On line monitoring shows 12.4kWp installed, nameplate is 18.3kWp. Last years total was 14300kWh.
Using 14300/12.4=1193kWh, better than all local systems
Using " " /18.3= 793kWh worse than all local systems.
I asked the dealer and he tells me its a different way to measure something about AC vs DC.
Can anyone explain this? This will fool anyone using this as a comparison in my opinion, that this is the best system.
Grant money installed solar on 3 public buildings, one south facing the other two combinations of E/W. The south facing
always showed nameplate, my questions led to one building be changed to nameplate, no one remaining building continues as
above. How many ways are there to show on line monitoring installed kWp?
Using 14300/12.4=1193kWh, better than all local systems
Using " " /18.3= 793kWh worse than all local systems.
I asked the dealer and he tells me its a different way to measure something about AC vs DC.
Can anyone explain this? This will fool anyone using this as a comparison in my opinion, that this is the best system.
Grant money installed solar on 3 public buildings, one south facing the other two combinations of E/W. The south facing
always showed nameplate, my questions led to one building be changed to nameplate, no one remaining building continues as
above. How many ways are there to show on line monitoring installed kWp?