The code of conduct seems to be getting ignored since EG4, their consultants, Sig Solar, and others advertise new products, trade in promotions, and sometimes even conduct PR hit jobs backed up with fake images.
I mean look at the timeline here from an impartial standpoint:
- EG4 CEO posts about something with an unknown spread, pins it on a competitor.
- Edits post to remove some of the more direct barbs pinning it to competition, but not until the ball is rolling
- Talk starts about competitor units getting bricked, along with OEMs, this is pushed back on by some more discerning members here
- EG4 CEO "finds" image and story to "back up" the original narrative, which turns out to be a complete fabrication
- Releases letter trumpeting their stance on this amped up situation of unknown scope.
With zero defense of other brands, it only takes a little bit of critical thinking to determine that something stinks.
How does this help the solar community? It distracts from finding the scope of a real issue, and starts a brand war among those who have nothing to gain by bashing their fellow forum members.