srudin
New Member
We have a solar hot water system and use it for about 3 years now. The main parts are a German tank, a Chinese panel and a Chinese controller. It was installed by a local company in Chiang Mai (Thailand) and worked quite reliably so far. Please note that the tank and the panel are at very close distance on the same (ground) floor, maybe 2-3m of pipe for each connection (in/out).
A few months ago we exchanged the controller to a wifi model that I can connect to my HASS system. It works pretty much the same as the previous one but allows me to remote control and automate the system as well as collect some data.
Now this collected data is somewhat confusing me. Let me show a number of graphs that I got out of our system:
---1---
Looking at graph 1 I see more or less what I would expect: After sunrise the panel (T1) heats up and triggers the pump; after every pumping cycle the tank (T2) gets a bit hotter. However, the graph flattens slightly down - meaning that the hotter the water gets, the less the heat increases in the tank per pumping cycle. Oh, and please ignore the temperature increase between 2-3pm, that is the integrated heating module.
---2---
Looking at graph 2 I see the opposite of what I would expect: After sunrise the panel heats up and triggers the pump; but after every pumping cycle the tank gets a bit COOLER (?!). Only after around 10 pumping cycles it starts to slightly heat the tank.
Please note that the main difference between the two graphs is that the tank temperature in 1 starts below 30° while in 2 it starts above 45°.
In other words it seems that:
a) water heating is only effective below 40°
b) the first couple of pumping cycles seem to be ineffective or even cool down the tank
c) if the time between two pumping cycles is too long again the pumping cycles become ineffective or even cool down the tank
(Please note that besides the 2 uploaded graphs I have a lot more underlining these statements. I believe the 2 posted here basically show the idea though.)
My question:
I can understand that the water in the pipe cools down during the night or when the time between pumping cycles increases. I can also understand that the water cools down more the hotter it is as cooling happens relative to the environment. But we have around 30° air temperature during the day and 25° during the night here so the cooling within 2-3m of isolated pipe should be minimal, no? I could accept the first pumping cycle to cool down the tank a bit as it will pump the leftover water in the pipe from the night into the tank, but subsequent pumping cycles should no longer show that behavior, no? Are there other people out there having access to this kind of data? What are your observations?
Related question:
We are mostly using green plastic pipes with some isolation material around it. However, the connection out of the panel back to the tank has been replaced by a copper pipe (to handle extensive heat). I have limited scientifical knowledge but isn't metal more sensitive to temperature than platsic and passes on temperature differences quicker? I mean with an outside temperature of 30° doesn't a metal pipe cool down the 40° water inside quicker than a plastic pipe would? If yes, could this be the reason for the observations above?
A few months ago we exchanged the controller to a wifi model that I can connect to my HASS system. It works pretty much the same as the previous one but allows me to remote control and automate the system as well as collect some data.
Now this collected data is somewhat confusing me. Let me show a number of graphs that I got out of our system:
---1---
Looking at graph 1 I see more or less what I would expect: After sunrise the panel (T1) heats up and triggers the pump; after every pumping cycle the tank (T2) gets a bit hotter. However, the graph flattens slightly down - meaning that the hotter the water gets, the less the heat increases in the tank per pumping cycle. Oh, and please ignore the temperature increase between 2-3pm, that is the integrated heating module.
---2---
Looking at graph 2 I see the opposite of what I would expect: After sunrise the panel heats up and triggers the pump; but after every pumping cycle the tank gets a bit COOLER (?!). Only after around 10 pumping cycles it starts to slightly heat the tank.
Please note that the main difference between the two graphs is that the tank temperature in 1 starts below 30° while in 2 it starts above 45°.
In other words it seems that:
a) water heating is only effective below 40°
b) the first couple of pumping cycles seem to be ineffective or even cool down the tank
c) if the time between two pumping cycles is too long again the pumping cycles become ineffective or even cool down the tank
(Please note that besides the 2 uploaded graphs I have a lot more underlining these statements. I believe the 2 posted here basically show the idea though.)
My question:
I can understand that the water in the pipe cools down during the night or when the time between pumping cycles increases. I can also understand that the water cools down more the hotter it is as cooling happens relative to the environment. But we have around 30° air temperature during the day and 25° during the night here so the cooling within 2-3m of isolated pipe should be minimal, no? I could accept the first pumping cycle to cool down the tank a bit as it will pump the leftover water in the pipe from the night into the tank, but subsequent pumping cycles should no longer show that behavior, no? Are there other people out there having access to this kind of data? What are your observations?
Related question:
We are mostly using green plastic pipes with some isolation material around it. However, the connection out of the panel back to the tank has been replaced by a copper pipe (to handle extensive heat). I have limited scientifical knowledge but isn't metal more sensitive to temperature than platsic and passes on temperature differences quicker? I mean with an outside temperature of 30° doesn't a metal pipe cool down the 40° water inside quicker than a plastic pipe would? If yes, could this be the reason for the observations above?
Last edited: