I don't disagree with you that basic electrical safety is extremely important. And I really appreciate and respect your willingness to engage in this discussion. Something I've always respected about you. I just think that there is almost no pushback against the crazier new regulations, and I wonder if there is a correlation between midnite catering to some of them and the extreme slowdown of innovation on new product development.
Specific solar regs I see as useless:
1 Enclosing all wiring in listed boxes between system components. I fail to see how this is safer than running exposed insulated wires
Well, there must be SOME reason the NEC requires this and has for I don't know how long ?
May I suggest you find the NFPA NEC code for some time within the last 10 years or so and see what it requires ? Wires in conduit and a proper way of connecting those wires is usually required and the boxes they go in to must have the proper UL/ETL/CSA listings to the UL specification. UL I admit is basically the mafia in this regard. I won't go in to that here though
2 module level rapid shutdown systems especially on ground mounted arrays this is just insane
If you mount your PV array on a pole (and also the ground ?) then module level rapid shutdown is not required. Usually only rooftop mounted solar is required. That should be in the NEC for the last few years. You can download the NEC and even most recent if you do a search. It might take the right search parameters to find it. Or it can be bought of course as a printed version.
I agree that module level shutdown is really not much safer but it might actually cause more fires for firefighters to put out. There is no mention of how many volts one of those modules might have if a firefighter actually plunges a hatchet in to it. There are 100V modules now even. More cells might be coming ? I don't know
DC arc fault protection is probably more useful than ground fault but both are required additions. Arc fault is nice but it is really hard to do so that it actually detects an arc and doesn't false trip. Hedges is correct that it can require FFTs but there are also other ways. It's really an audio DSP problem to detect arcs and and ignore the switching noise as well as module level shutdown if it is done by using a current-carrier or data over power (PV-DC) line for the modules to detect.
All this information on the PV lines when it just used to be DC current and voltage.
4 array ground dc bonding
This too me is not only counter intuitive it is actually dangerous in that if I accidently make contact with an array positive im almost guaranteed to be a path to ground especially with a high voltage array.
That is what ground fault is for. But I don't think you are supposed to ground the PV lines ? Again, this is in the NEC book.
Non-Isolated MPPT systems are grounded at the AC source or inverter if it is the main power provider.
All of the newer non-grounded PV systems are non-isolated and cannot be grounded anywhere on the PV side of course.
I just wonder if there is a direct link between the lack of innovation on the much harder real product development and easy money cranking out ul listed enclosures etc
Well, we (MidNite) engineering are doing almost 100% innovation these days. It is just incredibly difficult doing what we are trying to do now and we have a LOT of people (20+) working on these new products. Most of that is software and even it is hard to coordinate everything.
The hardware is incredibly hard to get right especially for what MidNite is trying to do. MidNite is NOT a rich company with unlimited funds kind of like Elon Musk's Space-X or Tesla Motors. I really wish we could hire a bit of talent that he has gotten ! I am very impressed !
But the new stuff is not going to be obsolete any time soon but you are absolutely correct that we blow the horn on products way too early. Talk is cheap I guess. The enclosures we make (BOS or Balance Of Systems) and charge controllers and SPDs do help us to keep working on the new products but I will say, buying parts for the new products really drain resources. And a lot of parts are still very hard to get. Chips and way more.
Very little design effort go into the BOS products that have been shipping for years but there are a couple that we have to work on but is mainly mechanical design and UL/ETL certification which is also NOT cheap or fast. Can't sell this stuff really, without NRTL certs.
Also, I like your idea of the high-leg configuration for inverters. First, have to start with a 3 phase inverter system and the rest can be done with a simple tapped transformer I believe. One of our building we had a few years ago had that high-leg system which is where I found it.
Not sure if a lot of consumers would need 3-phase power though to go with the 120/240 VAC ? I know that it is common (or was common) in Alaskan fishing and canning operations.
Back to work on B17 hardware... I have been working on a real doozie of a problem lately regarding AC input and what you would think is simple issues. Sometimes when you are getting down to the last little details, the hardest parts come out to haunt you. I'll get it though.
The B17 is already pretty awesome when you see how it works as well as the other products we are working on.
Older large 60Hz transformer inverters are easy compared to what we are doing but after OutBack, we were not able to do that kind of inverter for several years. I wish this HF stuff was easy, but it's far from it.
boB