For Land based PV installs:-
A connection to earth of any of the current carrying d.c. conductors is not recommended. However,
earthing of one of the live conductors of the d.c. side is permitted, if there is at least simple
separation between the a.c. and the d.c. side. Where a functional earth is required, it is preferable
that where possible this be done through high impedance (rather than directly).
Connecting to earth is a very complex duscussion and many have opposing opinions. I have pasted the guidelines from our "PV Land" installs here in the UK. Please feel free to digest and comment.
Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems
38
2.2 Design Part 2 – Earthing, Protective Equipotential Bonding and Lightning
Protection
2.2.1 Lightning Protection
Whilst this installation guide does not cover specific guidance on selection, or application of
lightning protection, it was felt that a brief overview was required as given below. Where further
information is required, this can be referenced from BS EN 62305.
In most cases the ceraunic value (number of thunderstorm days per year for a given installation
location in the UK) does not reach a level at which particular protective measures need to be
applied. However where buildings or structures are considered to be at greater risk, for example
very tall, or in an exposed location, the designer of the a.c. electrical system may have chosen to
design or apply protective measures such as installation of conductive air rods or tapes.
If the building or dwelling is fitted with a lightning protection system (LPS), a suitably qualified
person should be consulted as to whether, in this particular case, the array frame should be
connected to the LPS, and if so what size conductor should be used.
Where an LPS is fitted, PV system components should be mounted away from lightning rods and
associated conductors (see BS EN 62305). For example, an inverter should not be mounted on an
inside wall that has a lightning protection system down conductor running just the other side of the
brickwork on the outside of the building.
Where there is a perceived increase in risk of direct lightning strike as a consequence of the
installation of the PV system, specialists in lightning protection should be consulted with a view to
installing a separate lightning protection system in accordance with BS EN 62305.
Note: It is generally accepted that the installation of a typical roof-mounted PV system presents
a very small increased risk of a direct lightning strike. However, this may not necessarily be the
case where the PV system is particularly large, where the PV system is installed on the top of a tall
building, where the PV system becomes the tallest structure in the vicinity, or where the PV system is
installed in an open area such as a field.
2.2.2 Earthing
Earthing is a means of connecting the exposed conductive parts to the main earthing terminal,
typically this definition means the connection of metallic casings of fixtures and fittings to the main
earthing terminal via a circuit protective conductor (cpc).
Importantly, it must be noted that we only make this connection when the accessory or appliance
requires it. This connection is required when it is considered to be a class I appliance or accessory
and is reliant on a connection with earth for safety using ‘automatic disconnection of supply’ (ADS)
as the fault protective measure.
Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems
39
As the d.c. side of PV systems is a current limiting generating set, the protective measure ADS is
almost never used and is outside of the scope of this guidance. In these circumstances, where the
d.c. side of the installation is constructed to meet the requirements of an installation using double or
reinforced insulation, no connection to earth between the PV Modules or frame and main earthing
terminal would be required.
Earthing of the inverter at the a.c. terminations will still be necessary where the inverter is a
Class I piece of equipment and must be applied where necessary. Where class I inverters are used
externally (ie field mount systems) careful consideration must be given to the requirements for
earthing.
2.2.3 Protective Equipotential Bonding
Protective equipotential bonding is a measure applied to parts of the electrical installation which,
under fault conditions may otherwise have a different potential to earth. By applying this measure
the risk of electric shock is limited as there should be little or no difference in voltages (potential
difference) between the parts that may otherwise become live. These parts are categorised as either
Exposed-Conductive-Parts or Extraneous-Conductive-Parts
In most PV systems there are no parts that are considered to be an exposed-conductive-part or
extraneous-conductive-part, therefore protective equipotential bonding is not usually required. For
guidance on when to consider protective equipotential bonding please see the decision tree on the
next page.
On the d.c. side of the PV installation the designer will have usually already selected double
or reinforced insulation as the protective measure and therefore the component parts of the
installation will be isolated and will not require protective equipotential bonding.
Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems
40
Earthing and or Bonding Decision Tree:
5 1
Earthing and/ or bonding of PV array frames
Is the d.c. side of the installation constructed to meet the requirements for an
installation using double or reinforced insulation as a protective measure?
Is the PV array frame an extraneous
conductive part
Is the array frame an exposed
conductive part ?
No protective
equipotential
bonding required
Protective equipotential
bonding as defined in
BS7671 should be applied
Earthing should be
applied if required
by BS7671
YES
YES YES
NO
NO
NO
Fig 10
Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems
41
2.2.4 Determining an Extraneous-Conductive-Part
The frame of the array has to be assessed as to whether it is likely to introduce a potential into the
installation. This aim of this assessment is to find out if the frame has any direct contact with ground
that would make it introduce a potential.
The details on carrying out these tests are best given in the IET BS 7671 Guidance Note 8 Earthing
& Bonding and this should be referred to before undertaking a test. The principle behind the test is
to ascertain whether or not there is a low enough conductivity between the part under test and the
Main earthing terminal (MET) to say that it could introduce an earth potential.
To find this out a resistance test should be carried out between the part in question (the array
frame) and the MET of the building. Where the value recorded is greater than 22kΩ (most cases)
the part can be considered to be isolated from earth and NOT an extraneous conductive part. If
however the reading is less than 22kΩ, then the part is considered to be extraneous and protective
equipotential bonding, as required by BS 7671, should be applied.
Where the array frame is mounted on a domestic roof or similar, the likelihood of the frame being
an extraneous-conductive-part is very low - due to the type and amount of material used between
the ground and the roof structure (which will mainly be non-conductive). Even in the case of an
array frame being mounted on a commercial building where mostly steelwork is used, it is likely that
the frame will be either isolated, and therefore not required to be bonded, or will be bolted to the
framework or steelwork of the building which will often be sufficient to maintain bonding continuity
and a sufficiently low enough resistance to consider it to be bonded through the structure itself.
Careful consideration needs to be given to systems that are ground mounted as they may initially
appear to be an extraneous-conductive-part. However, as they are usually a good distance away
from the earthed equipotential zone, by bonding them you may well be introducing a shock risk that
wasn’t there initially, and in the case of an installation supplied by a TN-C-S (PME) supply you may
be contravening the supply authority’s regulations (ESCQR 2002). In most cases these installations
wouldn’t require bonding – in such cases the designer must make an informed decision based on the
electrical design of the entire installation, not just the PV system in isolation.