Okay, new to this forum, but I have been working this idea for awhile. My plan is to buy the new F150 Lightning and basically use it as a battery with a 13kW solar panel setup to run the house basically off grid. It will still be grid tied, but shouldn’t need the grid. Here is my thinking... assuming the propaganda the F150 is right… the F150 will cost around $55K and have approximately 155kW of battery able to push 9kW out (Estimates). The solar array will charge it during the day and the truck will run the house (including AC In Florida).
I would keep the truck for 3 years and the trade in for a new model… ensuring updating the batteries and getting the next gen updates in technology. Since I will keep my existing F150 for driving, the Lightning would have virtually no miles on it And should retain its value well.
why I think this makes sense… I don‘t need to put in a generator on the house (saving ~$25K), I don’t need a battery wall (saving ~$25K or more). I get the energy tax credit on the F150 offsetting the initial depreciation on a new vehicle.
It doesn’t have a cheap startup cost, but it is not that much more than the battery wall. All of this is predicted on the F150 Lightning doing what it says it can do… what am I missing?
I would keep the truck for 3 years and the trade in for a new model… ensuring updating the batteries and getting the next gen updates in technology. Since I will keep my existing F150 for driving, the Lightning would have virtually no miles on it And should retain its value well.
why I think this makes sense… I don‘t need to put in a generator on the house (saving ~$25K), I don’t need a battery wall (saving ~$25K or more). I get the energy tax credit on the F150 offsetting the initial depreciation on a new vehicle.
It doesn’t have a cheap startup cost, but it is not that much more than the battery wall. All of this is predicted on the F150 Lightning doing what it says it can do… what am I missing?