Sun Snatcher
New Member
I bought a pallet (36) of solar panels. 405W Hyperion bi-facial Mono PERC 108 Cells. I would like to deploy some of them soon. I didn't realize this solar business was so damn complex and convoluted.
In my ignorance, I thought if a quarter of a panel was shaded, that it would only reduce the output by a quarter. Lesson quickly learned after watching some videos. Then I learned most people recommend wiring panels in series, keeping the voltage high and the amps low, reducing losses. They also said I wouldn't have to use fuses if the panels are wired in series. Nice. I like that. Less parts, no need to spend extra to buy branch connectors, thinner wires are cheaper, etc.
Series is the way to go, they all said!
However, my solar hopes were dashed yet again, when I learned that when the panels are wired in series, they should all be facing the same direction, and to make matters worse, when in series, when one panel gets shaded, it drags down all the others in the chain.
I did buy a Victron SmartSolar 150/45, which is due to arrive shortly, but I must confess, I don't really know exactly how it all works. With the limited amount of knowledge I have, I thought I could run six panels with this SCC, two strings of 3 in series (37.23V VOC x 3 = 111.69, well under 150V limit), paralleled together. I don't know how this is expressed in shorthand, 3S2P or 3S3P or 3S1P or what.
The amp rating of 45 on the SmartSolar, refers to the maximum amount of amps it will pass along to the battery? It has nothing to do with the amount of amps of input it can handle? The ISC (short circuit current) rating on the panels is 13.87A, which times three is 41.61. Does that mean I cannot run 4 in parallel, because it would exceed 45 amps, but I can run three on this controller? Or does the 45 number in 150/45 have nothing to do with that? Could I have gotten by with a 100/35 if I am only running two strings paralleled together of 3 in series (total six)?
I started looking into perhaps going with one of these popular and relatively cheap 48V AIOs (because most everyone recommends doing 48V rather than 12V), but I am really discouraged by all the reports of how loud and noisy they are, plus their notoriety for high idle or self consumption. I do not live in Las Vegas, where I can easily offset this high idle consumption by simply deploying a couple of extra panels. I live in the cloudy Pac NW, where I need to conserve the little amount of sun that I can seize.
To make matters worse, I do not have a property where I can just line up a lengthy string of panels all facing south. I can line up six on the ground at most, and some of those will sometimes get some shade on them from trees and tree branches, which is particularly noticeable right now when the sun is low in the sky.
I have about five different places I am considering placing panels. A few on the second floor upper deck, perhaps a few more on the patio at the ground level getting eastern sun, a few in a nook of the corner of the house facing south, perhaps (after I attach wheels on the bottom of the panels), wheel a few out in the driveway to face south on sunny days, etc.
The point is, I just can't have one or two nice rows of panels all lined up together, facing the same direction.
The EcoFlows (solar for dummies, like me) seem to have the most attractive feature set, and I also like the styling, and the Delta Pro Ultra and Delta 3 Plus are supposed to be very quiet, and of course portable, which gives them an advantage over the AIOs.
I think they likely have a high idle consumption not unlike the cheap high frequency AIOs, however, I imagine that can be greatly mitigated when the inverter is turned off and not being used, and it is only sucking in solar. If someone can cite some figures for no-load idle consumption on the Delta Pro Ultra taking in solar without the inverter turned on, and also with the inverter on, that would be helpful.
So, if only it were so simple, and I had a nice long roof or backyard where I could line up many panels facing south, and they were mostly unobstructed from the shade, I could simply get a Delta Pro Ultra, with its high 450V PV input, and string 10 of my 405 watt panels in series, for a total of 4000W (the DPU's limit on the high input). I could put a couple more in parallel on the low PV input for a total of 12 solar panels.
However, with some panels on the upper deck in the back (east), a few on the ground below in the tiny area of the backyard (east), a handful in the corner nook of the house where by the shed facing south, and the the long portion of the house facing south (can fit six across vertically), a few in the driveway, it doesn't seem feasible to this solar newb to simply string them all in series to one EcoFlow Delta Pro Ultra, as much as I would like to.
Furthermore, the main panel in the house is almost 60 years old, and badly needs to be replaced and upgraded to 200A, and there is no available room (circuits) to install a 30A or 50A generator inlet box. So the 240V output on the DPU would only be useful in the future, when I can find a way to upgrade the main panel for a decent price.
