Frugal Devonian
Solar Enthusiast
My LF does the heavy lifting and has done faultlessly for six years,I think I read somewhere they are better in rough conditions too, humidity,dust etc.
I have several LF's and 3 HF's. one of the LF is a magnum 2012 it now has 12+ years of faultless service powering a fridge and basic amenities in a camper which runs 24-7.My LF does the heavy lifting and has done faultlessly for six years,I think I read somewhere they are better in rough conditions too, humidity,dust etc.
Heat pump is the next move. When I first bought my house in 2008 I went through a tank of oil a month, when oil was ~5/gal. That was over $1000/mo in oil for 4 months. I learned to get my wood stove in order for the next season, but also did a full clean of the furnace, and replaced the leaky single pane windows. Lots of sealing up on other stuff too, makes a huge difference.It’s almost always cheaper to reduce loads than increase solar production. I did the same thing here. Went to a heat pump water heater, put in a high seer heat pump mini split and a pellet stove. When we bought the house, it only had electric baseboard heat and a conventional electric water heater. My first electric bill in November of 2013 was $600.
My local masonic chapter didn't get the memo, they're all bitching about the price fixing as well.yep its that one world order... all of those Masons, Scottish Rite, York Rite and Shriner's... they be pulling those levers of power...
or maybe it is just a bunch of overly powerful industrial conglomerates figuring out who to pay in the government to get their hooks set properly so they can fleece you.
oh there are always corporate conglomerates with that much control... microsoft is a perfect example.My local masonic chapter didn't get the memo, they're all bitching about the price fixing as well.
There are to many moving parts, it's hard to imagine one group has taht much control, other groups would fight back.
+1 Brother.My local masonic chapter didn't get the memo, they're all bitching about the price fixing as well.
W C U?+1 Brother.
what kind of efficient things, like lights etc... would you recommend ?i did the same in regards to loads... being wood heated the next step was to eliminate that... as I get older the ability to split 10 or 12 cords would obviously decrease, even with a hydraulic wood splitter... first it was LED lights, then more of the newer LED lights. this had a surprising effect as event he original LED lights compared to incandescent s were amazing the. the 2nd gen LED were magic. everything after that was replace as it dies until I had for Japan anyways the best that could be had... jsut to find out it was pretty much a joke here anyways. BS marketing ploys and actual measurements made me shake my head. many of the older gear was just as efficient over 20 or 30 days. day to dy maybe not , but overall yeah... and they lasted longer. I have since slowly retrofitted with gear that is both efficient and long lived... do not let the siren song of false efficiency tkae your coin, as thats all it is sometimes a game to get your wealth.
If the SOC falls below 12 the CV cuts on. off at 15%. I use the genny relay in the 18kpv to knock a small ats and power it on from the grid. It is set to minimal voltage, max 80A/4KW. Big robust ATS is slow, if it all falls over it will kick in. I managed to produce 142KWH yesterday, still hit 100% SOC by 1430. Charged up car from 2% to 75, mined $3 worth of bitcoin, did some baking, and took a long hot shower. Might have issues this summer when the HVAC runs all night. We shall see.Ah OK, that makes a lot of sense. Fully off grid or dislike using any Grid, got it. The chargeverter threw me, was thinking you might be using grid to charge only.
Same could be said for IBM at one point.oh there are always corporate conglomerates with that much control... microsoft is a perfect example.
It's not irrelevant stupidity if you live off grid. 100 watts×24 hours is 2.4kwh per day.What idle numbers do you speak of? How is any idle power draw going to have any effect on a properly designed system? I people talk this irrelevant stupidity all the time. If you need to push 240v@28a you are not going to engineer for 6720w exactly of capacity, unless you are a blathering idiot. 100w would represent 1.6% more capacity than your load. Insignificant.
Too long did not read? go to the bottom For BLUFwhat kind of efficient things, like lights etc... would you recommend ?
Sorry, it's still irrelevant, because overhead is still overhead and the operational current of your inverter is simple overhead. There is no magic bullet, all these systems have some sort of drain, the percentage goes down the larger the inverter, and the overall loss from an HF vs an LF is much lower. If you want to live off-grid and have a 7 day reserve from your solar batteries . . . Let's look at my situation. At the moment I can get by with say 40KWH (That would be aggressively low) per day. Thus assuming some maximal gloom where I managed to get nothing I need 40x7 = 280KWH of batteries to last the week. And you are concerned about another 17KW? I think you just want a generator, not more batteries for an extended outage. If you are worrying about the operating current for your inverter you missed the mark on your engineering the overall percentage is nominal.It's not irrelevant stupidity if you live off grid. 100 watts×24 hours is 2.4kwh per day.
Plan for 7 days of rainy weather that is 16.8 kwh of extra battery needed.
Properly designed? Get ready to shell out another $4k for batteries
Disingenuous,. Your 4K LF inverter is not going to run a 5K load. If I get two 6K LF's now maybe I can start and run my load, but of course I'm going to be limited to about 50A/240v. OTOH, if I get 2x12000xp's, not only can I start and run the 5K load, but I have 75A of overhead for other high current items, like EV chargers, Hot water heaters, clothes dryer's.so by more products to make you HF inverter act somewhat like a LF inverter... Got it...
