diy solar

diy solar

The vaccinated are more likely to catch Covid

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Israel is back down; now the UK is up.
My point is the vaccinated are catching Covid. This is not a situation where the unvaccinated are the problem.
The problem IMHO is we are not treating everyone early
Yes more vaccinated people are presenting. However 30% of the population are unvaccinated and the last I see the unvaccinated still make up 60% of the hospitalizations.
Simple google search. If you have a better link feel free to post it up.
 
Finally, thank you, thank you. This study has cleared fraud review and although all desired protocols were not followed, this is one that should be placed in the basket for Ivermectin. There is nothing dramatic going on here as no one is dying and the endpoint of the study is viral clearance (they no longer measure virus in testing). So, there is a 9.7-day clearance with ivermectin vs 12.7 without. It is something. As the study itself says: "Larger trials will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings." What is confusing about the study is that when they give doxycycline (an antibiotic) with ivermectin then there appears to be no benefit to ivermectin. So this is one that generated more interest and future studies were done. Thank you. That is a start. Is it enough to say ivermectin should be used? No. Is it enough to say we should study ivermectin more? Absolutely. The other thing about these early trials is that they are taking place in Bangladesh and South America etc,. There is nothing wrong with that but we always need to remember that this is heavily wormy, parasite-prone, land. There is no doubt ivermectin is extremely effective at killing parasites. Does that influence these findings? So this study confirms the NIH statement that the results are inconclusive and we need larger-scale studies. Agree? Disagree? anyone? At least we are in the meat of it rather than blogs.
There are other studies underway and will be producing their findings soon. One of the major pitfalls in science today is funding. It is in the interest of the investigative body to find the conclusions desired by the people who are funding them. That is why there is so much conflicting information that has put everyone at each other's throats. It is a sad state of affairs.
 
You don't see how illogical it is to deny access to a medicine that for all practical purposes, doesn't have side effects ?
They aren't going to grant access to it. Not until we either win back congress or the presidency.
It's 100% political.
Generic Prozac will likely be approved as an early treatment. Budesomide, otc, previously known as Rhinocort, also being used. FDA will not block access. These drugs will be especially helpful in poorer countries. Note that BMcl claims an FDA conspiracy but ivermectin is not an approved treatment in most of the world. By the way BMcl, Budesimide can be taken rectally which you may enjoy. Your name being BM and all.
 
One of the major pitfalls in science today is funding.
You mean this money? The former guy that is going to save us 15% on everything?

Trump gave an agency $100 million to fight Covid. Here’s what happened.​


"A federal agency that was run by a college friend of Jared Kushner and assigned $100 million to spend on fixing the Covid supply chain crunch has so far failed to invest a single dime, according to a new government watchdog report."

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/trump-gave-agency-100-million-fight-covid-s-happened-rcna5692
 
There are other studies underway and will be producing their findings soon. One of the major pitfalls in science today is funding. It is in the interest of the investigative body to find the conclusions desired by the people who are funding them. That is why there is so much conflicting information that has put everyone at each other's throats. It is a sad state of affairs.
Yes. It is worse than ever especially since fringe (popup) medical journals can get immediate attention from the media with a lack of training in research standards and the less scrupulous will use these studies to their advantage. There are withdrawn studies with proven fraud still being discussed online. There is now a team of scientists specifically dedicated to following up on all studies and requesting underlying data. If it is not produced or has inconsistencies they notify publishers. This has been the source of some recent withdrawals. Study funding has been a longstanding issue and needs to be considered but the outright fraud going on now is a whole new ballgame.
 
You mean this money? The former guy that is going to save us 15% on everything?

Trump gave an agency $100 million to fight Covid. Here’s what happened.​


"A federal agency that was run by a college friend of Jared Kushner and assigned $100 million to spend on fixing the Covid supply chain crunch has so far failed to invest a single dime, according to a new government watchdog report."

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/trump-gave-agency-100-million-fight-covid-s-happened-rcna5692
This reminds me. BMcl is a huge fanboy of disgraced Grenada-educated, Milwaukee (now fired) doctor Pierre Kory. Well, it turns out that Jared Kushner and Pierre Kory were emailing each other to discuss national Covid policy. Kory was taking ivermectin prophylactically which he tells everyone works perfectly but both he and his daughter came down with Covid. This is true but anecdotal evidence only. See how unfair and misleading it can be BMcl?
 
