GXMnow
Solar Wizard
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 2,700
The diagram with the dual meter just looks bad. Even if you consume all the power you produce, and nothing from the grid, your consumption meter will show all of the power. It is up the them to decide how much they will compensate you for the power you produce and send out the second meter back to them. I know they did systems like that before there were smart meters, but this is an obvious rule to make solar electric far less economically viable.
There is no reason that the Enphase inverters would not work going to the separate meter. It is just a matter of how the utility will use the data for billing you. In the more normal installation like mine, if I am producing less power than I am using, my consumption meter just runs slower, so I only pay for the power I still need to buy. That is how it really should be. With the dual meters, your consumption meter reading will not change, it always will count the power you use in your house. You are basically feeding your power out to the whole neighborhood and selling your power to the utility, at whatever they feel like paying you for it. And I will bet it is far less than they are charging to use that power, even as you are making it.
If I was stuck with a utility that required that, I would certainly do a self consumption system with a battery bank and set it up for zero cell to the grid. Even with your dual meter setup, you could put the system on the second meter. Use a Hybrid type inverter system, with it's "grid" input connected to the production meter. Then it should also have a backup power output. Have that side feed a sub panel in your home for your "essential loads". Depending on the utility requirements, you may be able to just use some power on the second meter, or you could have an automatic transfer switch move the "essential loads" to the main meter when the batter runs low and can't supply it. This way, all the solar will run your loads, and charge up a battery while the sun shines. As the sun goes down, the battery runs your loads. If you made more than you use, the battery will still have some charge, and it may eventually top out, but more likely, the battery will run down, and if it get's too low, then you pull the power you need from the utility again. In many areas, a system like this is completely legal and does not require any special agreement with the utility since you are never pushing power out to them. You are just using less power from them. Many people do this without even contacting the utility.
My system is an Enphase grid tie setup and I did get a net meter agreement and can legally push up to 4,000 watts peak or 900 Kwh per month back to the grid. My utility is Southern California Edison, and it uses a single iTron smart meter. I have seen it counting backwards at up to 3,100 watts. But even with this setup, SCE has found ways to make it less valuable. They forced me to "Time of Use" billing so when I over produce, the power is cheap, and when the sun goes down and I need to buy power, the rate is double. Because of this, I am in the process of installing a Schneider XW-Pro battery based inverter/charger. It will be able to take all of my over production and store it in the battery bank. I will then use the battery power during the peak rate time and not buy any of the over priced power from my utility. The cost of the inverter and batteries will take about 12 years to pay off on the electric rate savings, so it really is not a financial help in that regard since the batteries will probably only last 10 years. But this setup will also give me backup power and keep the Enphase solar working with the grid down. With what I know now, I sort of wish I did the battery bank from the start and never got the net meter agreement. My old tiered power billing would be much cheaper than the Time of Use they stuck me on.
There is no reason that the Enphase inverters would not work going to the separate meter. It is just a matter of how the utility will use the data for billing you. In the more normal installation like mine, if I am producing less power than I am using, my consumption meter just runs slower, so I only pay for the power I still need to buy. That is how it really should be. With the dual meters, your consumption meter reading will not change, it always will count the power you use in your house. You are basically feeding your power out to the whole neighborhood and selling your power to the utility, at whatever they feel like paying you for it. And I will bet it is far less than they are charging to use that power, even as you are making it.
If I was stuck with a utility that required that, I would certainly do a self consumption system with a battery bank and set it up for zero cell to the grid. Even with your dual meter setup, you could put the system on the second meter. Use a Hybrid type inverter system, with it's "grid" input connected to the production meter. Then it should also have a backup power output. Have that side feed a sub panel in your home for your "essential loads". Depending on the utility requirements, you may be able to just use some power on the second meter, or you could have an automatic transfer switch move the "essential loads" to the main meter when the batter runs low and can't supply it. This way, all the solar will run your loads, and charge up a battery while the sun shines. As the sun goes down, the battery runs your loads. If you made more than you use, the battery will still have some charge, and it may eventually top out, but more likely, the battery will run down, and if it get's too low, then you pull the power you need from the utility again. In many areas, a system like this is completely legal and does not require any special agreement with the utility since you are never pushing power out to them. You are just using less power from them. Many people do this without even contacting the utility.
My system is an Enphase grid tie setup and I did get a net meter agreement and can legally push up to 4,000 watts peak or 900 Kwh per month back to the grid. My utility is Southern California Edison, and it uses a single iTron smart meter. I have seen it counting backwards at up to 3,100 watts. But even with this setup, SCE has found ways to make it less valuable. They forced me to "Time of Use" billing so when I over produce, the power is cheap, and when the sun goes down and I need to buy power, the rate is double. Because of this, I am in the process of installing a Schneider XW-Pro battery based inverter/charger. It will be able to take all of my over production and store it in the battery bank. I will then use the battery power during the peak rate time and not buy any of the over priced power from my utility. The cost of the inverter and batteries will take about 12 years to pay off on the electric rate savings, so it really is not a financial help in that regard since the batteries will probably only last 10 years. But this setup will also give me backup power and keep the Enphase solar working with the grid down. With what I know now, I sort of wish I did the battery bank from the start and never got the net meter agreement. My old tiered power billing would be much cheaper than the Time of Use they stuck me on.