What’s the IP rating and who leaves batteries out in the rain?These are Weize batteries and it's water ingress. We've had ~60 in the field and over half of them have failed now. The epoxy is too hard for the flexible plastic, and the epoxy was inconsistently applied. One good rainstorm and then it's a countdown timer before failure.
View attachment 285825
View attachment 285821
View attachment 285822
View attachment 285823
View attachment 285824
That's the worst looking weize battery I've ever seen. What model? Really bad build qualityThese are Weize batteries and it's water ingress. We've had ~60 in the field and over half of them have failed now. The epoxy is too hard for the flexible plastic, and the epoxy was inconsistently applied. One good rainstorm and then it's a countdown timer before failure.
View attachment 285825
View attachment 285821
View attachment 285822
View attachment 285823
View attachment 285824
Some may disagree, but I personally would never sit any of these batteries out in the rain, even if they claim water resistance ratings.IP65, which far exceeds rainy or bad weather. The OP left the battery out and our installations have the batteries outdoors as well. There are obvious use cases for outdoor batteries in exposed conditions, which is why we chose batteries with weather ratings that far exceed our installation use case.
Some may disagree, but I personally would never sit any of these batteries out in the rain, even if they claim water resistance ratings.
I mean heck, I have some water resistant equipment that ~should~ be fine in a storm, but I still put it under something covered where water can't hit it. I know it's not always practical, but for me, personally, a battery is going to at least go under cover or in some kind of additional weather resistant enclosure.
But who am I to say, I think Will and others have just left these types of batteries out in the direct elements and they've run fine. It spooks me too much though.
This. Yes, you _can_ (*) but should you?Some may disagree, but I personally would never sit any of these batteries out in the rain, even if they claim water resistance ratings.
I mean heck, I have some water resistant equipment that ~should~ be fine in a storm, but I still put it under something covered where water can't hit it. I know it's not always practical, but for me, personally, a battery is going to at least go under cover or in some kind of additional weather resistant enclosure.
But who am I to say, I think Will and others have just left these types of batteries out in the direct elements and they've run fine. It spooks me too much though.
I posted in that thread to similar effect, even under the hood, engine compartment environments are pretty extreme.This and the thread where people were talking about starting to use lithium batteries for car starting batteries have some serious potential to talk. They will actually get sprayed with water in a car. Scary stuff. Can't rely on one perfect seal and then consider it good. Systems should be robust enough to not require perfection.
That's the worst looking weize battery I've ever seen. What model? Really bad build quality
Some may disagree, but I personally would never sit any of these batteries out in the rain, even if they claim water resistance ratings.
I mean heck, I have some water resistant equipment that ~should~ be fine in a storm, but I still put it under something covered where water can't hit it. I know it's not always practical, but for me, personally, a battery is going to at least go under cover or in some kind of additional weather resistant enclosure.
But who am I to say, I think Will and others have just left these types of batteries out in the direct elements and they've run fine. It spooks me too much though.
Sounds like mfg changed the materials and/or process without retesting for IP rating. But that’s Chinese “Ship It” quality for you.In this case, IP65 was easily achieved by using a more flexible epoxy or silicone with a slight overfill and wipe process during manufacturing and improved QC. A self-leveling, flexible epoxy would have prevented the voids entirely for example in the adhesive U channels. Unfortunately, that's not what they chose to do and the warranty claims, field failures, product problems, and reputational damage will far exceed the cost of those simple process quality choices imo.
I mean sure, but we're not talking about some US based company that is submitting all their products to be tested by UL or something.The logical process that leads to no accountability for the IP65 rating extends to other objective metrics. So, if we follow that logic to it's conclusion and treat AH ratings like the IP rating scale, it's equivalent to saying we shouldn't expect 200ah from a 200ah battery. We should instead arrange more AHs (or weatherproofing) to meet the original stated AH (or weatherproofing) rating. So, only expect 100ah from a 200ah battery and get 2 of them to be secure in achieving your 200ah need. This while telling the user it was wasn't a good idea to expect 200ah from a 200ah battery.
or their actual lack of quality control to begin with.Sounds like mfg changed the materials and/or process without retesting for IP rating. But that’s Chinese “Ship It” quality for you.
The battery was in perfect condition until I ripped the cells apart.