Do We Need a Control Group?

[D71]

They have to pay up on past contracts and continue to use the budget, but Rubio says he cut 83% of the programs from the department. Is there a list of what is still being funded?

Court Took away Trumps claim to be a King. EO does not cut it. Tried tell ppl that over and over. Live and learn for the Trump Tards.
You'd think they would wise up. $2 billion will be spent and the lower courts will decide not even up to Rubio. Foreign aid via the federal judge's bench is now in effect. Not how that is suppose to work either.

Here is a list of ppl reported to sued to get USAID restored for $2 Billion dollars. HIAS is a group everyone should know by now. They have helped flood borders of USA. Various Law Firms and such were used to represent illegals in process of HIAS.

Bob says, "Ask GROK"
""""
Several aid groups and organizations have initiated lawsuits against the Trump administration regarding the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the freezing or termination of foreign aid funding. Based on available information, here are the key aid groups and entities explicitly named in lawsuits related to USAID as of March 11, 2025:

1. Global Health Council
   • A health-focused organization that relies on USAID funding, it was involved in a lawsuit leading to a federal judge’s order on February 13, 2025, to temporarily lift the freeze on USAID funding. This group represents various health programs worldwide and was among the plaintiffs seeking to restore aid disbursements.
2. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (AVAC)
   • This New York-based nonprofit, focused on accelerating HIV prevention, was a plaintiff in litigation that reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The group challenged the administration’s freeze on foreign aid, arguing it caused irreparable harm to their operations and the communities they serve. The Supreme Court rejected the administration’s request to keep billions in aid frozen on March 5, 2025.
3. Chemonics International
   • An international development firm and major USAID contractor, Chemonics joined other organizations in a lawsuit filed on February 11, 2025, in federal court in Washington. The suit claimed the administration lacked legal authority to shut down USAID and withhold congressionally appropriated funds, affecting their delivery of $240 million worth of medicines and health supplies.
4. American Bar Association (ABA)
   • Though not a traditional aid group, the ABA contracts with USAID for various programs. It was part of the same February 11, 2025, lawsuit alongside Chemonics, contesting the administration’s actions as unlawful and disruptive to their operations.
5. Journalism Development Network
   • This nonprofit, focused on global journalism development, was another plaintiff in the litigation that escalated to the Supreme Court. It argued that the funding freeze halted critical work advancing U.S. interests abroad.
6. DAI Global
   • An international development company, DAI Global joined the Supreme Court case plaintiffs, highlighting the impact of terminated USAID contracts on their humanitarian and development efforts worldwide.
7. HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)
   • A refugee assistance organization, HIAS was also named among the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court filing, emphasizing the freeze’s threat to vulnerable populations they support through USAID funding.
8. Nonprofit Groups Represented in Broader Suits
   • Additional lawsuits mention unnamed nonprofits, such as those represented in a case by two associations for government employees (filed with affidavits on February 11, 2025), and others like the Norwegian Refugee Council, which, while not explicitly a plaintiff, reported severe impacts from the USAID cuts and may be indirectly involved through coalition efforts.

These lawsuits collectively argue that the Trump administration’s actions—such as freezing foreign aid on January 20, 2025, terminating over 90% of USAID contracts, and attempting to dismantle the agency—violate congressional authority, the Administrative Procedure Act, and contractual obligations. The named groups span health, development, legal, journalism, and refugee aid sectors, reflecting the broad impact of USAID’s operations.

Note that while some sources mention lawsuits by "nonprofit groups" or "contractors" without specifying all names, the above entities are explicitly identified across multiple reports. Other organizations, such as World Relief or Catholic Relief Services, have been heavily affected by USAID cuts but are not explicitly confirmed as plaintiffs in these specific suits as of the latest data. The legal landscape may evolve, with more groups potentially joining as cases progress.

"""""

Asked "who are the aid groups that sued over usaid"


List of Groups that sued over USAID.

1. https://globalhealth.org/

2. https://avac.org/

3. https://chemonics.com/#

4.

https://www.americanbar.org/

5. https://www.luminategroup.com/investee/occrp-1

6. https://www.dai.com/

7. https://hias.org/

8. Good Luck Nonprofit Groups Represented in Broader Suits
Basically Trump should appealed to Congress to fight it but nope he is KING TRUMP.
Fucking EO don't pass the test. Now all the forum monkey will act like they knew. Stupid chimps.
Trump Tard babies just cant understand how the laws work. Stupid ppl - chimps deserve stupid results.
If Trump and all of them were in the same room it would be a glory hole boner served to them by Trump on a daily basis.

