Zwy
Emperor Of Solar
How would they charge you if you are off grid and don't a connection or have a utility bill?Unless they get the PUC to sign off on it. Solar panels are easy to find with satellite images.
How would they charge you if you are off grid and don't a connection or have a utility bill?Unless they get the PUC to sign off on it. Solar panels are easy to find with satellite images.
I never was interested in interconnect, mainly due to playing by their rules if one did interconnect. For those bitching about such fees, you have to option to move to off grid.
Beats me, but that's what they put in their latest recommendations on solar installations. Not to say they'll get it (sure hope not!) but it doesn't hurt to ask, right?How would they charge you if you are off grid and don't a connection or have a utility bill?
My guess is they would make a bill for you, drop it in the mail and expect to be paid. If you don't, collections and possible legal enforcement if they can convince the government to make it that obnoxious when writing the legislation.How would they charge you if you are off grid and don't a connection or have a utility bill?
You have it buried in there somewhere.. Take a look at this and notice ZERO usage ..We don't have residential demand charge. Here is my bill 1425 kWh in September.
View attachment 249571
The point isn't the bitching. The point is that everybody moving to a system with battery backed up solar power systems able to cover their full energy needs isn't practical.
Much smaller systems that could be easily installed by anybody that could plug in a drier could greatly benefit the countries energy resilience if the power companies weren't actively fighting it the entire way.
You would do better to focus the energy on something constructive such as how to be off grid and practical.Don't get me wrong though, I like bitching.
I would think it would be hard to legally charge for something they didn't provide.Beats me, but that's what they put in their latest recommendations on solar installations. Not to say they'll get it (sure hope not!) but it doesn't hurt to ask, right?
No what you have is minimum base bill of $25 + tax. Demand charge is peak 30 min window (averaged) power load priced at $13.6 per kW in addition to energy and fuel charges. FPL business accounts pay that.You have it buried in there somewhere.. Take a look at this and notice ZERO usage ..
My guess is they would make a bill for you, drop it in the mail and expect to be paid.
You are confusing being tied to a utility with not being tied to a utility. In the former, they make the rules because you are the consumer. In the latter, you are not a consumer and thus not legally bound to them.If you don't, collections and possible legal enforcement if they can convince the government to make it that obnoxious when writing the legislation.
By the way, you are leaving 142 kWh of "free" energy unused every month. You should be able to use up your $15.45 minimum base bill amount with electricity usage and pay same exact amount you do now.Take a look at this and notice ZERO usage
Said the pot to the kettle. It's clearly a waste of your time to lecture me.. yet, here you are.You would do better to focus the energy on something constructive such as how to be off grid and practical.
I said no such thing. You have to really stretch my words to say that I'm calling people that build their own off grid system anything negative.Yes, all of us with off grid systems are not practical people, you are the only sane practical one?
I guess we should just bend over and take it then. No reason to even discuss it. This whole thread was pointless. Alabama Power can and will do anything they want with impunity.You are attempting to win against an entity much larger with more power and money than you will ever have. They will get what they want, just like any other robber baron in history.
On what legal grounds? The sun shines thru the windows of my house and creates light. I would be expected to now pay a fee on each window?
You are confusing being tied to a utility with not being tied to a utility. In the former, they make the rules because you are the consumer. In the latter, you are not a consumer and thus not legally bound to them.
Oh yes, that is correct. I miss understood the statement you made. They will find a way to get their money. just like the phone company did when land lines started going away. Just like today, you order internet and they "force" give you one for $15. that you will never use.No what you have is minimum base bill of $25 + tax. Demand charge is peak 30 min window (averaged) power load priced at $13.6 per kW in addition to energy and fuel charges. FPL business accounts pay that.
I understand your position.I was "asked rhetorically" if I was a communist earlier in the thread. I'm thinking about electricity for everybody, what's best for the overall system, not just what's best for one individual household. I appreciate your streak of rugged individualism though.
Said the pot to the kettle. It's clearly a waste of your time to lecture me.. yet, here you are.
I said no such thing. You have to really stretch my words to say that I'm calling people that build their own off grid system anything negative.
Yes, you are getting it now. The only way to not have to bend over is to quit playing their game with their rules.I guess we should just bend over and take it then. No reason to even discuss it. This whole thread was pointless. Alabama Power can and will do anything they want with impunity.
Meh, compared to other PoCos they aren't that bad as long as they don't get draconian on solar and don't meddle in state politics. What I want to know is how are you able to keep your bill $0 with only 4.4kW of solar in FL?They will find a way to get their money
You really believe a utility can send a homeowner a bill when the homeowner does not utilize the services the utility offers?By the legislation they would lobby to have passed so they could bill anybody with solar panels? We were speaking in hypotheticals for a proposed plan of theirs, not something already in place.
Thay show it in a weird way. That was 4.4kWh from grid used from power i sent to them, I send 15kwh and use 4kwh at night that month. I have not seen a bill from the day i turned on the system. I have 12.5K of panels, and 10Kwh inverter, runsat 50-70Kwh a dayMeh, compared to other PoCos they aren't that bad as long as they don't get draconian on solar and don't meddle in state politics. What I want to know is how are you able to keep your bill $0 with only 4.4kW of solar in FL?
You're guilty as "charged" but my bros in Alabama have batteries and they don't draw anything from the draconian grid.Thay show it in a weird way. That was 4.4kWh from grid used from power i sent to them, I send 15kwh and use 4kwh at night that month. I have not seen a bill from the day i turned on the system. I have 12.5K of panels, and 10Kwh inverter, runsat 50-70Kwh a day
This is like solar bro version of UnabomberGarbage collection service is obligatory in San Jose.
During the financial crisis with so many homes in default, bills weren't being paid.
So the city shifted garbage billing to the property tax rolls. They'll get their money eventually.
Except for condo complexes. Many units in default, and banks weren't paying it either.
So garbage is still billed separately to the HOA.
The government could tax everyone with solar panels if they wanted, unless there is a solar customer revolt (like Prop 13 property tax payer revolt.)
Or maybe someone would just do a Metcalf Power Station incident again? And keep doing it until they get off our backs?
![]()
Metcalf sniper attack - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org