The suggestion by Luk88 makes sense to me.
I've had a close lightning strike once in my life while a teenager at my parent's house. The neighbor's tree was struck. I was standing by an open window in the kitchen. The window lit up with the lightning flash and at the same time I heard two snaps that sounded like electrical arcs right outside the window, then the thunderous boom. My parents have a ranch house with a french hip roof, so the guttering forms a loop around the roof. I assumed the snaps I heard were arcs on the gutter system. After the thunder, my mom yelled from the living room that she thought the TV had been ruined. I went and looked and saw that the picture was still displayed, but the colors were covered with blotches of purple, green and pink. I told her that we just need to turn it off and on so the degaussing coil would de-magnetize the screen (back in the days of CRTs). She looked at me like I'd just told her the flux capacitor was overcharged in the Delorean, so I power cycled the TV for her and it was back to normal.
So, I was a bit surprised that the emf from the lightning was low enough frequency to magnetize the TV and not destroy it, and I believe it was effectively picked up by a 20 by 40 foot loop of metal gutter.
The other consideration is if this installation would also minimize the radio frequency interference caused by pulsating DC current being drawn by the solar charge converter, which is a much higher frequency. I know in the National Electrical Code, it is required to run home AC wiring for each circuit so that the hot and neutral run the same path to reduce radio interference.
I'm sure there's room for endless debate on how much this wiring method would protect the solar system components, but I can't think of anything it might harm other than my pocket book.