diy solar

diy solar

Possible increase of heart attack risk after mRNA vaccine.

Let's hear more about the pros and cons, and heart science that may or may not come these mRna vaccines! I'm always curious, afterall it is THE foremost and unsettled topic of our current time!

From the American Heart Association; "Specifically, there are several typographical errors, there is no data in the abstract regarding myocardial T-cell infiltration, there are no statistical analyses for significance provided, and the author is not clear that only anecdotal data was used."

 
Yea seems the thread topic, rings true, possibly But what possibility. Probably such a low probability along with so many other individual health factors as with any vaccine....
The aha journal site study as far as conclusions go is incomplete based on that publication. Well see if they fix the errors/omissions.
 
When you study the Pentatuch, the first five books of the Bible, you understand that it is put together by several authors. Further study allows you to identify these authors by their style. It's a composite. So too the New Testament. Now, this is neither an acceptance or a denial of a historical Jesus, but it certainly points to an understanding of how these texts are put together. Now, add to that the heavy editing done by the Catholic Church in order to maintain power, and the understanding becomes more clear. How does this person speak so amazing <sic>? Because it's a retelling of the story that has been heavily vetted and edited.
As per lefties, Jesus was the original socialist hippy. I would refer you to Galicians.
Maybe you should read what both sides think so you can realize one side is lying ?

Has the Bible been Corrupted over the last 2000 Years ?

Through the centuries, minor differences arose in the various copies of the Scriptures. The vast majority of these differences are simple spelling variants (akin to American neighbor versus British neighbour), inverted words (one manuscript says “Christ Jesus” while another says “Jesus Christ”), or an easily identified missing word. In short, over 99 percent of the biblical text is not questioned. Of the less than 1 percent of the text that is in question, no doctrinal teaching or command is jeopardized. In other words, the copies of the Bible we have today are pure. The Bible has not been corrupted, altered, edited, revised, or tampered with.

Any unbiased document scholar will agree that the Bible has been remarkably well-preserved over the centuries. Copies of the Bible dating to the 14th century AD are nearly identical in content to copies from the 3rd century AD. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, scholars were shocked to see how similar they were to other ancient copies of the Old Testament, even though the Dead Sea Scrolls were hundreds of years older than anything previously discovered. Even many hardened skeptics and critics of the Bible admit that the Bible has been transmitted over the centuries far more accurately than any other ancient document.

There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.
 

Biden Administration Suffers Setbacks for Vaccine Mandates​

In a setback to the Biden Administration, CBS News is reporting a federal judge in Missouri temporarily blocked the government-mandated vaccine requirement for health care workers. U.S. Judge Matthew Schelp of the federal district court in St. Louis said that the 10 states who challenged the mandate would likely “succeed on the merits of their case.”

Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming all sued the federal government over the mandate. The suit was led by two states’ Attorney General, Eric Schmitt of Missouri, and Doug Peterson of Nebraska. In their suit, the 10 states said the Biden mandate violates the Constitution and federal law. The lawsuit centered around rules issued in November from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) mandating workers at facilities funded by the government agencies must get a first dose of the covid vaccine by December 6th and be fully vaccinated by January 4th. The mandate did not allow weekly testing for any of the federal health care workers.

 
Maybe you should read what both sides think so you can realize one side is lying ?

Has the Bible been Corrupted over the last 2000 Years ?

Through the centuries, minor differences arose in the various copies of the Scriptures. The vast majority of these differences are simple spelling variants (akin to American neighbor versus British neighbour), inverted words (one manuscript says “Christ Jesus” while another says “Jesus Christ”), or an easily identified missing word. In short, over 99 percent of the biblical text is not questioned. Of the less than 1 percent of the text that is in question, no doctrinal teaching or command is jeopardized. In other words, the copies of the Bible we have today are pure. The Bible has not been corrupted, altered, edited, revised, or tampered with.

