One interesting thing was COMPRESSION .. since they are vertical -- the bottom battery is literally supporting 80 pounds ... and the TOP one zero ... you know though -- at this point in life -- i'm just not going to worry about it ... at 54 volts right now and 325 Ah -- thats over 17,550 Ah and I'm just going to let it be what it is ...
@ghostwriter66 I have read through your posts with interest - thanks for posting here!!
I am building a lawn mowing robot with a 22.8kWh pack consisting of 30 LF230s (purchasing from DOCAN - I agree they are good) in a 2P x 15S configuration. We go pretty gentle on the cells, charging at 0.12C, discharge at 0.15C (peak discharge 0.4C for up to 10 minutes). We require the the pack to last 7 years and 1,750 cycles. The pack is installed in a custom-designed aluminum and steel rover. Currently our cells are insulated from each other and from the chassis with FR4/garolite and held in place with ratchet straps.
My question to you is, what is your thinking on the benefits of compression? The EVE specs state 300 kgf compression to achieve 2,500 cycles. Are you compressing your cells? Are you aware that anyone is? The PCBWay DIY Pack uses threaded rods. This teardown of a Tesla pack (and this one) using prismatic LFPs looks like they have some foam between the cells but the frame itself sure doesn't look like it is beefy enough to provide 300kgf (per cell; 10 cells side-by-side means 3000kgf!). Compressing with threaded rods seems pretty imprecise. These people observed that with a rigid frame the cell swelling & shrinking causes differences in pressures between cells - which can be used to provide a much better SOC estimate that just cell voltages alone.
What do you think? Thanks in advance for your thoughts - and thanks again for all of your posts here.
Chris
Few pics of our rovers here https://photos.app.goo.gl/2pcyJTWpAhDcW3AP9
Last edited: