My case is similar and I think I have decided to run multiple 18kpv units instead as I cannot see any practical benefit to the Gridboss system in my case. I would still have to install a blade style disconnect as the POCO could care less about the breaker style disconnect in the Gridboss. I will have to swap out all 3 of my 200A breaker style disconnects at my service entrance now, and the same is true if I used the Gridboss. If I were to use multiple inverters per each 200A service, then a gridboss could take the place of a combiner panel for paralleling the units, although a $200 panel vs a $2500+ Gridboss again seems pointless.
The only feature I like is the ability to use the built in bypass transfer for inverter maintenance. If you can mount the unit close enough to any homeruns, then you can utilize the smart ports and that would be another benefit I cannot use. My service entrance is 200 feet from the nearest main panel for the home. I have no plans to have the inverters or batteries or solar inputs any closer than that to the home anyway, so the smart ports are useless. For the inverter bypass I will install a manual transfer switch to each inverter (still half the cost of a Gridboss) and then repurpose my existing 200A breaker style disconnects to interrupt the feed to the "Load" side of the 18kpv should I need to flip the transfer switch and bypass an inverter for some reason.
I'm thinking one 18kpv per 200A service, one blade style disconnect outdoors in place of the original breaker style disconnects and in the event of a grid outage, have a few select smart breakers over in the home main panel drop out the dryer or ovens or one water heater, so on and so forth as needed, should the usage stack up by others in the house to avoid the need for paralleling inverters to handle worst case peak events WHILE the grid is down and unable to provide that short-term peak loading.