diy solar

diy solar

current flow concept

John Frum

Tell me your problems
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Messages
15,233
My simple understanding is in a dc circuit current flows out the positive terminal of charge source and back to the negative terminal of the same charge source.
If... the voltage is sufficient to overcome the resistance along the path.
If the path is air the resistance if relatively high.
If the path is copper the resistance is relatively low.
Is it conceptually valid to imagine the charge source sucking up electrons on the negative terminal?
Like negative pressure?
 
Conventional current flow is positive charge flowing from the positive terminal (cathode). For metals this is equivalent to electrons (negative charges) flowing into the positive terminal. A good overview is here
 
Electricians prefer conventional current flow i.e from +ve to -ve. Electronics guys like myself understand electron flow better as an electron is negatively charged and it is attracted to +ve terminal. :unsure:
 
Conventional current flow is positive charge flowing from the positive terminal (cathode). For metals this is equivalent to electrons (negative charges) flowing into the positive terminal. A good overview is here
ok so the positive terminal is sucking up electrons?
 
and the energy is flowing from positive to negative but the electrons are flowing from negative to positive?
 
Yes you are exactly correct.
The positive terminal is attracting or sucking up negatively charged electrons.
Now for further confusion : As the electrons move they leave a +ve 'hole' behind so electrons flow from -ve to +ve and the holes flow in the opposite direction which is conventional current flow :oops:
 
Physics and math time, yay!

The Poynting vector for a simple DC power source and a resistive load with ideal conductors looks as follows:

S = (1/μ0) (ExB)

Where μ0 is the permeability and E and B the Electric and Magnetic components of the EM field respectively. If you draw this out for a simple circuit (and using conventional current), you get this:

poynting.png
As you can see, the Poynting vector at every point in the circuit is directed to the resistor from the source. This makes sense if you think about it: energy only goes from source to destination, it doesn't come back. It is transformed into e.g. heat in the resistor.

You can actually derive the commonly known P=RI^2 formula from this principle as well, but I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader :)
 
Physics and math time, yay!

The Poynting vector for a simple DC power source and a resistive load with ideal conductors looks as follows:

S = (1/μ0) (ExB)

Where μ0 is the permeability and E and B the Electric and Magnetic components of the EM field respectively. If you draw this out for a simple circuit (and using conventional current), you get this:

As you can see, the Poynting vector at every point in the circuit is directed to the resistor from the source. This makes sense if you think about it: energy only goes from source to destination, it doesn't come back. It is transformed into e.g. heat in the resistor.

You can actually derive the commonly known P=RI^2 formula from this principle as well, but I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader :)
I will wrestle with this tonight and report back tomorrow before Lesson #2
 
So voltage is suckage? :D
There is actually no such thing as suckage, except in very old professions. A vacuum when opened to high pressure molecules gets filled because the high pressure molecules are in motion and basically push each other into the vacuum, like a crowd dispersing.

Not sure how to apply that to electrical theory, though I've heard voltage described as a force or pushing. Every time I read up on it it begins about how wrong we were, then how less wrong we were. So, you can only wonder how wrong we are.
 
There is actually no such thing as suckage, except in very old professions. A vacuum when opened to high pressure molecules gets filled because the high pressure molecules are in motion and basically push each other into the vacuum, like a crowd dispersing.

Not sure how to apply that to electrical theory, though I've heard voltage described as a force or pushing. Every time I read up on it it begins about how wrong we were, then how less wrong we were. So, you can only wonder how wrong we are.

Loose analogy on my part. :D
 
Back
Top