50mm equals 1/0 AWG (
i think)
In
my ignorance, I have the same takeaway
I don't know how inverter fuses are sized, I do know a common rule of thumb for overccurent protection is: minimum fuse size of current x 1.25 (but that is not universally applicable).
Victron is a reputable and conservative company, I would trust there fuse size to be properly sized.
The fuse size might be a good proxy for BMS size.
I think a 300A BMS for a 3000W / 24v BMS is a healthy safety margin. Its large enough that even at peak surge power its technically within the BMS limits, and at a more realistic continuous or moderate surge its got a healthy safety margin.
Not necessarily. Almost no BMS popular here has active balancing.
The names are 'active' and 'passive' can be misleading. The (practical) difference is that a passive balancer uses resistors to 'burn off' energy from high cells, while an active balancer transfers energy from one cell to another. The other practical difference is active balancers tend to have higher max current.
But this one does:
I think active balancing is a 'nice to have' feature, not a necessity. Unless your cells are mismatched to the point a low current passive balancer can't keep the pack balanced during normal use in which case it becomes more than just a 'nice to have'
That said, if I was looking at a FET based BMS, I would strongly consider the heltec active balancing BMSes.
There are many others more informed on this topic than I am, this is just my 2c from the small amount of research I have done.