Why are the Eve better cells?" ... although the Eve’s are better cells, ... ".
Why are the Eve better cells?" ... although the Eve’s are better cells, ... ".
Better in that it’s like popular one and it’s the one to beat. I haven’t don’t any testing to confirm which is truly better. Although I think some would consider the other might be “B” grade. But the both seem to work for me.Why are the Eve better cells?
Hmm ...Better in that it’s like popular one and it’s the one to beat. I haven’t don’t any testing to confirm which is truly better. Although I think some would consider the other might be “B” grade. But the both seem to work for me.
That's how it works I guess. Why do you have an NHX? By all posts, EG4 is more popular. Wouldn't that be the right choice?Better in that it’s like popular one and it’s the one to beat. I haven’t don’t any testing to confirm which is truly better. Although I think some would consider the other might be “B” grade. But the both seem to work for me.
I'm not going to say Hithium is better than eve, or whatever else is out there, just that for our needs and the cost, I'd say it works as good as most anything else out there.That's how it works I guess. Why do you have an NHX? By all posts, EG4 is more popular. Wouldn't that be the right choice?
This isn't a popularity contest. Data matters. Thus far, it supports a reasonable conclusion that Hithium is on par with EVE cells. Hopefully we'll continue to get more data to draw further, informed conclusions.
Fair enough. I like the price point.I'm not going to say Hithium is better than eve, or whatever else is out there, just that for our needs and the cost, I'd say it works as good as most anything else out there.
Some would say eve is tier 2 compared to byd and catl.
That is awesome! And they are a bunch less $.Hmm ...
View attachment 261283
The Hithium test tested at 333ah. About 20ah more than the eve mb31 @314ah.
lol I like how you think. I just saw they were cheaper and had similar specs.That's how it works I guess. Why do you have an NHX? By all posts, EG4 is more popular. Wouldn't that be the right choice?
This isn't a popularity contest. Data matters. Thus far, it supports a reasonable conclusion that Hithium is on par with EVE cells. Hopefully we'll continue to get more data to draw further, informed conclusions.
I'm looking forward to seeing more in the NHX.lol I like how you think. I just saw they were cheaper and had similar specs.
@JohnGyver
@mciholas
@menchelke
can you verify that there is passthru on the NHX10k/NHX12k and how much please ? I am studying.
thank you
Install looks like it’s coming along well!*** Installation Update ***
For those who are considering the NHX-12k... here are some pics and details;
View attachment 267623
View attachment 267624
View attachment 267625
I have an email into Ian as well as Korn about this "convertible" panel concept that I did. By using a generator interlock kit I can toggle the panel to be either a critical loads panel for the inverter or a normal sub panel. My question is whether the neutral and ground from the main panel feeding in as a sub panel will cause an issue when toggled over to a critical loads panel which will be fed by the inverter's neutral and ground. I am thinking that maybe the ground and/or neutral may create some sort of unwanted loop that may cause an issue with the inverter... and I don't want that. Worst case scenario is I will manually unwire the neutral and ground and set it aside in the panel for future reconnection when I need to convert it back to a sub panel. This concept is for future maintenance (software updates) or equipment issues, allowing me to get my house on the grid (off inverter) if an issue arises with something in the solar system. If anyone has any thoughts about this concept please chime in!I am only a seasoned novice after all!
I am very energy efficient on all my 120v circuits. My entire house will pull maybe 140A at peak with all loads, including EV charging, AC, pool pump and 3 sub panels off a 200A service. Most of the heavy loads are still on the main panel. The critical loads panels just has the lighter stuff like outlets, fans and lights. My heaviest load is my well pump which only draws about 22A when in use, water is critical! It may look like the critical loads panel has a lot but actual daily usage is very low, per my Emporia energy monitor that I used on the main panel leading up to this.
View attachment 267627
With the cold weather starting up Sunday down here in the Houston area I want to get it fired up so we stay up and running (and warm) in case the grid goes down. Oddly enough, we had two short 5 hour and 8 hour power outages in the last month... and that got old pretty quick. I want to avoid stuff like that going forward so getting this system going this weekend is the plan!
I hope it's as easy as all the YouTube videos about the NHX-10k are!
John
Install looks like it’s coming along well!
I’m no electrician, so I don’t know the proper way to do this, but I would try to avoid having the grounds and neutrals land in the “combiner panel” from both your main panel and the inverter (since the inverter will also have a ground and neutral from the main panel).
Hopefully someone with actual knowledge of the situation can comment. Maybe @timselectric can help?
Awesome work! Congrats and enjoy providing your own power!*** Install Update, It's up & running! ***
I have the NHX-12k up and running! My grid tie and critical loads panels are connected.... most of my house is now wired to solar! I still need 2 more batteries and 24 more panels added to get to where I think I will need to be. That will put me in the 14.4kw solar input range on 3 of the 4 MPPT's. I can expand by an additional 4.8kw on the 4th MPPT if needed.
Concerning the "convertible critical loads / sub panel".... I disconnected the sub panel neutral and ground and isolated them inside the critical loads panel for future use, if ever needed (see pic). It will be a manual process, but it's there ready for the conversion if ever needed for solar system maintenance, warranty issues, software updates, etc.
