Agreed, go to YouTube and forums for technical informationPlease don't get news or technical information from FB on anything.
Agreed, go to YouTube and forums for technical informationPlease don't get news or technical information from FB on anything.
And always verify the information from multiple sources. Youtube and forums are fallible, as well.Agreed, go to YouTube and forums for technical information
There is much to be learned from those that are not professionals. Sometimes peoples posts of hands on experiences are intriguing and much can be learned from them as well. And some who claim to be "industry professionals" have opinions with little to no data to back it up. And if they do have data it might be old data.I don't mate. I just corrected some people who were saying lifepo4 explode into flames and vent toxic gas then this tool decided to try and flex his "expertise" lol. I get all my info from Will's YouTube/blog or industry professionals
Internally, one of the terminals is constructed of aluminum. That is part of the battery chemistry that makes it work. Yes there is a charge on the exterior case. No, it is not connected to the positive terminal. The current it can generate is small, it is missing some of the other coatings present on the true cell positive to carry a substantial amount of current. This is why they wrap the cells.And can anyone confirm the casing on these cells is in fact this dangerous and any contact with metal can cause a short circuit?
@Will Prowse Could you clarify why the battery behavior in the “spearing” video isn’t an exothermic reaction resulting in combustion? It doesn’t seem like the spear provided a spark. It looks like a second major puncture resulted in a fire, no?The electrolyte is flammable. If a cell is physically damaged, you can catch it on fire. But for an exothermic reaction to occur to cause combustion, from the literature I've read, is impossible with lifepo4. Well, unless you had a pile of kindling next to a spark generator of sorts ? or a dead short next to a fuel source. But to have combustion caused internally, is impossible.
That is literally impossible. Not exothermic.@Will Prowse Could you clarify why the battery behavior in the “spearing” video isn’t an exothermic reaction resulting in combustion? It doesn’t seem like the spear provided a spark. It looks like a second major puncture resulted in a fire, no?
That is literally impossible. Not exothermic.
Electrolyte is flammable, something caused initial combustion event and electrolyte burned.
I think you should recreate this event in a laboratory. Pretty sure the second puncture caused combustion. Those cells are hermetically sealed for good reason. But it is impossible to have self propagating thermal runaway with lifepo4. But that electrolyte will burn.
Not real familiar how to post, but thought this would be good to share. Ive been adding solar and building battery banks for the past year. I am a commercial electrician but the battery building is new territory. I has this 310AH 16s battery operating just fine with an Ant BMS. Luckily had it in a metal box and in the garage. Ive had no issues, solar charges during the day, battery at night. I cycle pretty low (I think) I stop charging at 54V and Start back up at 51.2V. The inverter was still operating while she was smoking. I dindt have a temp sensor on this specific cell, so it just cooked. I can not for sure identify what caused it. Im hoping to blame myself as I would like to use the other 15 cells. But concerned it was an internal cell failure. Has anyone experienced this?I would like to challenge anyone reading this to find a photo or video of a LiFePO4 creating internal combustion from thermal runaway event.
I keep seeing people comment that LiFePO4 can combust, but UL listed companies and battery studies are telling me otherwise. Where are people coming up with this idea? LiFePO4 raw cells are being constructed in packs without individual cell fusing, and no one is blinking an eye.
But there are articles from reputable people (Jack Rickards videos as well) stating that they can combust.
So if someone can PLEASE email me evidence of LiFePO4 combusting from thermal runaway, I would love to see it (my email is willprowseiv@gmail.com)
Here is some of my proof that LiFePO4 is NOT combustible:
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1395736
https://relionbattery.com/uploads/images/misc/Relion_SafetyLithiumBattery.pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2191/pdf
So the cobalt based ones have oxygen loosely attached, and when hot, can cause combustion. This makes it more hot, and thermal runaway goes nuts! And LiFePO4 does not have this problem, no cobalt. Am I missing something?
And this is what combustion is: high-temperature exothermic redox chemical reaction between a fuel and an oxidant, usually atmospheric oxygen, that produces oxidized, often gaseous products, in a mixture termed as smoke. Combustion in a fire produces a flame, and the heat produced can make combustion self-sustaining. LiFePO4 heat generation, is not self-sustaining, and does not create enough heat to combust cells next to it.
It will create heat, but not much. There is no "cascade" effect, from what I can tell. It is not considered a oxide based lithium ion chemistry. And I remember when learning about rocket fuels (scott manley's youtube channel!), that pressure and temperature have a huge part to play in this reaction.
But what I find interesting is the thermal runaway properties of LiFePO4 at various temperatures... it does not increase. View attachment 1340
And simpli-phi, which creates high quality, UL listed battery packs, states this as well:
View attachment 1342
Technically, any battery can pose a fire threat because it can cause a conductor in a system to heat up (if OCPD not present), and set something else on fire. But the internal chemistry of a lifepo4, as I can tell and what safety studies have shown, is that it cannot. If you disagree with this, please let me know below.
Would be helpful if you posted this as a new message in the https://diysolarforum.com/forums/up-in-smoke-learn-from-my-mistake.83/ forum so it doesn't get muddled up in this thread.Not real familiar how to post, but thought this would be good to share. Ive been adding solar and building battery banks for the past year. I am a commercial electrician but the battery building is new territory. I has this 310AH 16s battery operating just fine with an Ant BMS. Luckily had it in a metal box and in the garage. Ive had no issues, solar charges during the day, battery at night. I cycle pretty low (I think) I stop charging at 54V and Start back up at 51.2V. The inverter was still operating while she was smoking. I dindt have a temp sensor on this specific cell, so it just cooked. I can not for sure identify what caused it. Im hoping to blame myself as I would like to use the other 15 cells. But concerned it was an internal cell failure. Has anyone experienced this?
Thanks! I actually did. Found this via Google and didnt realize it was from 2019!Would be helpful if you posted this as a new message in the https://diysolarforum.com/forums/up-in-smoke-learn-from-my-mistake.83/ forum so it doesn't get muddled up in this thread.
Any thoughts or experience on how something like this could happen? Loose terminal? BMS? Bad Cell? I actually bought the cells and Ant BMS from watching your videos! Thanks for all you do.It is impossible to have a self propagating thermal runaway with lifepo4. You can catch it on fire like wood, and the electrolyte will burn. But that's not thermal runaway
Loose connection is what I am leaning towards. I dont see how it could have short circuited unless the case broke, or internal short in the battery?It had to have been a loose connection or a short circuit.
There's voltage on the case, but I have seen tests that show it is very low leakage current. It's not a direct short to either terminal.If two cells made contact with the case, it would be a dead short of whatever the voltage is between those two cells, in the series string.
Just checked, it's actually the positive.The case is directly connected to one of the poles. I can't remember which, I want to say negative.