Any unbiased document scholar will agree that the Bible has been remarkably well-preserved over the centuries. Copies of the Bible dating to the 14th century AD are nearly identical in content to copies from the 3rd century AD. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, scholars were shocked to see how similar they were to other ancient copies of the Old Testament, even though the Dead Sea Scrolls were hundreds of years older than anything previously discovered. Even many hardened skeptics and critics of the Bible admit that the Bible has been transmitted over the centuries far more accurately than any other ancient document.

There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.
You went to "gotquestions.org", which is owned by a church, to look for evidence that the bible has been tampered with by the church?

ROFLMAO

See, that's what I was just saying earlier.... Religion removes the capacity for logical analysis.

You have earned the glorious Laughing Duck Award (And I don't hand these out to just anyone)
1638408549208.gif
 
Maybe you should read what both sides think so you can realize one side is lying ?

Has the Bible been Corrupted over the last 2000 Years ?

Through the centuries, minor differences arose in the various copies of the Scriptures. The vast majority of these differences are simple spelling variants (akin to American neighbor versus British neighbour), inverted words (one manuscript says “Christ Jesus” while another says “Jesus Christ”), or an easily identified missing word. In short, over 99 percent of the biblical text is not questioned. Of the less than 1 percent of the text that is in question, no doctrinal teaching or command is jeopardized. In other words, the copies of the Bible we have today are pure. The Bible has not been corrupted, altered, edited, revised, or tampered with.

Any unbiased document scholar will agree that the Bible has been remarkably well-preserved over the centuries. Copies of the Bible dating to the 14th century AD are nearly identical in content to copies from the 3rd century AD. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, scholars were shocked to see how similar they were to other ancient copies of the Old Testament, even though the Dead Sea Scrolls were hundreds of years older than anything previously discovered. Even many hardened skeptics and critics of the Bible admit that the Bible has been transmitted over the centuries far more accurately than any other ancient document.

There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.
Praise God! Nothing has corrupted the message of his sadistic hatred for the majority of mankind. Fuk your couch Egyptian, I've hardened your heart so I can cover it with blood!
 

Biden Administration Suffers Setbacks for Vaccine Mandates​

In a setback to the Biden Administration, CBS News is reporting a federal judge in Missouri temporarily blocked the government-mandated vaccine requirement for health care workers. U.S. Judge Matthew Schelp of the federal district court in St. Louis said that the 10 states who challenged the mandate would likely “succeed on the merits of their case.”

Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming all sued the federal government over the mandate. The suit was led by two states’ Attorney General, Eric Schmitt of Missouri, and Doug Peterson of Nebraska. In their suit, the 10 states said the Biden mandate violates the Constitution and federal law. The lawsuit centered around rules issued in November from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) mandating workers at facilities funded by the government agencies must get a first dose of the covid vaccine by December 6th and be fully vaccinated by January 4th. The mandate did not allow weekly testing for any of the federal health care workers.

Thanks for bold facing two-day old news.

What is next? Japan Surrenders !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Arguing religion with atheists? When will evangelicals learn that they can not win that argument?

There is so much evil in the old testament, genocide, slavery, rape, incest, that proves the god (if existed) is even worse than the Satan they hate.
 
Arguing religion with atheists? When will evangelicals learn that they can not win that argument?
Since we have circular logic, I think that's a circular question....

As soon as they learn they can't win the argument, they're no longer religious...
 
But it is the presenter that was put forth to give us the information.... This is done for a reason..

If it was just the information in its pure form, that would only require a link to a reputable source... but that's not what's being done as, while they do provide a link, they also add commentary in the hopes that the link won't be followed and people will trust the commentator.

Its a disinformation technique..

The reality is that most people, (greater than 99%) wouldn't understand the information in the link, and this opens the door for someone to hold it up for everyone to see, and then inject their own opinion and commentary as if they are being open, honest, and truthful, and worse yet, pretending like they understand the information...

The nurse in the video probably isn't even capable himself of understanding the information unless he has an advanced degree in medicine, biology, virology, etc... in which case, he wouldn't be a nurse.

