edcoopered
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2021
- Messages
- 42
For what its worth I've never managed to successfully post a link to anything on a YouTube comment, the comment appears, and then a few minutes later just disappears.
Youtube has become such a bad platform for technical discussion, I've wasted several hours of my life trying to construct helpful comments, and they just get voted into oblivion, replaced by "YT presenter name, you're incredible, amazing, free energy, how are you so incredibly brilliant, you've saved the world, love the product, I've brought 400."
Upvote/downvote was never a good way to judge the technical accuracy or legitimacy of something anyways (as you've just shown above with your example). Look at reddit, youtube, etc. On Reddit you can say something purely objective, simple, and provably true, but if its unpopular it will be downvoted to all hell. Likewise you can say something unambiguously false, but if it 'rings true', sounds witty, or reflects back what the majority wants to believe it'll often be upvoted, even if its pointed out that it isn't accurate in the comments. Simple up/down voting should never be a basis for judging whether something is factual, accurate, or true, as they are a reflection of what is popular or unpopular not what is true or false.Removing the down-vote ratio means you now have no idea if a technical video is total bullshit, unless you trawl through the comments - looking for the useful ones....
I love youtube for some things even if it means turning the sound off. It can be extremely helpful, for instance in mechanical work, to see someone else open the engine and components so you know what things look like before you get in there.Upvote/downvote was never a good way to judge the technical accuracy or legitimacy of something anyways (as you've just shown above with your example). Look at reddit, youtube, etc. On Reddit you can say something purely objective, simple, and provably true, but if its unpopular it will be downvoted to all hell. Likewise you can say something unambiguously false, but if it 'rings true', sounds witty, or reflects back what the majority wants to believe it'll often be upvoted, even if its pointed out that it isn't accurate in the comments. Simple up/down voting should never be a basis for judging whether something is factual, accurate, or true, as they are a reflection of what is popular or unpopular not what is true or false.
My feeling is any system with up/downvoting and an algorithm that is tuned to 'engagement' is a poor place for technical discussion. A simpler platform like a forum is a better format for technical or more in depth discussions I think.
Youtube comments are sorted very oddly. It seems like certain comments, like ones from well know content providers stay at the top and ones from regular folk get randomly shuffled around every time you reload the video page. Most good videos have more than 100 comments, sometimes 500+ comments, so yours may be buried down several pages.For what its worth I've never managed to successfully post a link to anything on a YouTube comment, the comment appears, and then a few minutes later just disappears.
Same here. If you just want some entertainment then look at his videos, if you want technically sound advice then look elsewhere. That breaker is not something I would ever use.David's technical inaccuracies have been brought up multiple times on this form already. To me, he's the definition of "paid product reviews".
I wouldn't take any advice from him.
Never had that problem and his Videos always seem to be on the up and up to me.Unfortunately, I sometimes suspect Will has fallen into the same pot hole as other YTers.
I bought some of the tools he recommended, just to be outright disappointed. They don't work like he advertises (makes things look easy, when they are not, and the tools don't work flawlessly like in the vids).
@ThermodynamicalFor what its worth I've never managed to successfully post a link to anything on a YouTube comment, the comment appears, and then a few minutes later just disappears.
I take him for the reviews, and that with a grain of salt and one eye wide open. But he is entertaining.Same here. If you just want some entertainment then look at his videos, if you want technically sound advice then look elsewhere. That breaker is not something I would ever use.
I like him for new ideas for stuff to do. He does do some very cool projects. I'm like, "I didn't know I needed a 48 volt battery to haul across my yard so I could use corded tools, but now I think I might" but I couldn't care less what equipment he's using, I do my own research for sure.I take him for the reviews, and that with a grain of salt and one eye wide open. But he is entertaining.
And I'm interested in that 32 seer Innovair AC heatpump.
It required a degree of interpretation, if I was looking for a how to wire a plug tutorial and there was over 5% downvotes that would immediately rise my suspicions and cause me to go looking beyond the top-rated sycophants posts. For home DIY projects this rule was pretty foolproof.Upvote/downvote was never a good way to judge the technical accuracy or legitimacy of something anyways (as you've just shown above with your example). Look at reddit, youtube, etc.
I don’t believe that’s a fair assessment.Again, it's not just Will, it's probably 99% of the YTers out there.
I'm not expecting great performance from cheap tools. I am expecting Will and other YTers to give an honest opinion.I don’t believe that’s a fair assessment.
Will doesn’t hesitate to diss bad stuff, and he very often says he’s trying something “I bought with my own money.”
The OK crimpers some people dislike work OK. Very well for $30 tools or whatever. But not as nicely as the fancy pants $200 crimpers. To my way of thinking I wouldn’t be surprised or disappointed that an okay $30 tool doesn’t perform like a $200 tool.
Will is often recommending good, cheap stuff for DIY. If you’re a tool junkie like me but can’t tolerate OK tools, go buy the $200 version. It makes no logical sense to pee on Will because he affiliates a good cheap DIY tool when one actually wants an FAA/ISO/SAE stamped tool and didn’t buy it.
I get your point, many times Will tends to lean towards the low end item that work good, I never found anything he recommended to be of poor quality but of course it's not going to work like the one that cost 3 times as much.I'm not expecting great performance from cheap tools. I am expecting Will and other YTers to give an honest opinion.
As I mentioned, Will (and others) make some tools and products seem "perfect" and "must have" (whether cheap or expensive) but in many cases its far from that.
Saying that they were bought "from own money" isn't an assurance that the review will be honest, especially if you make $$$ from affiliate links.
That is revealing of your presuppositions and bias but it isn’t a supportable assessment. He made a video once revealing his revenue streams. At this point he’s made enough money from his book (and considering his personal history) that he doesn’t care if you click his affiliate link. And good for him!Saying that they were bought "from own money" isn't an assurance that the review will be honest, especially if you make $$$ from affiliate links.
Don't get me wrong, I admire Will and his work/contributions to the solar community (and bringing up this forum, of course).That is revealing of your presuppositions and bias but it isn’t a supportable assessment. He made a video once revealing his revenue streams. At this point he’s made enough money from his book (and considering his personal history) that he doesn’t care if you click his affiliate link. And good for him!
Recently he discounted his book to the lowest Amazon cost as well. Essentially giving it away.
Ya, it sounds like he’s being greedy and disingenuously promoting linked products. Not!
I’ve never met the guy but I’d like to. A person that bootstraps from nothing and ‘makes it’ while showing integrity and - perhaps- compassion is an admirable person to me.
If he’s making tons of income: good for him! He’s paying the taxes to support people who won’t or can’t take a leap and make something of themselves.
Will’s reviews don’t smack of disingenuous motivations to me. If you like his videos you can choose to support him by buying linked products, unlike television or online networks that force you to watch ads whether you like the products or show AND you pay for those ads every time you buy a Brand product because that cost is built into the post-excise pricing.
Your criticism is reflective of your personal bias but it doesn’t actually hold water under thoughtful scrutiny imho.
(Nevertheless, sorry, Will. I didn’t buy that crimper because I have a more expensive one LOL)
Or perhaps does the youtube machine simply delete comments with links