Some say "Why" and some say "Why not?"
- Sep 21, 2019
I checked, no link to your claim. You must have gotten that 2nd hand off one of those quacky wacky websites and you just believed what you were told.I could provide a lot of them, but I'm sure your favourite search engine will do it more efficiently - and unobtrusively, for the thread.
LOL.. I have to ask this because I no longer give people the credit of understanding basic things in life..I could go on but if you cry wolf enough times people loose trust.
Well I may be dating myself but I was around during this time-frame. There are many more examples that I have personally seen as well. Whats with the apparent name calling?"quaky wacky" comments? With the exception of funerals I have not been in a church in many many decades. What does this have to do with the OPs question?? Thank you for sharing your point of view.I checked, no link to your claim. You must have gotten that 2nd hand off one of those quacky wacky websites and you just believed what you were told.
Please provide a link to that ridiculous claim.
I checked, no link to your claim.
So you're backing away from your initial ridiculous claim and trying to deflect attention with the Al Gore statement.. Got it.. Check.Not even a mention of Al Gore? Impressive "checking".
Anyway (what I've personally come to believe - after some twenty years' careful study of the subject - is, climate change is real. Human activity, and especially CO2, have no impact on it. Whatsoever) discussing dogma is a useless proposition. You basically get into Inquisition-like situations. What they call a "denier" is what they called a "heretic". No... discussion is really possible.
I'll just stop rising to the bait of this sort of thing, shall I.
I was just hoping a community of people who deals with photons and electrons in a practical way would be more sensible on this sort of subject.
Citing credible sources for claims you make is never obtrusive, its a basic requirement of making a contested claim/argument in good faith.I could provide a lot of them, but I'm sure your favourite search engine will do it more efficiently - and unobtrusively, for the thread.
That is what is called "Psychological Projection." A very clear example.. Who is Jim and Tammy Baker?? Huh? Had to google them.. Yikes.The climate change scam is a new religion espoused by zealot believers who cry heretic whenever they're challenged. Greta Thunberg's sneering indignation "how dare you".... spare me the theatre. I've seen better performances from Jim & Tammy Baker. Operators are standing by to take your donation so call now and pledge your faith. Have your credit card ready. I mostly sit back and laugh at the whole charade because that's all it's worth.
Also, those who challenge climate science are either: 1) Professional and educated scientists who decided to accept large sums of money (very few of them) to cast doubt, or 2) The types of people who wouldn't recognize the difference between atoms of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, if you LITERALLY drew them a diagram with crayons and cute colors.
More still does more harm. For those wanting a more detailed explanation see https://diysolarforum.com/threads/c...ith-a-battery-break-through.25299/post-368177....I accept we are at or near saturation for CO2 effect. More will have almost no effect....
True! They've always fallen within the margin of accuracy (upper/lower lines) and they're being improved all the time (more here). It's eerie how accurate they've been, here's the 2013 graph, the red dots are from me putting in the measured temperatures (click the image for the post)The IPCC's models are spot-on ;·)
Pfft. Ever heard of nuclear winter? There are dozens of plan "B"s from exploding WIll's backyard into the stratosphere with nukes to making aerosols from the oceans that can have immediate and drastic cooling actions. The problem with Plan Bs are they represent huge unknowns and as bad a global warming is we can survive it (they often don't solve all the problems either (e.g., ocean acidification)). That is they scare the bejesus out of us because global cooling is a lot harder problem to fix and the last time it happened we almost died off. The sensible thing to do is what we are doing (eg., eliminate what we've done to cause it (e.g., net-zero on three biggest, which in order are N2O, CH4, and CO2, (CFCs were even worse, but we banned those years ago to restore the ozone ))....[global warming] You can't stop it, you cant change it.