You don't see how illogical it is to deny access to a medicine that for all practical purposes, doesn't have side effects ?
They aren't going to grant access to it. Not until we either win back congress or the presidency.
It's 100% political.
There is a difference between denying access and recommending. I've said this numerous times but you can get this drug prescribed to you. You point out hospitals that don't advocate it or allow it while ignoring the fact you can still get access to it.
 
There is a difference between denying access and recommending. I've said this numerous times but you can get this drug prescribed to you. You point out hospitals that don't advocate it or allow it while ignoring the fact you can still get access to it.
If anyone had the patience to actually read this thread they would see BMcl constantly shifting positions. His arguments get pounded down and then he reappears with a modified version or just repeats the same thing OVER and OVER.
 
A significant area of concern is how the vaccine interacts with the immune system .... particularly those who already have an autoimmune condition.

One area of concern that is being studied is that people who take immune suppressing drugs for their autoimmune condition ..... this is about 40 million people in the US .... the vaccine simply may not work because it doesn't get a response from the suppressed immune system.
That concern is outline here ... https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/boosting-vaccine-response-autoimmune-disease

Another area of concern is that because of the mechanism of the vaccine it may actually cause autoimmune conditions. The case for that concern is outlined here .... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833091/

This is just one example of why the current message .... get vaccinate or else .... get the booster or else .... doesn't necessarily fit with a large portion of the population.

It is REALLY a good idea to keep giving boosters and then more boosters or might there be serious long term effects of this strategy?

We shouldn't be acting as if the vaccine is a one size fits all solution. I have an autoimmune condition myself (I don't have to take immunosuppressant drugs) ..... I have a brother and an Aunt who do have to take immunosuppressant drugs.
Hence, the desire to find other mechanisms that may help prevent and early treat Covid.

Health officials need to stop pretending that the vaccine is a one size fits all solution and trying to force companies to fire people if they don't get in line. Thank goodness the Osha thing has been put on hold thru litigation .... I liked the quote earlier about an awakening of common sense. You don't need to be an immunologist to recognize that a lot of what is going on doesn't pass the smell test.
 
I know a person that stopped the suppression drugs for several weeks so the booster would work. Immune response will be tracked and soon back on the drugs. It is a two edged sward because the immune system is at a disadvantage to fight covid due to the drugs.

Of course BMcL wants us to just let these people go. I do hope new treatments are available soon. However I believe in tested proven results. Until then a booster every 6 to 24 months is the path I believe in.

I believe there are medical exemptions to the vaccine mandate depending on the actual situation. The religious exemption is just a bunch of political crybabies.
 
A significant area of concern is how the vaccine interacts with the immune system .... particularly those who already have an autoimmune condition.

One area of concern that is being studied is that people who take immune suppressing drugs for their autoimmune condition ..... this is about 40 million people in the US .... the vaccine simply may not work because it doesn't get a response from the suppressed immune system.
That concern is outline here ... https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/boosting-vaccine-response-autoimmune-disease

Another area of concern is that because of the mechanism of the vaccine it may actually cause autoimmune conditions. The case for that concern is outlined here .... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833091/

This is just one example of why the current message .... get vaccinate or else .... get the booster or else .... doesn't necessarily fit with a large portion of the population.

It is REALLY a good idea to keep giving boosters and then more boosters or might there be serious long term effects of this strategy?

We shouldn't be acting as if the vaccine is a one size fits all solution. I have an autoimmune condition myself (I don't have to take immunosuppressant drugs) ..... I have a brother and an Aunt who do have to take immunosuppressant drugs.
Hence, the desire to find other mechanisms that may help prevent and early treat Covid.

Health officials need to stop pretending that the vaccine is a one size fits all solution and trying to force companies to fire people if they don't get in line. Thank goodness the Osha thing has been put on hold thru litigation .... I liked the quote earlier about an awakening of common sense. You don't need to be an immunologist to recognize that a lot of what is going on doesn't pass the smell test.
How do you get 40 million?? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/05/210520133846.htm
 
This thread is really unproductive and has run it's course.
I think we have all had this same argument with friends and relatives and gotten nowhere. I just don't see anybodies position changing on a forum if you cannot convince them in person.

My personal observations is that once a person is vaccinated they no longer have an issue with the Vaccine and they move over into the other camp or just don't care to argue anymore. Those who have not been Vaccinated cannot be persuaded by any type kind of prodding or dialog. The only time they change their minds is when someone who is healthier, younger and close to them dies of Covid. Sadly I have seen way to much of that.
 