It's not irrelevant, more overhead is more overhead. Living off grid you need a HF inverter that is twice the size of a LF inverter. That is double the idle draw.Sorry, it's still irrelevant, because overhead is still overhead and the operational current of your inverter is simple overhead. There is no magic bullet, all these systems have some sort of drain, the percentage goes down the larger the inverter, and the overall loss from an HF vs an LF is much lower. If you want to live off-grid and have a 7 day reserve from your solar batteries . . . Let's look at my situation. At the moment I can get by with say 40KWH (That would be aggressively low) per day. Thus assuming some maximal gloom where I managed to get nothing I need 40x7 = 280KWH of batteries to last the week. And you are concerned about another 17KW? I think you just want a generator, not more batteries for an extended outage. If you are worrying about the operating current for your inverter you missed the mark on your engineering the overall percentage is nominal.
Thus I stand by my statement. It's all about demand, if you occasionally need 80A at 240v you need more inverter or life is going to be a shell game. If you want to be dumb, you better be tough. Buy as much battery as makes sense to handle the 90+% case, use a genny to make up the difference.
You are right, I don't know about every HF or LF, i have looked at specs of alot of HF and Low Frequency inverters and it seems like the idle draw is much higher on the HF"idle" draw (or rather, self-consumption as it isn't only there when idle) varies a lot by brand and model though. There are some HF inverters that have high self consumption higher than a good LF. Then there are others that don't, and two of the better HF may still not have that much draw. Example - my 8kw LF Outback Radian has a self-consumption of 34 watts, while a Voltronics lv6548 uses 70 watts. Part of that is because the Voltronics is an AIO so it has the MPPT integrated, while the Radian does not, but does the MPPT really account for all of it? Probably not. And the Radian will beat the ever-living snot out of the Voltronics. The Radian also costs more than the Voltronics.
My main point is that you can't make a blanket statement "LF vs HF idle consumption" because there's too many variables, and it is all a game of give-and-take.
On balance an inverter 'box' is going to use some of the power you get in order to operate. If you are off-grid that power amount should not be relevant, since as a percentage of your total use it's very small. If your engineering a system with tolerances that tight you made a huge mistake. If you only need 3KW to run your load, you buy a single 3KW box, likely with ~30-40W of idle power draw, and it has a linear effect on battery consumption. If you want to last your mythical '7-days' you still need 6720WH. You act like two boxes takes 15000WH but one box takes ZERO. Doesn't work that way. To SparkyJJO's point, it's not cut and dry either. You take loss every single time you convert power from A to B.It's not irrelevant, more overhead is more overhead. Living off grid you need a HF inverter that is twice the size of a LF inverter. That is double the idle draw.
It's very simple math, but it sounds like you have grid power so it doesn't matter to you.
I'm gonna put it in the same category as the 'run your ICE car on water' idea.I'm not sure about the mythical LF inverter with zero overhead that will start a 6KW inductive load, and still run the rest of your stuff, using no battery, but I'm all in to see the YouTube video.
My compressor is a Quincy QT 5 and with a soft start from SS, will not start either, in fact it made it worse. Buying another 18kpv to run as a pair probably would start but switching to the grid at the shop I can do while still being off grid at the house, cheaper result.More to add on the video above, versus my own test experience today with my air compressor.
Was wiring a disconnect input for the 18K from grid so the 18K can be taken out of the circuit, so it seemed like a good time to test whether the 18 K could handle the 80 gallon belt drive after being impressed by the video.
My results do not match the test they did above.
Had about a 3000 watt load on the 18K- with an additional 2KW coming in from PV, ( versus their 195 amps battery current draw already to support their existing loads with only one Power Pro, before they were able to successfully start the belt drive IR compressor)
I tried to start the 80 gallon two stage (6 hp start)- 5 HP running compressor and the compressor maybe rotated 1 revolution then Moaned and lights out.
The 18k shut down.
I immediately shut off the pressure switch on the compressor.
18K and lights came back up in about 5 seconds.
Now I have my answer, as far as ever running this compressor "Off Grid" without a soft start or adding another 18K PV the answer is no.
Air compressor? 6HP is a LOT of air compressor. 6HP motor is going to be borderline on that 18K. I'd put a soft-start on it.Well I did see a post by another member with a LF transformer based Schneider XW Pro and says it started a 6 HP air compressor without any problem.
I asked for details in that thread: whether it is a belt drive vs. direct drive, whether it is a single stage or two stage pump along with motor details.
Lots of use going on right now so I can't separate out the 18K immediately and just power my garage with no other loads but LED lights and see if can start the air compressor as it's only load.
Not sure about his magnums longer term output capabilities but here's the Schneider xw pro 6848:Disingenuous,. Your 4K LF inverter is not going to run a 5K load. If I get two 6K LF's now maybe I can start and run my load, but of course I'm going to be limited to about 50A/240v. OTOH, if I get 2x12000xp's, not only can I start and run the 5K load, but I have 75A of overhead for other high current items, like EV chargers, Hot water heaters, clothes dryer's.
The game is always covering demand, thus, based on your argument: if my demand gets as high as 100A I need either 4x6KW LF's or 2x12KW HF's. Last time I checked 4 > 2. YMMV.