Daddy Tanuki
Emperor Of Solar
this is so redneck hold ma beer level of testing... I love it!
this is so redneck hold ma beer level of testing... I love it!
I've always found very good and accurate ways to do things relatively inexpensive and then my prime directive is not to lose the energy so either shove it back in the main battery pack which is slammed at 100% today why heat the poolthis is so redneck hold ma beer level of testing... I love it!
Nice! That's not low tech in my book.Well I was distracted and didn't get to the computer fast enough. I was able to cycle the power and read the Victron Shunt before it turned back off. It looks like a coulomb counter and not LV cutoff turned off the BMS at 46.46V. My pool is now 5KW warmer (.1F)
View attachment 279988
I used (past tense) 4 1300 watt hair dryers as a test load allowed me to tailor the load to how I was testing, best thing used units from 2nd hand stores so cheapI've always found very good and accurate ways to do things relatively inexpensive and then my prime directive is not to lose the energy so either shove it back in the main battery pack which is slammed at 100% today why heat the pool
I can always stick an inverter on here or voltage multiplier or add more heaters for 12 volt ones.
I also have a 250 gallon hot tub I could have used to heat the water.
So many choices. By the way I'm burning sensitive documents in the smokeless pit while I'm waiting for my battery to die...
As Aerosmith would say, "going down"
I took a snippet and emailed it to myself (different accounts) and turned the computer off to fast so I didn't get it.. So I have it but now charging it back up over night. It was a SOC disconnect and not a LV disconnect. I'll check it in the morning and do it again...Nice! That's not low tech in my book.
With that load and V, there's close to around 15 minutes left at 21A (.2C)...about 5.25Ah left if cells are well balanced. Again, I would love to see cell level data if possisble.
I used a 3k 48V inverter in the past but the question was did it turn off before the BMS did. That is why I came up with the water cooled dummy load idea.I used (past tense) 4 1300 watt hair dryers as a test load allowed me to tailor the load to how I was testing, best thing used units from 2nd hand stores so cheap
if it works, it ain't stupid.I used a 3k 48V inverter in the past but the question was did it turn off before the BMS did. That is why I came up with the water cooled dummy load idea.
Does the bms allow you to disable the use of soc as a reference for cutoff? Can ot be set to V for the reference?I took a snippet and emailed it to myself (different accounts) and turned the computer off to fast so I didn't get it.. So I have it but now charging it back up over night. It was a SOC disconnect and not a LV disconnect. I'll check it in the morning and do it again...
I imaging if I set the pack amp hour for 105ah it would run down until a LV cell or pack alarm would occur. I also see if the cycle count go up enough to change the SOH, State of Health, it would also reduce the dischargeable amp hour. I saw this on the LifePower4 V1 batteries.Does the bms allow you to disable the use of soc as a reference for cutoff? Can ot be set to V for the reference?
I'm not worried about getting the max capacity. More concerned with soc drift and pack shutting down too early based on false SOC readings. Have you tested the pack to see at what current (Amps) level the BMS triggers a valid read?Everything is adjustable. you can see "SOC to LOW" in the right Alarm State. Using a dumb resistant load takes any question of is the inverter turning off or the BMS. Besides for experimenting I see no reason to change it as I am not worries about one amp hour. View attachment 280019
the resistor is constant so only thing that changes is the voltage in this setup. The current shunt on the bms didn't match the Victron Smart Shunt VSS so I tried doing a calibration on the BMS in the 24A range. It helped but they didn't track perfectly together. May just be using a 8 bit A to D and it can only be so accurate. In Will's video he reported a few amps drift between batteries so it is a thing.I'm not worried about getting the max capacity. More concerned with soc drift and pack shutting down too early based on false SOC readings. Have you tested the pack to see at what current (Amps) level the BMS triggers a valid read?
Still going but just about dead. So the coulomb counter plays a very active role with smart BMS's... So is it safe to say that it messes with the SOC and delivered Ah a little but may help the SOH over the long run? Seems like the dumb voltage BMS's will always outperform on the VSS unless you change the settings. I'll go back to factory but this question has been answered and my pool is ever so slightly warmer
View attachment 280081
View attachment 280080
I agree with you as long as everything's within safe voltage readings let it do what it does and get to work. Does seem to overcomplicate things greatly.I don't think it is a good idea to protect packs using SOC.
So Bob what is your overall Impression so far?I agree with you as long as everything's within safe voltage readings let it do what it does and get to work. Does seem to overcomplicate things greatly.
Something I picked up and will reiterated on his second Eco worthy video.
The smarter the BMS the lower your amp hour test may be![]()
So the hypothesis was the cells have more capacity than the intelligent BMS will let it give. The BMS interacts not only by voltage but measured capacity. If that capacity isn't set accurately taking consideration the accuracy of the current shunt in the BMS then it's not going to deliver the rated 100 amp hours as advertised.So Bob what is your overall Impression so far?
BMS, Cell Balance and Ah?
Sounds good to me as I don't go below 20% SOC on my batteries.So the hypothesis was the cells have more capacity than the intelligent BMS will let it give. The BMS interacts not only by voltage but measured capacity. If that capacity isn't set accurately taking consideration the accuracy of the current shunt in the BMS then it's not going to deliver the rated 100 amp hours as advertised.
One of my batteries I tested was set for 102 amp hours and came out at 100 perfectly every time like it was pre tested where all the other ones were set for a hundred and gave her own 98 to 99.
So this was more about proving how much these smart BMS interact with output. For what I can tell from the settings is anything more than an 80% discharge it will start ticking back the state of health SOH, and other factors that'll pissed off to be a mess it'll negatively affect the SOH. I have an image I'll share later where I actually got a percent of SOH taken away from me and my test.
So as far as this battery and price no complaints had a lot of fun with it, price was right, and Will's video summed it up.
Every new battery I test will go through a balancing act deep discharge charge it won't go into production until I'm very happy with the results. Once it goes in the production in the main battery pack and it won't be touched for a very long time unless something happens...
Enjoy the absolutely beautiful South Florida water dumping all these kilowatts into my pool. Cooking a really big thick chuck roast like a brisket on the Ninja wood fire grill runoff solar. A little musky and hickory smoke![]()
I had an engineer stop by today and he basically said two things really simple don't do itSounds good to me as I don't go below 20% SOC on my batteries.
Certain people on here keep saying it's fine to discharge down to 10% or even 0% and yet here we are three years later and the battery companies are still pegging their Warranty to that 20% level. I suspect they know a lot more than our experts.
BTW did you ask them about the Gender confused Positive Terminal Cap? It would be nice if it was Red and not Purple lol.
Yeah, that BMS takes the user input rated capacity (rc) and compares with its own soc calc to determine soh.