Unfortunately, the level of this blog (and not only this one) is really low. Those who are looking for an explanation for their problems can be amateurs, but those who give answers and explanations must be at least semi-professionals.
I have a 3-phase solar system with iSolar SMP 5 kW inverters. Unfortunately, last year lightning destroyed one of my inverters. Of course, EASUN no longer offers these models. After comparing all possible data, I decided to buy easun-smg-ii-6.2-kW. I have been monitoring the operation of this inverter for several weeks and comparing the results with the iSolar SMP 5 kW. Right from the start, I noticed the same shortcomings as remo.78. I do not use smartphone applications. I read the data from all inverters with Arduino and analyze it using the monitor in Arduino IDE. To display the output power, I have a 3-phase W-meter on the inverter outputs.
Results:
1. Even with higher loads and favorable insolation, the PV voltage never drops below 365 V
2. With charged batteries and a higher load, the output power on the W-meter is always about 200 W higher than the PV power
3. The same difference of about 200 W is also at medium load when the PV voltage is around 400 V
4. At low load, the difference is "only" about 150 W
Explanation:
1. The smg-ii series inverters clearly do not have a boost unit that raises the PV voltage above the minimum required voltage of 360 V, which is necessary for the inverter to produce 230 Veff even with poor insolation
2. The higher output power by 200 W is very likely a (wide) margin of safety for the off-grid mode. This indicates that the manufacturer does not master the dynamic adjustment of the inverter's power to changes in load and illumination.
3. The declared efficiency of the inverter is 95%. The actual efficiency of the system due to these major shortcomings is 80 - 85%, although the PV power is sufficient
4. It is even worse at low load, when the efficiency drops to only a few 10%
Conclusion: in a residential building, larger consumers are active only for a limited time. Several smaller consumers represent a permanent consumption of a few 100 W when the efficiency is lowest. The average efficiency is, in my opinion, 25-30% lower than the declared 95%. Unacceptable! The problem is the data about the device, which the manufacturer does not provide, thereby misleading customers.
Conclusion after conclusion: some will probably argue with these findings and conclusions of mine, but I have stated my opinion.