I went out on a mid winters day and faced and angled mine for the noontime sun and that's where I leaveHey! So walking around this morning on the farm as the sun was coming up. Would it make sense to face panels south east and south west like a V almost or plant them in line facing south? I have 1 acre for these so lots of room.
Once upon a time, a solar guru told me that the energy used in operating a tracking motor required the equivalent energy produced by one solar panel. Do you concur?Obviously tracking a perpendicular angle to the sun is always going to yield the best results but this can be difficult to achieve practically. I would suggest that overall you would not achieve much, if any, additional output positioning your array so and, in addition, you will likely require two SCCs, one for each 'direction', else suffer partial shading dragging your total output down.
...Would it make sense to ... [panel configuration ideas]...
7.8kW Array @ Key Largo | Annual kWh predicted for 23 340W LG panels | Equivalent # panels for ~12190 kWh |
fixed tilt (10°)* | 12,190 | 23 |
1 axis tracker (10°) | 14,415 | 20 |
2 axis tracker | 17,896 | 16 |
SAM is a great tool for playing around with those types of questions and quickly churning out the $ over the life cycle of the panels for your configuration. For example, regarding the Tracker....
Flat, Single, and Dual-Axis
Quick comparison from SAM...
7.8kW Array @ Key Largo Annual kWh predicted for 23 340W LG panels Equivalent # panels for ~12190 kWh fixed tilt (10°)* 12,190 23 1 axis tracker (10°) 14,415 20 2 axis tracker 17,896 16
So, for the given location/weather, a dual axis tracker with 5 less panels could provide the same output as a poorly configured array. It won't tell you how much power or maintenance it takes to keep tracker running though.
*Note that 10° is sub-optimal for the latitude but optimal for hurricane force winds (flat to the roof), so the two-axis tracker takes a big jump.