• Have you tried out dark mode?! Scroll to the bottom of any page to find a sun or moon icon to turn dark mode on or off!

diy solar

diy solar

CHINA kills all non Sol-Ark branded DEYE unit in the USA this morning.

If you contract a company to build a thing for you, then that company starts selling that same thing with their own name on it for less than you sell your version, would you be OK with that?
I don't think anyone's saying they should be OK with it. And, there are likely a percentage of the users of Deye inverters in the US that knew about SolArk's exclusive distribution rights in the US, and should've weighed the decision to purchase it. Having it cloud connected in that circumstance was not a good choice.

However, bricking people's inverters, that they use to power things, is ... extreme.

Here's another example: New SGP Hybrid
Look at that link. Look at the manual. Tell me how much it resembles the Midnite 'The One' AIO, minus the smart breakers? Midnite has their own firmware and special sauce, but this is the chassis and basic version of what they customized. Should they be mad, or have taken action? If you're interested in this model, is the price difference between it and the Midnite worth it to you?

In terms of an open market and competition, let the customer decide. SolArk is grossly overpriced for what it is relative to what's on the market. Maybe it wasn't when it came out, but it sure is now.
 
I think the issue with that is that it wasn't necessarily Deye who sold the inverters to the consumer.

Not sure that should matter. Dye has a responsibility to uphold its side of the contract and should restrict how they're distributed as well as permanently mark them, "not permitted for use in USA/UK/Pakistan" that way the consumer is also informed.
 
Probably the best option is for Deye to turn each inverter on and pay Sol-Ark a fee for each one they turn on. Unfortunately, that still holds Deye responsible for inverters they didn't sell. But then again, they didn't have to allow them to be activated.
 
Not sure that should matter. Dye has a responsibility to uphold its side of the contract and should restrict how they're distributed as well as permanently mark them, "not permitted for use in USA/UK/Pakistan" that way the consumer is also informed.
The more I think about it, the more I agree. They didn't have to allow them to be activated at setup. IF they can tell now, they knew then.
 
An individual purchased an Deye inverter. Possibly from someone selling within or into the US, possibly bought it themselves overseas and carried or had it sent here.

Is that (all of the above possible cases) illegal?
If the individual did not enter into a contract saying they would not operate it in the US, I think they could operate it here. Especially if they were the importer.

If manufacturer Deye bricked it, they can take up a dispute with Deye.
But if US based SolArk pressured Deye to brick it, perhaps SolArk is financially responsible for the damage caused.

You aren't allowed to bring a trademark [edit: Copyright?] violating "Disney" object into the US.
You are allowed to bring a knock-off fake Rolex.
 
Last edited:
An individual purchased an Deye inverter. Possibly from someone selling within or into the US, possibly bought it themselves overseas and carried or had it sent here.

Is that (all of the above possible cases) illegal?
If the individual did not enter into a contract saying they would not operate it in the US, I think they could operate it here. Especially if they were the importer.

If manufacturer Deye bricked it, they can take up a dispute with Deye.
But if US based SolArk pressured Deye to brick it, perhaps SolArk is financially responsible for the damage caused.

You aren't allowed to bring a trademark violating "Disney" object into the US.
You are allowed to bring a knock-off fake Rolex.
I'm guessing Sol-Ark has shown Deye that they've knowingly allowed this to happen. Deye probably knows it can't win in court. There is probably a lot going on in the background to resolve this, all parties being involved.
 
This is a borderline terrorist cyber attack. Electricity is not some luxury that only a few people have. It is a necessity. By shutting it off without warming is sure to catch the eye of law enforcement somewhere. It is likely to put the company(ies) responsible out of business.
 
Will never buy or recommend Solark/Deye ever again.
I can understand recommending one not buy a Deye here, they aren't supposed to be sold here.
But Sol-Ark? Sol-Ark didn't disable the inverters. Deye did. Ask Deye why they did it. It's possible that Sol-Ark wanted a different solution. Who knows at this point.
 
“You aren't allowed to bring a trademark violating "Disney" object into the US.”


Can Disiney break into your home and retrieve the object?


This whole thing seems very odd to me. Hopefully Solark can chime in.

Based on in-flight customs information.
What would be confiscated vs. what you can bring. I think up to 5 counterfeit Rolex allowed.

Software/firmware more likely protected (read all about the Big Battery guy).
If the Deye has Deye not SolArk firmware, and the only problem was Deye not honoring a contract with SolArk, I wonder if SolArk has just placed themselves in a bind. Or if Deye did this of their own volition (good like enforcing something in the country which thinks it has the right to take Taiwan by force.)
 
Let me see if I got this right. After reading the messages above, this is my understanding of what happened.

Deye cloned Sol-Ark inverters without authorization
Sol-Ark (a US-based company) decided to disable unauthorized Deye inverters today
People in Pakistan, US, UK who own Deye inverters are screwed
So a US company is enforcing its intellectual property rights by disabling unauthorized clones.

Am I right about this?
no you are not

Deye builds inverters, and there are 3 official resellers/rebadgers...

Sol-ark( USA/CANADA) , Sunsynk( South Africa, UK ) , Turbo Energy ( Pakistan), DEYE ( rest of the world)

Sol-ark has an exclusive contract for the USA and Canada , and has been putting pressure on Deye to disable the USA/CANADA inverters deye sold under it's own brand, because of declining sales

again , and said this many times...

ISOLATE YOUR INVERTER AND MONITOR INDEPENDANT!
 
Here's another example: New SGP Hybrid
Look at that link. Look at the manual. Tell me how much it resembles the Midnite 'The One' AIO, minus the smart breakers? Midnite has their own firmware and special sauce, but this is the chassis and basic version of what they customized. Should they be mad, or have taken action? If you're interested in this model, is the price difference between it and the Midnite worth it to you?
So you are saying operationally they are not the same thing?
 
IMHO, the best course of action would be to hold Deye responsible, not the consumers. Dye should have to compensate Sol-Ark, not brick its customer's equipment.
That sure give Deye incentive to work with Sol-Ark to resolve these issues. Or for the customers to pay Sol-Ark licensing fees to get their unit back up and running and then isolate them via another monitoring method.
 

diy solar

diy solar
Back
Top