Have used and contributed to resources. Didn't know about the Wiki. I always go to What's New. Thanks for the heads up.
Have used and contributed to resources. Didn't know about the Wiki. I always go to What's New. Thanks for the heads up.
thank you for contributing resources!Have used and contributed to resources. Didn't know about the Wiki. I always go to What's New. Thanks for the heads up.
A fury tree rodent with a cute fluffy tail, and no matter how hard one tries to keep them out of his (or hers) bird feeder, they always win.
I am a member of some real Nazi type moderated forums and they typically end up dying pretty quickly or are just no fun to be on.The post above wasn't directed at anyone in particular. No need to remove. I do appreciate the offer, thanks.
Why so angry? Did you not get the information you were looking for? Were you angry because it was *your* thread?Got me so pissed off I started this thread.
?THE RESULTS ARE IN FROM THE OLYMPICS!?
View attachment 82765
View attachment 82766
View attachment 82767
So I guess it will remain a free for all, leaving those of us that are actually wanting to seek and share knowledge in search of another source.
We found out scapegoat! Now the only remaining question is whether you weigh the same as a duck.
That's obvious... matching color schemes and fontI was trying to get an answer to why CATL cells look prettier in the moonlight than EVE ones
ᵃⁿᵈ ˢᵒᵐᵉ ᵖᵉᵒᵖˡᵉ ᵈᵒⁿ'ᵗ ʷᵃⁿᵗ ᵗᵒ ʷᵃˢᵗᵉ ˢᵖᵃᶜᵉ..........uoᴉʇuǝʇʇɐ ʇǝƃ oʇ ʇsnɾ ʇsod sʞʅoⅎ ǝɯoS
I agree that the word "Hijacking" implies malicious but that's the term that is used.As with most polls, the questions are inadequate.
The proper answer would be "not necessarily".
See, a certain amount of "drift" in a forum thread is pretty much inevitable.
You seem to think that if it drifts far enough, there's no way to bring it back on course. I disagree, there are many ways.
Now, "hijacking" implies somewhat malicious intent. But even if innocently done, you seem to think that it precludes meaningful replies to the original question(s). Now, I don't think that's necessarily true. If the discourse hadn't drifted, it would very likely have fizzled.
Meaning, nobody had any more "meaningful" things to say... anyway.
You can always try saying, hey, you peeps, I was trying to get an answer to why CATL cells look prettier in the moonlight than EVE ones, and now you're talking about moon phases, c'mon...
Which might bring about more "on track" replies, probably won't, and there's always things to be learned about moon phases anyway.
-