frankz66
New Member
Hello everyone, it was enough for a day to have results at hand .. I replaced my epever 6415AN with Victron 150/45 smartsolar . List the values I found :
VICTRON smart solar 150/45:
Apparently less powerful in the delivery, the powers delivered are those of greater stability and therefore maintained without showing sudden increases in watts and then go down or remain unstable
No peak regarding battery management or the over voltage of epever.
No exaggerated peak of power in watts, but once dispensed they stay stuck at those values, which seem to give the impressions that something is broken ..
Once the absorption phase is reached, the voltage remains immobile and the current goes down because the battery is now charged.
EPEVER 6415AN tracer:
The regulator activates first in the morning
The powers delivered are always very unstable compared to victron with sudden voltage surges that must be corrected by the software
The battery is often very oscillating in the charging phase or rather it is difficult to maintain it in the range of voltages indicated by software such as bulk and max charge voltage.
If you enter an over volt disconnect value, you need to put it at least 3 volts compared to the standard because the regulator exceeds the parameters indicated.
My conclusions as a beginner are that Victron comes out victorious in terms of charge stability.
Those who make a replacement with victron may have the impression that it is less powerful, but it is not so because the power that this regulator delivers is of a stable type so the results are obtained at the end of the day.
I attach the absorption phase that I wanted to give to 3 hours as the load remains accessible until sunset. As you can see over the 450 watts + inverter 25 watts and almost zero absorption, those few watts are in absorption.
My parameters are:
Bulk 56.80 ( due to continuous loads that I have in the system)
Float 55.80 with 0.40 of reattached .
The margin is low but once the battery is charged it quickly returns to 56.80 v .
Normally I used a maximum of 55.40 v but with victron I preferred 56.80 v as a maximum value below 58.40, so in float with 450 w load I find 0 of battery absorption with a voltage of 55.80 in float.
In my system I repeat the use of the cerichos, which is why the absorption voltages are a bit Latin, but the manufacturer recommends a charge of at least 58.40. I think that with 450 w of loads my voltage is good and generous.
VICTRON smart solar 150/45:
Apparently less powerful in the delivery, the powers delivered are those of greater stability and therefore maintained without showing sudden increases in watts and then go down or remain unstable
No peak regarding battery management or the over voltage of epever.
No exaggerated peak of power in watts, but once dispensed they stay stuck at those values, which seem to give the impressions that something is broken ..
Once the absorption phase is reached, the voltage remains immobile and the current goes down because the battery is now charged.
EPEVER 6415AN tracer:
The regulator activates first in the morning
The powers delivered are always very unstable compared to victron with sudden voltage surges that must be corrected by the software
The battery is often very oscillating in the charging phase or rather it is difficult to maintain it in the range of voltages indicated by software such as bulk and max charge voltage.
If you enter an over volt disconnect value, you need to put it at least 3 volts compared to the standard because the regulator exceeds the parameters indicated.
My conclusions as a beginner are that Victron comes out victorious in terms of charge stability.
Those who make a replacement with victron may have the impression that it is less powerful, but it is not so because the power that this regulator delivers is of a stable type so the results are obtained at the end of the day.
I attach the absorption phase that I wanted to give to 3 hours as the load remains accessible until sunset. As you can see over the 450 watts + inverter 25 watts and almost zero absorption, those few watts are in absorption.
My parameters are:
Bulk 56.80 ( due to continuous loads that I have in the system)
Float 55.80 with 0.40 of reattached .
The margin is low but once the battery is charged it quickly returns to 56.80 v .
Normally I used a maximum of 55.40 v but with victron I preferred 56.80 v as a maximum value below 58.40, so in float with 450 w load I find 0 of battery absorption with a voltage of 55.80 in float.
In my system I repeat the use of the cerichos, which is why the absorption voltages are a bit Latin, but the manufacturer recommends a charge of at least 58.40. I think that with 450 w of loads my voltage is good and generous.
Attachments
Last edited:
