1201
Solar Wizard
Also, the pge agreement is called an "interconnection agreement" and it spells out that it deals with systems that are "connected in parallel' to pge.
Wait, this is a little confusing.I know of several installations under NEM 2.0 which have added battery back systems without an interconnection agreement.
But according to them I am not interconnecting it if I have a "Break before Make" system. Either system (battery or battery with SolarPV generates power) and both are physically interconnected; that's the whole point of having such a switch.No actually they are quite clear about it. If a system is interconnected without authorization they will pull the meter. That means it has to be interconnected. If its not interconnected then its not their business
I pay to have legal and functional electrical service.. ..I guess the phrase "I only charge my batteries with the grid when they are low" has several layers of meaning. And has for many years
I am thinking that the PoCo's believe/think that all home solar systems MUST connect to the grid because that is how it has always (lol) been like that - thus the "rules". it is a "divide by zero" event if anyone does it differently
Correct, your inverter is never connected to the grid.But according to them I am not interconnecting it if I have a "Break before Make" system.
But according to them I am not interconnecting it if I have a "Break before Make" system. Either system (battery or battery with SolarPV generates power) and both are physically interconnected; that's the whole point of having such a switch.
I just want to avoid the Interconnection agreement because it is as timselectric said, a PitA.
especially the "divide by zero" comment... "Computer science", "Math", "Engineering" major? Please DM if you'd like not to create chatter in this thread.
Yes, when I spoke to PGE, they did say that to me on a couple of occasions. "Why would you want to generate that much energy and not feed it back to the grid...?"
I was polite and I didn't tell them what was on my mind... which was "it's because you've taken advantage of me and so many others for years... And now you want me to give you energy for free (I get nothing under NEM3.0) while you charge $0.45/kWh for it to someone else?
And that was my polite way of putting it... I didn't want to offend anyone's eyes when reading it in this thread!
I should have been more clear. The initial GT system was under NEM 2.0. Then a non export hybrid inverter with batteries was added without a new or additional interconnection agreement.Wait, this is a little confusing.
Isn't NEM 2.0 by definition, an interconnection agreement?
So, it's still under the existing agreement?I should have been more clear. The initial GT system was under NEM 2.0. Then a non export hybrid inverter with batteries was added without a new or additional interconnection agreement.
OK, I thought that you were saying that there was an exception that didn't require any agreement. I understand, now.Yes that is what it means.
That letter was referring to a paired storage agreement where stored solar is exported to the grid. That is what SNEM means. Those are typically issued in conjunction with SGIP grants. My reference was to a non export storage system. Angie Wong is welcome to pull the meter on my house which has a legally permitted non export hybrid inverter with battery configured for non export.
PGE is basically saying we do not wish to be subjected to market forces. If we're going to lay infrastructure to your house, we want the money back from you, and we don't want to look like the "bad guys" by going to the tax man so often to cover our "bad infra" bets. PGE could also have decided to help customers install solar and reduce their reliance on the grid so grids become ultra local. Instead, they chose to make it complex and feed contractors so those who fear DIY would pay $5/W (without battery) installation costs when it can be done for <<<$2 (incl. batteries). It's not a free market economy; it's "free to enter but you'll get ripped off by me if you don't have as much money as me" market.referring back to this email
they assert/believe/require:
they are the grid gods
- If you have solar/battery storage THEN it must (need) to be parallel to PG&E grid
- no off grid allowed is what I see here - horse feathers
- THEN you must have an agreement
- Break Before Make is an exception, not for normal us
now I understand what this guy is saying
The $145 interconnect application isn’t hard, someone that does it twice would get fluent with it.Instead, they chose to make it complex and feed contractors
I definitely agree microgrid tech requires substantial improvement; BUT... it’s been 20+ years (some argue longer) & it’s not rocket science (rocket science has advanced further in a shorter period of time).The $145 interconnect application isn’t hard, someone that does it twice would get fluent with it.
Most of the gates are from contractor licensing, inspections, equipment certifications.
Also you are underplaying the fact that stable microgrid tech is still in its infancy (and by microgrid I don’t mean one house, I mean one block). This ranges from grid forming inverters in the fancy sense of simulating the stabilizing capability of spinning generators, to distributed control protocols and algorithms, which are likely not adjacent to the control means used in the grid today (or if they are, it requires a smart migration plan)
I would have preferred a nuanced argument maybe around saying we should be pushing more into the research and pilot trials.
A CCA is not microgrid technology. It is a result of deregulation and the separation of Generation and Distribution. A CCA is mostly paperwork, but a valuable aspect of deregulation. My CCA has contracted for both solar and a battery facility but those are not integrated into a microgrid but they will help the grid in my area. I have not heard how the battery facility will operate in the event of a power outage....take the example of CCA efforts, of the tech that is already available; they could have implemented it in this fashion....
Thanks.A CCA is not microgrid technology. It is a result of deregulation and the separation of Generation and Distribution. A CCA is mostly paperwork, but a valuable aspect of deregulation. My CCA has contracted for both solar and a battery facility but those are not integrated into a microgrid but they will help the grid in my area. I have not heard how the battery facility will operate in the event of a power outage.
Not my experience at all. The difference in cost, between utility and contractor was over $10KIm sure the grid tie route is FAR cheaper than going off grid. Far cheaper.