Copper ground rods, and connected metal frames, are more attractive than wood, which is not very conductive.Those trees too... I know lightning is unpredictable but ...
Copper ground rods, and connected metal frames, are more attractive than wood, which is not very conductive.Those trees too... I know lightning is unpredictable but ...
But at few million volts... A piece of wet wood is barely different to a copper pipe (I guess).Copper ground rods, and connected metal frames, are more attractive than wood, which is not very conductive.
This seems to be "explained" as a branch of another lightning that goes through the tall object, but I saw lighting do enough weird things to know this is oversimplified. There is a lot about hot plasma we don't know.We're 1400' from a 500' tall broadcast tower, so in general, it acts as a lightning rod for the area, however, I've seen lighting strike the ground within 10' of a radio tower once (I used to work in the industry until retirement), so that obliterated my false notion that a tall metal object is always going to take the strike. Lightning can do strange things and almost demonically seem to "intentionally" hit where it wants, and not the "obvious" path of least resistance.
I would still like to know what it is they do in Taiwan to prevent a direct strike on a building. Someone once tried to explain it, but it wasn't at all clear to me. They have something like a lightning rod on the roof of the building, which is attached to something electrical that is supposed to oppose those "feelers"--keep them from forming. Whatever it does is somehow opposite to what would otherwise naturally occur. And it seems to work. I was in worse electrical storms in Taiwan than in most any place I've ever been, and the buildings were never struck. In many areas, America has better technology: but in some things, Taiwan puts America to shame. Perhaps this is one of them.But at few million volts... A piece of wet wood is barely different to a copper pipe (I guess).
I once watched a video where they filmed lightning with some special super sensitive and fast camera and what happens in a cloud to earth lightning is that as the potential rises milliseconds before the lightning every tall object starts shooting "feelers" up. These look like tiny lightning going upwards. Most of them don't connect with anything and die down. But one or more meet the breaking down ionised air channel coming in discrete steps from above branching out at each step and then boom. We have the lightning (that has some phases too like energy goes from the earth up first - called return stroke, then there is often secondary lightning in the same ionised channel) and so on.
Surge Protection Devices (SPD's) would protect from nearby lightning strike surges (lightning a few hundred feet away, hitting a tree for example), and they could protect from most grid surges (grid events, or lightning hitting grid components nearby), if you've layered these correctly. But, SPD's would probably not protect from a direct strike on the house or its systems.
Did you make sure your new generator doesn't have a neutral ground bond? These LF inverters only want L+L+G. It will fault if it it has the neutral hooked to ground.The Sungold inverter is the ONLY piece of gear that failed. Now, for total disclosure, we had just gotten an MEP803A military generator hauled in the day before on a trailer. I had just connected it with a longer extension cable to hook into the system. The generator itself was not grounded yet, as it was to be removed from the trailer and placed on a pad soon after arrival. The storm hit just hours later. The generator was supplying power to an EG4 Chargeverter and this Sungold (in charge mode). The lightning hit the east-facing panel array on our west hillside. At first, I'd thought it took out the Growatt SC4880 charge controller, as it had gone dark after that event.
Right, but i was referring to it being the first day that it was ran with your new generator. In post 8 you mentioned it was supplying power to the Chargeverter at the same time, this could raise battery voltage enough to keep the SG from going into charge mode at that time (depending on the settings).No, that was not the case. The charging setup was in use for over a year prior to the storm. All chargers worked reliably until til we got hit my lightning.
If anything was in the direct path of the strike, it would be my SC4880 charge controller, hooked directly to the array that was hit. It was not damaged at all. Only the SG product being used in charging mode. Because it was connected to wiring that went outdoors to the generator and that wiring probably was the antenna that brought the EMP into the system. Maybe if the SG wasn't chassis grounded to earth, it might have been okay, maybe not.
Not to be 'the one' but the eg4 is also manu in China. Some retailers like to advertise stateside customer service and may give the allusion of stateside manu products.The next day I found out that the array was putting out 11 volts. I determined that the bypass diodes had shorted and so I popped the covers and measured a few, but visual showed a bunch of exploded diodes. After removing all the diodes, the array was making 165V and the charge controller was working. This array had taken a direct hit and the charge controller survived. But the wiring some 90' away, from the generator to the charging equipment induced voltage from the EMP and took out the poorly designed Chinese inverter/charger, while the EG4 product was still functional.
In the end, Lightning does whatever it wants to. It does not care who made what.Well frankly everything is made in China these days. But the specifications are higher for some products. The EG4 uses telecom grade power supplies. Probably a bit beefier than the SG stuff.
Hard to say, but the heavy lifting is done internally by these server grade rectifier modules:Curious though, who makes the Chargeverter for EG4?
I guess I am suggesting back to basics and make sure there isn't something simple going on.