What does it take to break through to Trump tards? THE LAW is the LAW. The real simple solution was PROVE FRAUD AND ARREST.

HIAS scares the shit out of them.

 

[Bob B]

They have to pay up on past contracts and continue to use the budget, but Rubio says he cut 83% of the programs from the department. Is there a list of what is still being funded?

..... and he also said the remaining programs are being moved to the State Department ...... So, USAID is virtually gone if not gone in name.

 

[Primal1]

At least the Muslims will have to start paying for their own terrorism. No more Democrat funding.

 

[D71]

At least the Muslims will have to start paying for their own terrorism. No more Democrat funding.

Did Israel get de-funded? Looks like Mossad

"""""

IDF chief finally acknowledges that Israel supplied weapons to Syrian rebels​

In interview with UK’s Sunday Times, outgoing army commander Gadi Eisenkot says Israel gave opposition groups light arms ‘for self-defense’​

By Judah Ari Gross """"""""

Loading…

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[Bob B]

Hmmm .... Interesting one here .... The only reason for this would be more to come.

 

[Bob B]

Dems want this idiot to run for Pres.

 

[Primal1]

Hmmm .... Interesting one here .... The only reason for this would be more to come.

View attachment 284162

Here's 28 million to Bidens staffers for their part in the scamdemic. How about some prison time and fines that dwarf the theft.

Biden Cronies Cash In: Vaccine Company Registered to a PO Box, Run by Ex-Biden Staffers, Received $28 MILLION in Admin’s Final Months | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Senator Joni Ernst raises alarms over a vaccine company linked to former Biden staffers that received $28 million in federal funding, questioning the legitimacy of its operations and demanding accountability from the administration.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[D71]

Thomas Massie The Only Person In The US Government To Stand Up To The Fake Pandemic.

Thomas Massie The Only Person In The US Government To Stand Up To The Fake Pandemic.

old.bitchute.com

 

[Coydon]

..... and he also said the remaining programs are being moved to the State Department ...... So, USAID is virtually gone if not gone in name.

View attachment 284140

Rubio's statement there was just hours before the SCOTUS ruling was issued. The ruling didn't specify details about the spending, just that the POTUS couldn't end USAID in general. If the Continuing Resolution is passed by the Senate, USAID will continue as it has been for at least another 6 months. I think this is one of the reasons Rand and Massie are calling BS on the CR and Trump's now seemingly pretentious assault on shit spending.

It seems like any programs Trump/Rubio try to stop with USAID will be subject to further litigation if the sub departments want to try and defend their existence in court, at least until congress changes the actual budget for it...

 

[D71]

Or 2026

 

[Coydon]

This is why Rfk Jr is cautioning AGAINST a bird flu vaccine for chickens ..... It's also why the vaccine manufacturers WANT it.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1898073072407617559

Here are the options for human vaccines currently approved in the US to address H5N1. Not sure if the humans or the birds are better off here, or maybe Socrates had the right idea with the hemlock smoothie...:

GSK’s Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Monovalent Vaccine was licensed in 2013 for use in all persons ages 6 months or older. Findings about this vaccine:
This vaccine contains thimerosal, with up to 1.25 mcg of mercury per pediatric dose. Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative that was removed from most routine childhood vaccines in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, and the United Kingdom as a “precautionary measure” in the early 2000s after claims it causes serious harm.
This vaccine also contains squalene, which has been linked to autoimmune disease.
The adult safety trial involved 4,561 subjects (3,422 active/1,139 placebo). GSK solicited adverse event data for only 7 days and tracked unsolicited events for one year, during which the vaccine group had 4 times the rate of new immune-mediated diseases.
The placebo-controlled pediatric safety trial involved only 838 children ages 6 months to 17 years (607 active/231 placebo).

Seqirus’s Audenz H5N1Monovalent Vaccine was licensed in 2020 for use in all persons ages 6 months or older. Findings about this vaccine:
The adult Phase 3 safety trial included 3,191 participants (2,395 active/796 placebo). Adverse events were solicited for only 7 days following vaccination and unsolicited reports were collected for up to one year, during which 11 deaths (0.5%) were reported in the active group and only 1 (0.1%) was reported in the placebo group.
The pediatric safety study consisted of only 329 children who received the active vaccine. It does not appear to have included a placebo group, and 26% of participants reported an adverse event within 21 days of vaccination.
The multi-dose vials of this vaccine contain thimerosal, with up to 25 mcg of mercury per adult or pediatric dose, and this vaccine contains squalene.

