With a 14.xxx fw update as well I presume?With a 15.xx fw update I suggest![]()

With a 14.xxx fw update as well I presume?With a 15.xx fw update I suggest![]()
Of what year, 3024?We will solve this problem,
At the latest by October.
Today is the 29th, you have 2 Days till October.We will solve this problem,
At the latest by October.
To be with a no-fuss BMS that will work for several years without having to tinker non-stop.
Doesnt work like that for me.Anything that does't need closed loop. It's what I do: the BMS is there to protect cells, the charge parameters are in the charge controller. There is no communication. This works perfectly fine and doesn't require any tinkering at all.
And how does it work when 2 of 3 packs are full and one pack gets 240A from inverter and the bms and fuses will blow out?Do you often use just one of the parallel packs with the others disconnected? Once they're in parallel, they'll sync together and are full and empty at the same time - even with different capacities in parallel. I have four (soon six) packs in parallel.
Typically this won't happen. As the battery fills, the resistance increases. This limits the amount that can actually flow to the battery. If 2 are filled and the 3rd is close to full then the amount than can get to the 3rd battery is reduced.And how does it work when 2 of 3 packs are full and one pack gets 240A from inverter and the bms and fuses will blow out?
The only way to get that sort of imbalance is for one of the pack's voltage's to be significantly different, and that can only happen if you connect a new pack with a lower/higher voltage and it will receive/send a high current from the other packs/inverter and start charging. Hence always make sure the pack you are about to connect matches voltage closely.And how does it work when 2 of 3 packs are full and one pack gets 240A from inverter and the bms and fuses will blow out?
This just doesn't happen but if it does you've got bigger problems.And how does it work when 2 of 3 packs are full and one pack gets 240A from inverter and the bms and fuses will blow out?
I am doing this for years, only practical experience is missing on the "parallel topic". That will come soon as I am building 3 new banks... Good to hear the running the Deye in Voltage mode is also a nice alternative.Prosier, stop wandering off topic. It's also clear you have a great deal more study to do, start a thread for that purpose please.
I have run complex banks with mixed chemistries & different capacities as do many others here. My refreshed bank is 6 packs soon to be 7 when completed to final.
JKBMS is the best. This thread is for "JKBMS inverter" which should be called "JK inverter bms" so it's less confusing... it doesn't seem to be a great release and is definitely having struggles, but it is completely unrelated to the regular jkbms that all the old videos/threads are about.Hello, it's all well and good to say that there are problems but which bms should we go towards then? (with Victron system) To be with a no-fuss BMS that will work for several years without having to tinker non-stop.
Check out Watts247 battery bank. He uses many different brands, capacities, and even chemistries.I am doing this for years, only practical experience is missing on the "parallel topic". That will come soon as I am building 3 new banks... Good to hear the running the Deye in Voltage mode is also a nice alternative.
I would be stunned if they cared enough for something pointless like that. This isn't DCS batteries in Australia lolSo.....I assume they gonna abuse DMCA to remove any "offending" links from search engine soon?![]()
You haven't see how far majority of those sellers in China mess around with their competitors.I would be stunned if they cared enough for something pointless like that. This isn't DCS batteries in Australia lol
I thought the JK Inverter BMS handles this case already since it can enable 10A charge current limit? So open loop still is fine in your example.And how does it work when 2 of 3 packs are full and one pack gets 240A from inverter and the bms and fuses will blow out?
Coming weeks I hope to have my system running. 3x BMS and Deye 12kw hybrid 3p. What Deye you have and what fw? I have now 15.26 on the JK but I cant find it online indeed.I found this thread too late, but now I already have two JKBMS.
I recently assembled a second battery, flashed v15.32 for both and I found a bug in the latest firmware for parallel connection.
The total charging and discharging currents on the DEYE inverter were constantly changing, as if someone was constantly disconnecting the slave battery. The SOC was also constantly changing, since it is different on both batteries due to different cells.
The SOC should be displayed as an average between the two batteries, but it constantly "fell" to display only the master battery.
Since I have a Homeassistant for monitoring both JKBMS and my DEYE inverter, everything was clearly visible on the graphs.
I tried everything, swapped the master and slave ... before rolling back the BMS firmware to v15.30, and then to v15.27.
And on v15.27 everything worked as expected.
View attachment 247715
But now I read in the first message that version 15.27 has some problems and can even break the BMS. Is it really so?
Should I roll back to v15.24?
In release logs.txt it is written that:
V15.26 Upgrade logs
1. Fixed a Bug about DEYE inverter CAN communication protocol.
I have a DEYE inverter. But version 15.26 is nowhere to be found. On the website of the respected off-grid-garage there is either 15.24 or 15.27.
Now I'm worried about which version to choose.
Deye SUN-6K-SG03LP1-EU.What Deye you have and what fw? I have now 15.26 on the JK but I cant find it online indeed.
But it turns out there is no choice now?:V15.24 is a relatively stable Firmware 15.23 Kills displays DO NOT USE. (note they still have 15.23 as most recent firmware om their site.)
V15.27 BORKS SOC and more and CAN brick BMS.