongly enough are considered facts! What people don't realize is that this whole thing is meant to alienate the true hero conservatives of this country, and make them outlaws! Once they are branded with this stigma they can be rounded up, arrested, and all of their guns can be confiscated! Once they are forced to get vaccinated with the microchip trackers, there will be swat teams ready to descend on any gathering of them larger than 10, and all ammunition and gun stores will have chip readers to track and refuse them sales!
 
Aside from all that odd and unbelievable stuff, the article is only about international travel.
 
Why do you do this to yourself? You've been accused of getting your news from facebook, blogs, and Instagram, and then you decide to regurgitate a tidbit that has been going around for a while. The lack of detail and confusion about facts makes it obvious.


Was that the phrasing used on the facebook post?

If by slow-walking you mean the standard release rate, yes.


Are you sure this isn't a list of adverse events that came after vaccination? You do understand the basic concept that correlation is not causation, right? If someone gets hit by a car after they get the vaccine, it doesn't mean the vaccine had magnets in it to suck the car to them.

Didn't think it was worth posting the details? That this was the 1976 swine flu, that it was actually discontinued due to ~ 500 cases of GBS out of ~ 80 million vaccinations, and since the flu only killed one person that year they discontinued while they looked into whether GBS was being caused by the vaccine? Who needs details when you have tidbits! Right? Easier to digest and then regurgitate on others.

I'm sure you weren't trying to slip anything by the fine people reading this thread, just willful ignorance and the desire to perpetuate any story that feeds the narrative you have married yourself to.
The page I posted is one of the 91 pages the FDA has released so far .... It's hard to put it in context because for some reason, they redacted the page before that one that showed how how many vaccines had been administered at that time .... but it was part of the documentation Pfizer submitted to the FDA for the approval process ... and the FDA had it for over 3 months before they did the approval.
I really don't understand why the FDA would redact the information that would put this chart in context ..... none of the reasons that come to mind are good.

So ... If you don't want to accept the data ... that is fine with me ..... If you do some research, you can probably validate this for yourself instead of off handedly dismissing it like anything else you guys find inconvenient.
If the outlets where you get your news doesn't have any of this information .... you might want to ask yourself why.

I won't engage any further concerning this ..... just wanted to post this for anyone that might actually be interested in information.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top