Sanofi Pasteur’s Influenza Virus Vaccine, H5N1, was licensed in 2007 for adults ages 18-64. Findings about this vaccine:
Licensing was based on a safety trial that included only 151 adults (103 active/48 placebo) and adverse event data was tracked for 56 days post-vaccination, during which there were 4 serious adverse events in the vaccine group, including 1 death.
This vaccine contains thimerosal, with approximately 50 mcg of mercury per adult dose.

Be on the lookout for "experts" to call for adoption of these and for the media to talk about what a whack-o RFK jr is to point out the sketchy trial results...

 

[D71]

Until mf'ers go to prison then it keeps on going ...... Let the Sentence serve the Crime - death penalties

 

[Coydon]

View attachment 284518

Until mf'ers go to prison then it keeps on going ...... Let the Sentence serve the Crime - death penalties

Are there laws that will put Gates behind bars? Seems like it would take Nuremberg gallows to deal with his ilk.

 

[D71]

Are there laws that will put Gates behind bars? Seems like it would take Nuremberg gallows to deal with his ilk.

You'd have to go back previous page to this post and others. Gates was also tied to Global which was tied to China.

Gates is more wrapped up in COVID then Musk is with Doge.

Post in thread 'Do We Need a Control Group?'

Mar 10, 2025

KNOWN IN 2020

"""""""

Vaccine Bait & Switch: As Millions Pulled From WHO, Trump Gives Billions To Gates-Founded GAVI​

Posted on July 7, 2020 AuthorDerrick BrozeComments(33)

In mid-May US President Donald Trump announced that the US would be ending their financial support for the World Health Organization (WHO) and COVID-19 relief. The move was lambasted in the mainstream press as an out of touch politician pulling funding from a vital global health organization during the middle of a pandemic. To Trump’s supporters the decision was met with the...

• D71

You stated earlier post that info in link was old news. That was my point as pointed out it was 1st term Trump admin working with Gates. Cutting WHO. Gates is knee deep in it. Both Trump and Gates are tied to Epstein. Probably tied Sean Diddy Combs with that vodka liquor deal.

These mf'ers are in same club. Why no one been arrested and probably won't. Trump had backing of we the ppl and fucked them

 

[aenyc]

How Covid “vaccines” paved the way for mRNA Cancer “vaccines”

The unprecedentedly speedy development and approval of the various Covid “vaccines” – most using previously unsuccessful mRNA technology – is considered a scientific miracle by ardent followers of The ScienceTM.

Many others – us included – see it another way: one of the greatest scams ever perpetrated against a scared public, and a potentially incredibly dangerous and even deadly one.

But the damage done by that process doesn’t stop at the Covid “vaccines” themselves, they have opened the door for more and more “vaccines” to be rushed to market. That includes potentially “bespoke cancer vaccines”, of which there are currently hundreds of medical trials taking place around the world.

Earlier today Wired published an interview with Lennard Lee, oncologist and director at the Ellison Institute of Technology in Oxford, headlined:

Covid Vaccines Have Paved the Way for Cancer Vaccines

It’s quite an interesting read.

For one thing, if I’m understanding Dr Lee’s words correctly, these products aren’t really “vaccines” [emphasis added]:

In the current trials, we do a biopsy of the patient, sequence the tissue, send it to the pharmaceutical company, and they design a personalized vaccine that’s bespoke to that patient’s cancer.

They don’t prevent people from getting cancer, they are used to treat people who already have cancer. Meaning they’re not “vaccines” in the true sense of the word at all.

This echoes the Covid “vaccines”, which are known to prevent neither infection nor transmission of “Covid”, but only “limit severity” (the reason they can’t prevent transmission or infection is that “Covid” doesn’t really exist, but we’ve covered that enough).

It seems the assault on words and their meanings that took place during Covid is going to have knock-on impacts for a long time yet. That, indeed, was the point.

Later, we learn just how fast all these cancer vaccines have been produced…

Cancer vaccines weren’t a proper field of research before the pandemic. There was nothing. Apart from one exception, pretty much every clinical trial had failed. With the pandemic, however, we proved that mRNA vaccines were possible.