Its like a school bus driver giving an Airbus 380 pilot advice on the source of a strange vibration.. And such is the world of bad information we live in today.. where most people are too ignorant to recognize that even the source is flawed, let alone the interpretation... and a conspiracy is born.. an antivaxer is born, an election is stolen, and a host of other wackadoodle stupid things...
So you're a CNN watcher?
 
Since we have circular logic, I think that's a circular question....

As soon as they learn they can't win the argument, they're no longer religious...
Circles have fell upon you and it's probably your faith in your intellect .... And give me horse shoe in response and I'll give you cases
 
I don't know.. all I can tell you is that such subject matter (medicine, nuclear research, rocket science, etc), are not domains that non-experts should partake in and pretend or portray some delusional understanding. Guy's like this dude do more harm than good..

He should stick to what he knows.. and judging by his Ph.D, I would surmise he knows a boat load about nursing and patient care..
But multi billion dollar news stations with professional actors are trustworthy?
 
So you're a CNN watcher?
I haven't watched television for over a decade.

Circles have fell upon you and it's probably your faith in your intellect .... And give me horse shoe in response and I'll give you cases
A donkey is such a simple creature that it will follow a carrot on a stick, but even a donkey knows when there is no carrot.

Nothing has fell upon me, but I do have faith that I'm smarter than the donkey.
 
Just a little tidbit here .... I think it was reported earlier that the FDA is slow walking release of the data they used to certify the Pfizer Covid shot .... they reviewed 329,000 pages of documentation in 108 days, but say it will take 55 years to release the data to the public ..... so far they have released only 91 pages.
I have attached 1 of those pages.
This is adverse events from getting the vaccine.

The swine flu vaccine was discontinued after 25 deaths being reported.

general-overview-of-the-reported-outcomes-to-the-adverse-events.jpg
 
Last edited:
the heart attacks can be directly related to blood clots, for which they have found the cause :

 
Why do you do this to yourself? You've been accused of getting your news from facebook, blogs, and Instagram, and then you decide to regurgitate a tidbit that has been going around for a while. The lack of detail and confusion about facts makes it obvious.

Just a little tidbit here ....
Was that the phrasing used on the facebook post?
I think it was reported earlier that the FDA is slow walking release of the data they used to certify the Pfizer Covid shot ....
If by slow-walking you mean the standard release rate, yes.

they reviewed 329,000 pages of documentation in 108 days, but say it will take 55 years to release the data to the public ..... so far they have released only 91 pages.
I have attached 1 of those pages.
This is adverse events from getting the vaccine.
Are you sure this isn't a list of adverse events that came after vaccination? You do understand the basic concept that correlation is not causation, right? If someone gets hit by a car after they get the vaccine, it doesn't mean the vaccine had magnets in it to suck the car to them.
The swine flu vaccine was discontinued after 25 deaths being reported.
Didn't think it was worth posting the details? That this was the 1976 swine flu, that it was actually discontinued due to ~ 500 cases of GBS out of ~ 80 million vaccinations, and since the flu only killed one person that year they discontinued while they looked into whether GBS was being caused by the vaccine? Who needs details when you have tidbits! Right? Easier to digest and then regurgitate on others.

I'm sure you weren't trying to slip anything by the fine people reading this thread, just willful ignorance and the desire to perpetuate any story that feeds the narrative you have married yourself to.
 


Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart. Not sure if has to do with "heart attacks" but the cdc has some info.

"Reported cases have occurred predominantly in male adolescents and young adults 16 years of age and older. Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose."
 


Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart. Not sure if has to do with "heart attacks" but the cdc has some info.

"Reported cases have occurred predominantly in male adolescents and young adults 16 years of age and older. Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose."
Any idea how many thousands have died because of this ?
 
Any idea how many thousands have died because of this ?
The cdc does state their concern of heart inflammation was in young adults, they state specifically 16 years of age. Again it's always a risk feature and probability. That might be why the cdc mentioned this age group 16+ specifically for consideration (some people may be more at risk heart inflammation) We know the risks, of even death, are extremely low for people of 16 years old, who have tested positive for the virus.
Sacramento, for example, according to cdph, death rate is 0.00004%. This is just out of the 5-17 year old positives to deaths ratio.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top