found this OP-ED on Reddit
Why NEMA 14-50 instead of 6-50 for EV charging?
TLDR: Because a confluence of stupidity.
Long answer: early EVs were shipped with "
Travel Units" meant to be kept in the trunk and used for opportunity charging on the road. Now which useful sockets are found
on the road?
- The common one (NEMA 5-15): lousy but everywhere.
- The 14-50 RV socket found at RV parks, the best place to get big power on the road.
For
correct application of this kit, see
this 2018 video of a Tesla going off-network, hard. For incorrect application of this kit, look in any EVer's garage LOL.
See, other EV makers rented Teslas, had no idea why Tesla provided that kit, and copied them without thought, in full Cargo Cult manner, and without providing
the full suite of alternative sockets for every other charging speed. And then, people get these things home that have ONLY a 15A/120V and 50A/240V plug.
What do these novices very reasonably say?
"Well, therefore, level 2 must be 50A!"
/smh not even wrong. More cargo cult.
But who corrects them?
On an RV, all loads are 120V so the RV can work at smaller "TT30" stands. So the neutral is very important there.
But because of this very unfortunate misconception, EVers want to install 14-50s also, and the socket must have neutral in case someone plugs in an RV. So there we are wasting money on neutrals.
And remember. All this is in pursuit of "cheap".
The cheapness is that the EV novice wants to use the provided "travel unit" instead of paying money for a wall unit, that would be much more versatile. The wall unit could be a) hardwired, avoiding a Hubbell socket and GFCI, and b) detuned to a more sensible charge rate like 12-16 amps @ 240V (3-4 kW) appropriate for every-night charging at home. And that 12-16A circuit is much, much easier to provision into a home, without any need for $4000 service upgrade.
So instead of 12/2 to a wall unit, easy peasy... they spend *actually more* on costly GFCI breaker to costly 6/3 cable to a costly Hubbell socket.
And don't forget that $4000 service upgrade. With some wall units, you can do
Load Management so the EV charging has no impact on the service at all.
But why 14-50 and not 6-50?
Yet more people in the parade of asshats. When NEMA was initially defining 6-30 (!), 14-30, 6-50 and 14-50... they
didn't even think about making the 6-50 be supercompatible with the 14-50 (so that 6-50 plugs would work in 14-50 sockets). Nor 6-30 plugs in 14-30 sockets - the concept never entered their minds. Had they done that, EV travel units would have shipped with 6-50 of course.
So how is that asshat? Because of what they did think about/fixate on. They wanted to make 14-30 and 14-50 be similar enough that sockets could use the same brass parts internally. And yes, one manufacturer offers a 14-30-50 socket with two plastic faceplates, and you install the L-shaped neutral if you want 14-30, or the I-shaped 14-50 neutral.
FRICKING GOLF CLAP.