Cancer vaccines were not a “proper field of research” before the pandemic. It was the *ahem* “success” of the Covid “vaccine” which spurred the creation of mRNA cancer vaccines, so they have existed for – at absolute most – three years. And Dr Lee expects them to be approved in less than five [emphasis added]:

…over the next six to 12 months, we will monitor the people in the trial and work out if there’s a difference between the people who took the cancer vaccine and the ones who didn’t. We’re hoping to have results by the end of the year or beginning of 2026. If it’s successful, we will have invented the first approved personalized mRNA vaccine, within only five years of the first licensed mRNA vaccine for Covid. That’s pretty impressive

We would use the word “unbelievable”.

It’s quite telling that he skips over the approval process and talks only of effectiveness rather than safety or side effects, don’t you think?

Of course, he has good reason to be confident; after all the UK government has essentially guaranteed a market for these products before the trials are even completed. Dr Lee says as much himself:

the UK government signed two partnerships: one with BioNTech to provide 10,000 patients with access to personalized cancer treatments by 2030, and a 10-year investment with Moderna in an innovation and technology center with capacity to produce up to 250 million vaccines.

At some points the interviewer actually asks some very pertinent questions.

During the pandemic, the UK was opening clinical trials in a matter of a few weeks. But before it used to take years to complete a clinical trial. What changed?

That’s an excellent question, one the good doctor is either unequipped or unwilling to answer [emphasis added].

It was really fascinating, because for many years, we believed that research is inherently slow. It used to take 20 years to get a drug to market. Most cancer patients, unfortunately, will succumb by the time a drug gets to market. We showed the world that it could be done in a year if you modernize your process, run parts of the process in parallel, and use digital tools.

See, they used to think research was “inherently slow”, but they were wrong. They just had to “modernize the process”.

For some reason the interviewer doesn’t feel the need to call out this vague non-answer, so we never learn what “the process” is, or how it was “modernized”. “Running in parallel” and “digital tools” are similarly unexplained.

The reader is left with no understanding of what that answer actually means in real terms. We are forced to guess.

“Running in parallel” obviously means doing things at the same time that used to be done one after the other, whether that means animal and human trials or some other parts of the “process” we can never know. Using “digital tools” probably means modelling studies and projections in place of data, but might mean something else.

“Modernising the process” is so loose a term it defies even interpretive guesswork. The answer is vague to the point of being meaningless. It’s something no one would ever accept in a real conversation…

“Wow Howard, you got your month’s work done in 15 minutes. How’d you manage that?”
“Oh, I just modernized the process.”
“…what the hell are you talking about Howard?”

But vague non-answers going unchallenged is par for the course in propaganda interviews such as this.

Of course, none of those non-answers actually addresses the real issue of collapsing the timeframe. The reason drug trials take so long is the need for long term safety data. The only way to have 5 or 10-year outcome data is to give someone the drug, then wait 5 or 10 years and see what happens.

You can’t modernize that, “run it in parallel” or use “digital tools” to model it.

In the UK, you set up the Cancer Vaccine Launch Pad at the end of 2022 to fast-track cancer vaccine trials. Why set up such an ambitious project right after the Covid pandemic?

This is another good question. The answer?

The pandemic was ending, the Omicron variant was much milder than previous variants, and everyone had had their vaccines. Research in the area of Covid vaccines was starting to close down, but companies like Moderna and BioNTech were trying to figure out what to do next, because there wasn’t going to be a need for a Covid vaccine market forever

Translation: Money.

With the end of the “pandemic”, mRNA vaccine manufacturers realised the money hose was about to be turned off and they would need a new one. Hence the new mRNA vaccines for the flu, monkeypox, RSV, HIV, bird flu and cancer – all within a couple of years.

And cancer is the big one.

You can’t underestimate how much money there is in cancer. Between screening and “treating” it is an industry worth over $400 billion per year and that’s only going up. (You could argue a lot of “screening” is about generating “cancer patients” to treat, but that’s another issue).

Those treatments have been a gold mine for Big Pharma. They take forever, they’re expensive, and if they kill you (which they do, a lot), the coroner will probably find you died of cancer (or “complications resulting from cancer”).

Indeed, the surgery/chemotherapy/radiation pipeline – “cut, poison, burn” – is so profitable that it makes me question how effective any cancer vaccine would ever be allowed to be, supposing it really existed.

