For the most part I've put together 12v kits to support my amateur (ham) radios and the normal "you need a battery in your car just in case" and will soon be receiving some some 3.2v 90ah batteries that I'll be assembling in a 12v circuit to provide field-expedient supplemental power for my radios, complete with a 12v 150w solar charge controller.
I then started thinking about building a home emergency power battery bank using 16 of the 280ah lifepo4 cells that are the new rage and my first thought was to go with the familiar, 12v, maybe a 40amp Rover Elite to provide solar recharge when suddenly math struck me like 3am chili. The main point of going to 24v (apart from smaller cable sizes) is the ability to double the charge compared to 12v.
Whereas before I could spend X amount of dollars and get a charge controller that'd accommodate 5 x 100w(ish) panels or roughly less than 4% of the total capacity (40a per hour of over 1100a @12v) , by going to 24v I could stay with the 5 panels allowed by that controller or I could throw money at the problem and double it to roughly 10% (by doubling the panels).
I'm ok with being a throw money at it kinda guy if it makes sense.
I looked - the 24v @ 150a bms is like ~$110-140 cheaper than buying a 12v @ 250a bms (Daly for both), with to me the difference being in a slight bump in getting a 3000w@24v vs 1500w@12v inverter and the roughly $100 for buying the step downs I want to go from 24v to 12v for the cig plugs, usb, and andersons.
So what am I missing? It seems to me that for roughly the same price or maybe a difference of $100ish, I get a system that is twice as upgradeable while having reduced costs in cable.
This almost seems too good to be true.
I then started thinking about building a home emergency power battery bank using 16 of the 280ah lifepo4 cells that are the new rage and my first thought was to go with the familiar, 12v, maybe a 40amp Rover Elite to provide solar recharge when suddenly math struck me like 3am chili. The main point of going to 24v (apart from smaller cable sizes) is the ability to double the charge compared to 12v.
Whereas before I could spend X amount of dollars and get a charge controller that'd accommodate 5 x 100w(ish) panels or roughly less than 4% of the total capacity (40a per hour of over 1100a @12v) , by going to 24v I could stay with the 5 panels allowed by that controller or I could throw money at the problem and double it to roughly 10% (by doubling the panels).
I'm ok with being a throw money at it kinda guy if it makes sense.
I looked - the 24v @ 150a bms is like ~$110-140 cheaper than buying a 12v @ 250a bms (Daly for both), with to me the difference being in a slight bump in getting a 3000w@24v vs 1500w@12v inverter and the roughly $100 for buying the step downs I want to go from 24v to 12v for the cig plugs, usb, and andersons.
So what am I missing? It seems to me that for roughly the same price or maybe a difference of $100ish, I get a system that is twice as upgradeable while having reduced costs in cable.
This almost seems too good to be true.