skyking1
Solar Enthusiast
second the trough suggestion. Easy to avoid parallel paths and keep it all civil.
Thanks for the help! I think I finally have it understood. I was trying to cheap out with the interlock. But at the total cost of this system, a couple hundred bucks for a 3 pole disconnect to do it right is insignificant in the long run. Much appreciated!The reason why you don't want a parallel neutral path is because both paths will share the neutral current.
If you switch the hots to bypass the inverter, to work on it.
When you try to unhook the neutral in the inverter, you will be handling a conductor that is carrying current.
Yeah, if the trough option won't work for you, then a 3 pole transfer switch is the next best option.Thanks for the help! I think I finally have it understood. I was trying to cheap out with the interlock. But at the total cost of this system, a couple hundred bucks for a 3 pole disconnect to do it right is insignificant in the long run. Much appreciated!
I’ve been looking all day. I can’t find a 100 amp 3 pole double throw transfer switch anywhere. Any online electrical stores I should search?Yeah, if the trough option won't work for you, then a 3 pole transfer switch is the next best option.
Yeah. This is the only one I’ve really found. And, yeah, ouch!! I’m not doing that.I’m running an interlocked CL panel with parallel neutrals with a 6000xp. I have no issues with GFCI or AFCI circuits. Was going to do a three pole TS but was way too expensive at the time.
Unless you want to spend $2k , I would suggest Ebay.I’ve been looking all day. I can’t find a 100 amp 3 pole double throw transfer switch anywhere. Any online electrical stores I should search?
GFCI's and AFCI's only protect what is on the load side of them.I’m running an interlocked CL panel with parallel neutrals with a 6000xp. I have no issues with GFCI or AFCI circuits.
Here is a 3 pole automatic transfer switch that might work for you:
Does the trough setup eliminate the concerns of the parallel neutral issue?A trough would be so much better for many reasons.
Yes, it allows the use of a single neutral, tapped to each item.Does the trough setup eliminate the concerns of the parallel neutral issue?
Use an insulated Polaris connector like this?Yes, it allows the use of a single neutral, tapped to each item.
That'll do fine.Use an insulated Polaris connector like this?
![]()
While true, the voltage when you make the disconnect will be tiny since the other path is a solid connection and is rated to take the entire neutral load. We're talking millivolts.The reason why you don't want a parallel neutral path is because both paths will share the neutral current.
If you switch the hots to bypass the inverter, to work on it.
When you try to unhook the neutral in the inverter, you will be handling a conductor that is carrying current.
If you have any critical load panel bypass capability, you are going to make a loop with the inverter grid neutral and the inverter load neutral.I figured that was the ticket. One for neutral one for grounds. Make trees and not loops![]()
For the ground, just use a ground bar. $10I figured that was the ticket. One for neutral one for grounds. Make trees and not loops
$71 and saves so much monkey motion.
I predict that will be something you will regret. Any time you have to do anything to the inverter, you lose power. For example, a firmware update.I decided against the bypass capability. I won't have any loops.
You will probably regret not having that option.I decided against the bypass capability. I won't have any loops.