The Ruixu battery and inverter communicated out of the gate after setting the battery to "Megarevo" as the chosen manufacturer that it will pair up with. It was very simple.
I am putting the NHX-12k through its paces now.... it's very cool to see early morning solar coming in and being processed to the house and battery!
I still have a ton of finish work to do, including digging 250 feet of trenches for the solar wiring, a bit of rewire in the main panel and mounting the DC circuit breaker box with Midnite Solar surge protectors, conduit and all the other fun details!
View attachment 267916
View attachment 267917
View attachment 267918
I do plan to get very familiar with my NHX-12k. I hope to be a resource in the future for anyone considering this unit. I will post pics of the finished shed and inverter as I get stage 1 completed and as I add more batteries and solar I will post updated pics as well.
I do want to give a shout out to @Gavin Stone, @Adam De Lay and @Kornbread for helping me understand many things up to this point. The knowledge sharing on this forum is invaluable and I greatly appreciate so many insightful posts, YouTube videos and private emails and messages. I could not have tackled this project without the knowledge and assistance. I do hope to pay it forward as I go from novice to a more seasoned solar guy, at least with the NHX-12k and Ruixu Lithi2 batteries.
Best to all in 2025... Happy New Years!
John
Why would you isolate the grounds? Seems to me that grounds can be connected without any issue and there's no prohibition on multiple ground paths. I also think it is weird to have any ground wires left floating, it will freak out future persons looking at your setup.Concerning the "convertible critical loads / sub panel".... I disconnected the sub panel neutral and ground and isolated them inside the critical loads panel for future use, if ever needed (see pic).
What is the behavior when the battery reaches 100% SoC?The Ruixu battery and inverter communicated out of the gate after setting the battery to "Megarevo" as the chosen manufacturer that it will pair up with. It was very simple.
To add to this, I don't believe, based on having done something similar and advice I got here, this is a correct setup. You must carry the neutral and ground from your main panel (where they are bonded). They should attach to their own buss bars in the sub panel, but they should be connected.Why would you isolate the grounds? Seems to me that grounds can be connected without any issue and there's no prohibition on multiple ground paths. I also think it is weird to have any ground wires left floating, it will freak out future persons looking at your setup.
This is partly why I tagged Tim; I don't want to spread misinformation. However, my understanding is yours. By providing an alternate path, whatever is on that path will have a different potential to ground than the main ground in the MSP which is, I believe, what you want to avoid. The CL panel is still part of the larger electrical system. Its neutral and ground should -- to the best of my understanding -- be tied to the neutral and ground for the system/property. And for clarity -- since it is a sub panel, it should *not* be bonded there. Separate conductors for the neutral and ground buss bars, from the MSP.See this is where I start getting confused. Would be happy to be corrected.
The CL panel has both a G and N coming from his MSP (to the right of the image) as well as his inverter (to the left of the image). At the bottom of the image, you can see his main grid lines (including G and N) passing through the CL panel from his MSP to his inverter. When I look at that, I see multiple paths for both the G and N because the CL is still connected to the MSP. I always thought multiple paths were bad and you wanted a single path for both G and N?
Multiple paths for ground are okay. You can tie grounds all together in any way you want so long as there is only one neutral to ground bond and there is only one ground rod earthing set (sometimes more than one is used but they form one tie point). Keep ground all tied together.I always thought multiple paths were bad and you wanted a single path for both G and N?
Makes sense. You would think there has to be some way to be code compliant.Multiple paths for ground are okay. You can tie grounds all together in any way you want so long as there is only one neutral to ground bond and there is only one ground rod earthing set (sometimes more than one is used but they form one tie point). Keep ground all tied together.
The confusing part is the neutral. The idealistic directive is that the neutral must ride along with the hots so the instantaneous current sums to zero in all 3 wires. That is, all the current flowing out equals all the current flowing in.
The problem with that is when you have a panel like the critical loads panel that can be powered from two sources, the grid and the inverter. Generally, you switch only the hots as shown in the above image. The "main" breaker is the inverter load switch, the top right branch breaker is the grid bypass connection. There is an interlock between them (not shown, typically mounted to the panel cover) which assures only one is turned on at a time.
The problem now is what to do with the neutral. There is no switch to move it from grid to inverter, so do you tie grid neutral to the panel, or inverter neutral to the panel? In my view, you tie both. This means there are three neutral connections, main to inverter, inverter to critical, critical to main. Now the neutral has a loop in it and some neutral current may flow in the grid to critical line even though the hots are not active. Or, the critical to inverter neutral might carry some current when on grid bypass.
Electrically, this is harmless, but others will argue it is not code. You then ask them to draw out something that would be code compliant to the idealism of neutral with its hots rule, and they can't do it unless they add a neutral switch which creates a host of other problems. So that's where we are.
In the above photo, effectively the neutral line is doubled, two come from the main panel, two come from the inverter, and one of the lines taps into the critical panel. Since the main to critical and critical to inverter lines are run in the same conduit, the sum of *ALL* the currents in those conduits is zero (two sets of hots and neutral in each one). That is as close to the ideal as you can get.
In short, tie the grounds all together any way you want, and tie the neutrals in the critical panel. That works the best.
Mike C.