So, the Delta Pro Ultra can be had for around $4000 OTD, and the Delta 3 Plus for $541 OTD, so I could buy almost 7 and a half of the D3+ units for the same price as one DPU. The inverter on the DPU is 7200W, and 1800W on the D3+, so four Delta 3 Plus units would give me 7200W of inverter power, or 12,600W if I bought seven. I realize they cannot be paralleled together, so it is not the same as having one big inverter, but 1800W is enough to cover any 120V outlet and most all of my appliances.
The only 240V loads are the electric range/cooktop, and the electric dryer, which is used very sparingly. We do not even use the big 240V oven as much as we used to, because we use out fairly large 120V air fryer (big enough to fit a pizza), because it is just easier. Although we do use the electric infrared cooktop on the range regularly, if not daily. We do not have a well pump or any AC unit that needs a large inverter to run it, because we live in the Pac NW, where it is mostly cooler, where we rarely need AC. If we need the comfort of AC, we can just run a small portable or window unit off of 120V.
We average around 16 kwh electricity usage per day, far below the national average. Our biggest draws of juice are our two fridges and a large freezer (a little less than 6k per day, and periodically running the fan on the gas furnace (when running, draws 370 watts). The past two days have been a bit cold, and we used about 6.7 k to run the furnace, or avg. of about 3.35k per day. The big TV and AVR is on for about 5-6 hours in the evening.
I am not looking to go completely off-grid, but simply want to have an elegant backup solution available for extended power outages, like the one we just experienced this past November, when we were without power for 5 straight days. I don't see the value or frugality in buying a portable power station and some batteries and letting them sit there doing nothing for years on end, waiting for a power outage to come along, so it seems prudent to put these power stations and solar panels to use year round, with the goal of lowering monthly electricity costs, with the benefit of having some juice available when the grid is down.
The Delta 3 Plus has two solar inputs of 500W each (11-60V 15A), so it is seems to me that I could hook up two of these large 405 W panels, one in each input, for a maximum of 810W. Times seven, that is a total of 14 panels total I could hook up to the Delta 3 Plusses, wherever I want to lay them out or install them in different configurations.
I am admittedly ignorant about all of this, but it seems to me that the benefit of going the route of using seven D3+ units, is that each of the fourteen solar panels I could potentially plug into the seven D3+s, would have its own dedicated input, and would therefore not deleteriously impact any of the other panels if it was shaded or removed. I can anticipate wanting to sometimes temporarily remove panels, moving them around to different spots, repositioning them or even reconfiguring them.
For example, I have entertained the possibility of installing three panels flat on the 2 x 6 railings of the back deck (very easy to screw down a couple corner of the solar panel onto the wide railing) during the winter months, when more solar is needed, but when the lady of the house wants to do some deck gardening in the spring/summer, I could easily remove the panels, freeing up space to place her vegetables/herbs on that portion of the deck to grow them. It's complicated, but that is the challenge which I have to work with. Some gaps in the trees where the sun can shine unobstructed for a while, some branches from the neighbors trees which will throw a bit of partial shade on panels when the sun hits a certain spot in the sky, etc.
So, what do folks think? Is it feasible or realistic to run up to seven D3+ units, with two 405 W solar panels plugged into each unit, mitigating the shortcomings of running panels in series along with the ill effects of shading, and also not having to worry about fusing parallel runs? Of course I would need many runs of MC4 cables, fourteen in total to use 14 panels. Some of these runs would be reasonably short, and a few would be longer, so I would have to pay a bit for the cables.
There are benefits and downsides, of course. The DPU has the benefit of having 240V in and out, which I could certainly take advantage of in the future, and I would not get this with the smaller D3Plus.
However, one benefit is the redundancy factor. If one DPU goes kaput, my solar set up would be out of commission while the problem was being rectified. If one D3+ unit went bad, I could still use the other six, while the seventh was being repaired or replaced.
The plan would be to have multiple D3+ units strategically located in different parts of the house, near where the loads from the inverter will need to be run. One or two in the garage, to run the spare fridge and freezer, another nearby the furnace, which has already been rewired so it can be unplugged, and run off a generator or power station (I ran the furnace during the bomb cyclone with a generator to keep the house warm), one near the living room (since they are said to be quiet) to run the TV, AVR and router, plug-in and charge my laptop while I watch TV, one or two in the kitchen to run the fridge, air fryer, microwave, coffee maker, blender, mixer, griddle, etc.).
