Rarely buy new batteries - typically just automotive. Have never bought a new battery for off-grid storage.
You would get the most from them being the first owner. Of course for FLA, you'd be investing in maintenance rituals like checking SG with a hydrometer, doing the necessary EQ when needed and so forth. It's a lot of involvement in personal time to get the most from them, and when you start new, it's do-able. But most don't start out nor maintain them properly.
Right. And that's the same theory behind the desulfators. They emit high frequency pulses during charge (or float) and allegedly break it down. Problem is only the marketing material says it works. There's no data. I have tried a half dozen of them, and they've never worked.
There is data, but with a HUGE Caveat! A real catch-22. Hard sulfation physically expands and damages batteries internally, breaking grids, cracking interconnects, warping plates, and in extreme cases, totally bulging!
So the catch-22 is that even IF one got their batteries all cleaned up magically, what is left is a poor weakened zombie, totally unsuitable for its -original- use case. But you can "second life" it in another sub-c application like powering your walkway garden lights.
It's now in a different application category.
As you know, the high-voltage zapping is detrimental overall taking out valuable active material at the same time.
This is actually what lead to the frequency thing (typically 30khz or a wider sweep), by John Galt, rather than high-voltage zapping. Two known examples are the Pulsetech chargers, and the Battery-Minder chargers that do this with frequency, not voltage.
The idea is not to blast off the sulfate, but rather recharge it. Impossible once it hardens right? The way it is explained to consumers is that a "cleansing" takes place. Ridiculous. What they should say to us battery nerds is:
"In between the electrolyte and active material is what is known as the microscopic "interphase layer". If you can get through the interphase layer, you can recharge the material that is surrounded by a hard sulfated shell, rather than trying to use any form of zapping." Try explaining the interphase layer to the consumer. Eyes roll. Much like trying to explain the SEI layer to lithium battery users (bad analogy, but you know what I mean).
So, Pulsetech has the X-ray crystallography and data gathered from a university (Cincinatti?) Done by a university physicist, not a marketing or company droid. You don't find the FULL report easily any more. This was in the 80's or 90's last time I looked at it.
BUT - here's the thing. Most people try to revive dead-zombies where the expanding hard sulfate has already done it's damage! Hence if one wants to do it right, they use the Pulsetech or Battery-Minder in addition to proper maintenance! But usually what has preceeded their use are home grown methods first, like using arc-welder blasting, epsom salts, even aspirins, nevermind not being the first owner.
Personally, I just try to treat my batts as well as I can right from the start. And be the FIRST owner. Just wanted to add this info in case it interested anyone, since it goes all the way back to the John Galt patents who was dissatisfied with arc-welder zarping.
Disclaimer: to be absolutely honest, I will use a Pulsetech charger as a maintenance top off every once in awhile on my Optima AGM's. Not to revive them, but as part of a regular pm procedure. Kind of the whole thing to Pulsetech was to help AGM's, which are notorious for not getting fully charged by the end user. And it wasn't until it was fully explained about the need to get beyond the interphase-layer, which I understood well. But revive second-hand garbage? Not me. YMMV.