What he meant is: attaching two panels in series with each other to each of two different Solar Controllers (Tracer BNs @ up to 40 amps each) would be roughly the same as wiring those panels pairs "2S" in Parallel before going into ONE controller, a Tracer AN @ up to 80 Amps. The slight advantage for the much-more-costly "dual-BN configuration" would only occur when the pairs are pointed in different directions, and generating power at slightly different voltages when the sunlight is more direct on one pair than the other.
fafrd's two posts are right on the money, except for one thing: Two Tracer BN4215s would cost a bit less than $400, while a single AN8415 costs almost the same amount of money. The AN models have all kinds of messages and threads with problems here at diysolar.com, such as this one:
https://diysolarforum.com/threads/epever-8420an-almost-blew-up-my-batteries.10445/ while the BNs have virtually zero complaints. (My own BN has been totally reliable in accepting tuning parameters and behaving correctly, even though I subject it to sudden PV Voltage changes very frequently.) The all-aluminum cooling fins are another advantage of the 'BN' design.
If the panels will be split as two separate pairs, and the AN controller costs nearly as much money as BOTH BN controllers, why configure with a single point of failure when you can have dual controllers - maybe working even better?