After all, a cancer “vaccine” that works by “training the immune system” isn’t just an alternative treatment to chemo and radiation; it is diametrically opposed to them since the vaccine requires a healthy immune system and both those treatments destroy your immune system.

But we’re getting into speculation here – a different article for another time.

*

In conclusion, the Wired headline is entirely correct. Covid vaccines DID pave the way for mRNA cancer vaccines.

How?

• They changed the general understanding of what the word “vaccine” even means.
• They affirmed blind faith in “the science”.
• They normalised rushed (or skipped) testing and trial periods.
• They normnalised government approval without adequate safety testing
• And they created a market for mRNA products that never previously existed.

…but I’m sure any of that should be considered a good thing.

 

[Coydon]

You'd have to go back previous page to this post and others. Gates was also tied to Global which was tied to China.

Gates is more wrapped up in COVID then Musk is with Doge.

Post in thread 'Do We Need a Control Group?'

Mar 10, 2025

KNOWN IN 2020

"""""""

Vaccine Bait & Switch: As Millions Pulled From WHO, Trump Gives Billions To Gates-Founded GAVI​

Posted on July 7, 2020 AuthorDerrick BrozeComments(33)

In mid-May US President Donald Trump announced that the US would be ending their financial support for the World Health Organization (WHO) and COVID-19 relief. The move was lambasted in the mainstream press as an out of touch politician pulling funding from a vital global health organization during the middle of a pandemic. To Trump’s supporters the decision was met with the...

• D71

You stated earlier post that info in link was old news. That was my point as pointed out it was 1st term Trump admin working with Gates. Cutting WHO. Gates is knee deep in it. Both Trump and Gates are tied to Epstein. Probably tied Sean Diddy Combs with that vodka liquor deal.

These mf'ers are in same club. Why no one been arrested and probably won't. Trump had backing of we the ppl and fucked them

The point with Gates is he's doing crimes against humanity, but is he technically breaking any laws?

The point with Trump is he is part of the vaccine scuffle. He has dirt under his fingernails. Is he fighting for a side? Forget the old news, he had four years to reflect on the bullshit that was pushed at him in 2020. He has a whole new makeup to his supporters this time around. Is he abandoning a chunk of them?

What is he expecting to get back from Elllison, what did he talk to Gates about, is he happy with this shitty CR because it will continue to support GAVI or has that been ended?

 

[Bob B]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1900761385040056428

 

[Bob B]

The New York Times has even came ..... mostly ..... clean about the Covid scam "science" perpetrated.
The article is behind a paywall, so I'll just post what Jeff Childers had to say about the article this morning.

"This weekend, after the New York Times ran the most hypocritical and self-serving editorial in its highly questionable history, social media buzzed more angrily than a swarm of gypped bumblebees who were just told their permits for harvesting this wildflower patch expired that morning, and they would have to fly back downtown and apply for a new permit which would only take six to eight weeks. I hereby publish the Times’ sordid headline in all its original glory:



The “event” we were “misled about” referred to the “pandemic,” of course, that brief, ignoble patch of history squeezed betwixt the Time Before and the time of Everything After. It was so profoundly unpleasant that Hollywood has studiously avoided producing a single film or streaming series set in that dark time of lockdowns, beachgoing arrests, mask mandate confrontations, bureaucrats cowering behind ubiquitous plexiglass sneeze shields, streetside restaurant tables, and Orwellian uni-directional arrows taped onto grocery aisle floors. This way to disinfection, comrade.

Ms. Tufecki, who penned the Times’ late-arriving limited hangout, was a regular force on corporate media’s opinion pages during the pandemic. She is an AWFL Columbia University sociology professor — yes, that Columbia University — specializing in technological trends and digital misinformation and has been lauded as a “prominent voice during the pandemic.” Here’s a 2021 New Observer article glowingly praising her anti-disinformation efforts:



Lest you erroneously conclude that Zeynep (if that is her real name) was any kind of voice of reason during the pandemic, the “guidance” she challenged was the CDC’s early instructions that masks were not especially helpful. Here’s her 2020 New York Times op-ed arguing for more masking:



So it was especially ironic that Zeynep was selected to run this weekend’s reaction to the latest news confirming the covid virus originated not from pangolins, wet markets, or bat meat popsicles, but from the laboratory in Wuhan that we conspiracy theorists have been pointing at for over five years. The white-coated lambs of blame are finally being led to their scientific slaughter, and right in time for Easter.

“We have since learned,” Zeynep innocently observed, safely nestling herself amongst the royal we, “that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story.”

The way she described the unforgivable campaign by scientists and public health officials to hide the true origins of the virus — a critically important fact — makes it sound a whole lot like misinformation, which we have been repeatedly and violently instructed is the worst possible crime. Especially during a pandemic. So who really killed grandma?

Bypassing for the moment the flashes of righteous fury that appear like floating spots before the eyeballs when reading this quasi-confessional, we can also savor the comeuppance that public health and science are rightly experiencing as their handlers toss them under the supersonic bus of blame. “Perhaps,” Professor Zeynep darkly alleged, “we were misled on purpose.”

Zeynep told it straight. She described the criminal behavior of noted scientists and NIH officials who scrubbed emails, bought burner phones, held secret conferences, taught each other tricks about how to avoid public records exposure, and altogether conspired to manufacture a fake narrative of natural viral origin, even while warning each other that the damned thing must have leaked from the lab. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen, for example, wrote in the conspirators’ secret Slack channel, “The lab escape version of this is so friggin’ likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario.”

Then David Morens, senior advisor to Fauci himself, wrote to EcoHealth president Peter Daszak saying, “We’re all smart enough to know to never have smoking guns, and if we did, we wouldn’t put them in emails, and if we found them, we’d delete them.”

The Professor also described, without equivocation, how NGO darling Daszak drafted and circulated a natural origins letter while strategizing about how to hide his tracks and assuring his recruited team of signing scientists that it “will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person.” Meaning, himself. The Lancet published Daszak’s fake letter and has never retracted it.

“What else,” Zeynep rightly wondered, “is still being kept from us about the pandemic that half a decade ago changed all of our lives?”



Alas, the thrust of Zeynep’s article, perhaps unavoidable, was ultimately aimed only at “restoring trust in science.” The Professor called on scientists to come clean. “Only an honest conversation,” she weakly encouraged, “will lead us forward.” She did not explain why these proven public health liars should even be leading a Las Vegas drive-through wedding band, much less the effort to restore trust in themselves.

Nor did she call for any accountability, which after all is the only real way for trust to be truly restored. Officials enthusiastically threw pastors in jail for holding church services, with scientists cheering them on. So what now for those same scientists, who bought burner phones and traded email-deleting tips to evade public records laws while conspiring to defraud the public about the pandemic?

As Hillary famously asked, What difference, at this point, does it make? At bottom, Zeynep shared her biggest worries in a response to one of the article’s top-rated comments. The Professor prefers to look to the future, complaining that “now, we are frozen about lessening the odds of a lab leak causing the next pandemic.”

But who, or what, dear professor, is freezing us? Are we not frozen by the absence of accountability that your article studiously avoided mentioning? Have the unpunished scientific fraudsters gotten away with it scot-free? As communist-defending Joe Welsh asked American hero Joe McCarthy in 1954, “You’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”

Well, Zeynep? Preventing future lab-leaked pandemics is an admirable goal, but what part does decency play in the orchestrated public health cover-up you so eloquently described? Or does accountability only apply to those of us in the tier below your élite club?"

 

[fatjay]

Canada, eh?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1901526880106267088

 

[Bob B]

About 57,000 people also died from choking on food in the US during that same period.

 

[Bob B]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1902381768298152148

 

[D71]

Bob If Trump pushed another EUA Vaccine through and told you to get that vaccine, what would you do?

 

[Bob B]

RFK Jr says studies prove that the mercury from vaccines migrate to the brain in a very short amount of time and then stay there forever unless you undergo some sort of chelation process.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1902471520695263466

 

[Coydon]

RFK Jr says studies prove that the mercury from vaccines migrate to the brain in a very short amount of time and then stay there forever unless you undergo some sort of chelation process.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1902471520695263466

I believe not too long after Bobby's conversation with Offit he describes there, the vaccine industry stopped using harmful mercury in vaccines and started to call him a conspiracy theorist for claiming there is harmful mercury in vaccines...

 

[Bob B]

I believe not too long after Bobby's conversation with Offit he describes there, the vaccine industry stopped using harmful mercury in vaccines and started to call him a conspiracy theorist for claiming there is harmful mercury in vaccines...

When we start paying attention, the amount of scumbaggery taking place is staggering.

It's beginning to trigger my natural tendency to go reside on a mountain top somewhere far away from anyone else.