If you read the NIH articles I linked, it was in both of them.
There is no there-there in these articles. The prescribing literature for ALL vaccines says those with immune-related conditions should consult with their physicians. Bob tries to make the second article something scary and new but it simply ends with this recommendation. "Given the current state of the art, my view is that individuals with a dysfunctional immune response should receive the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine only if the benefits of this approach clearly outweigh any risks and after a careful evaluation case by case.' This falls in the "No duh" category. Again, this advice apply to ALL vaccines. for those that do not want an mRNA vaccine, the Johnson and Johnson is available and many more traditional vaccines are on their way.

Conceptually, your immune system exposed to a vaccine is the exact same as being exposed to the actual Covid virus (without the getting severely ill and dying part). The entire point of a vaccine is to simulate getting the virus. Vaccines do not protect you as so many comments imply. Your immune system protects you. The vaccine is gone within 72 hours.

There are immunosuppressed people and that is exactly the population that the rest of us should be getting vaccinated and wearing masks inside for.
 
This thread is really unproductive and has run it's course.
I think we have all had this same argument with friends and relatives and gotten nowhere. I just don't see anybodies position changing on a forum if you cannot convince them in person.

My personal observations is that once a person is vaccinated they no longer have an issue with the Vaccine and they move over into the other camp or just don't care to argue anymore. Those who have not been Vaccinated cannot be persuaded by any type kind of prodding or dialog. The only time they change their minds is when someone who is healthier, younger and close to them dies of Covid. Sadly I have seen way to much of that.
This is right, however, misinformation should not be allowed to stand unchallenged.
 
I know a person that stopped the suppression drugs for several weeks so the booster would work. Immune response will be tracked and soon back on the drugs. It is a two edged sward because the immune system is at a disadvantage to fight covid due to the drugs.

Of course BMcL wants us to just let these people go. I do hope new treatments are available soon. However I believe in tested proven results. Until then a booster every 6 to 24 months is the path I believe in.

I believe there are medical exemptions to the vaccine mandate depending on the actual situation. The religious exemption is just a bunch of political crybabies.
I don't mind boosters but I remain hopeful that this third booster may do the trick. With new viruses, we won't know until we know however, in reading Dr peter Hotez and some immunologists they remain cautiously optimistic the third shot could do it, absent a very different variant. The rationale is that with many vaccines you need to give a number of them spaced apart. Those of us with children and pets are aware of this. The initial vaccines were not spaced very far apart so this may not have maximized the full potential of the vaccines. Just hopeful.
 
This thread is really unproductive and has run it's course.
I think we have all had this same argument with friends and relatives and gotten nowhere. I just don't see anybodies position changing on a forum if you cannot convince them in person.

My personal observations is that once a person is vaccinated they no longer have an issue with the Vaccine and they move over into the other camp or just don't care to argue anymore. Those who have not been Vaccinated cannot be persuaded by any type kind of prodding or dialog. The only time they change their minds is when someone who is healthier, younger and close to them dies of Covid. Sadly I have seen way to much of that.

If you are referring to my post ..... I HAVE been fully vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine .... and I'm not arguing against the vaccine in general .... I am, however struggling with the idea of taking booster shots in perpetuity.
I am just trying to point out that people should be treated as individuals .... We aren't all the same. The solution for people taking immunosuppressant drugs may NEED to be different. There are people with other health concerns where this is true also.

I have seen your posts as more reasonable .... not just pot shots that try to put down another person. Sorry to see you leaving the thread.
 
If you are referring to my post ..... I HAVE been fully vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine .... and I'm not arguing against the vaccine in general .... I am, however struggling with the idea of taking booster shots in perpetuity.
I am just trying to point out that people should be treated as individuals .... We aren't all the same. The solution for people taking immunosuppressant drugs may NEED to be different. There are people with other health concerns where this is true also.

I have seen your posts as more reasonable .... not just pot shots that try to put down another person. Sorry to see you leaving the thread.
Do you, loved ones, or family take yearly flu shots? Same difference, maybe it’s the speed that this new Covid reality washed over the earth. i just got my booster and flu shot, went on with my day no drama. Talking about immunosuppressed people like they are just now dealing with medical issues and choices like this is odd.
 
Like calling someone a killer who says good things about ivermectin ?
You make horrendous overstatements about ivermectin. You attribute simple procedural approval mechanisms and delay to worldwide conspiracy. You never cite authorities---simply blogs, youtube etc. You reassert things continuously even when disproven. You have never dug into the merits in any discussion. Your ivermectin praise is tied to vax denying and objecting to common-sense approaches like masking. You do not care about the health of others and say so openly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top