You get the idea. I might have to move or shuffle a few units around, and charge them during the day with solar, only to carry them off to use them somewhere else, but that is not a disadvantage, but actually an advantage. The D3+ is around 27 pounds, the perfect weight to sling around and force me to get some exercise moving them from the downstairs/garage to the upstairs. I don't get enough exercise and wheeling out some 49 pound solar panels and moving around some power stations would be a fun way to force me to get some more exercise.
I just came up with this idea off the top of my head, and probably haven't thought it through thoroughly, so I am prepared to have my solar dreams dashed, and have someone tell me why this is not feasible or practical.
Seven Delta 3 Plus units are slightly cheaper ($3787) for me than one Delta Pro Ultra ($4000), and I would have 7.1 kwh battery capacity vs. 6.1 kwh with the Ultra, and a total of 12,600 watts of inverter power (yes, I realize all separated). I would have access to USB ports wherever I placed a D3+ to run my devices and charge my phone(s), where I wouldn't have that with the Pro Ultra.
If at some point in the future I invested in a new main panel, with a generator inlet box and interlock to run the whole house, and wanted something more elegant and convenient such as the DPU for whole home backup, I could envision giving a few of these smaller units away as gifts to family, or sell them off.
Of course, I wouldn't have to purchase seven exactly, or all seven at once. With just a few, I could cut our electricity usage down quite a bit just by powering off-grid nearly 6 kwh from the two full size fridges and freezer every day, and shave 2 or 3 kwh of electricity from the furnace during the colder half of the year, when the fan runs more frequently.
If I could generate any excess solar during the summer, I would add some portable or window AC for those handful of days when it gets up into the 90s-100. I am even considering getting the EcoFlow Wave 2 portable heat pump, which would cool our smaller rooms down a bit.
Of course, I would add some cheap 48V battery storage to capture and store as much sun as possible, and when the sun goes down and I am not taking in any more solar, I could simply unplug the solar from one or both of the XT60i inputs from a few of the units and plug in a 48V battery to charge up the Delta 3 Plus enough to get it to last through the night, running the loads.
Is this totally crazy, or does it sound like something that is a bit of a challenge, but feasible? Go ahead and make fun of me, I have only been researching all this solar business for a month or so. It will take a while to get up to speed and come up with the most cost-effective and convenient solution, which is also kind of fun as well as a learning process.
In my ignorance, I thought if a quarter of a panel was shaded, that it would only reduce the output by a quarter. Lesson quickly learned after watching some videos. Then I learned most people recommend wiring panels in series, keeping the voltage high and the amps low, reducing losses. They also said I wouldn't have to use fuses if the panels are wired in series. Nice. I like that. Less parts, no need to spend extra to buy branch connectors, thinner wires are cheaper, etc.
Series is the way to go, they all said!
However, my solar hopes were dashed yet again, when I learned that when the panels are wired in series, they should all be facing the same direction, and to make matters worse, when in series, when one panel gets shaded, it drags down all the others in the chain.
I did buy a Victron SmartSolar 150/45, which is due to arrive shortly, but I must confess, I don't really know exactly how it all works. With the limited amount of knowledge I have, I thought I could run six panels with this SCC, two strings of 3 in series (37.23V VOC x 3 = 111.69, well under 150V limit), paralleled together. I don't know how this is expressed in shorthand, 3S2P or 3S3P or 3S1P or what.
The amp rating of 45 on the SmartSolar, refers to the maximum amount of amps it will pass along to the battery? It has nothing to do with the amount of amps of input it can handle? The ISC (short circuit current) rating on the panels is 13.87A, which times three is 41.61. Does that mean I cannot run 4 in parallel, because it would exceed 45 amps, but I can run three on this controller? Or does the 45 number in 150/45 have nothing to do with that? Could I have gotten by with a 100/35 if I am only running two strings paralleled together of 3 in series (total six)?
I started looking into perhaps going with one of these popular and relatively cheap 48V AIOs (because most everyone recommends doing 48V rather than 12V), but I am really discouraged by all the reports of how loud and noisy they are, plus their notoriety for high idle or self consumption. I do not live in Las Vegas, where I can easily offset this high idle consumption by simply deploying a couple of extra panels. I live in the cloudy Pac NW, where I need to conserve the little amount of sun that I can seize.
To make matters worse, I do not have a property where I can just line up a lengthy string of panels all facing south. I can line up six on the ground at most, and some of those will sometimes get some shade on them from trees and tree branches, which is particularly noticeable right now when the sun is low in the sky.
I have about five different places I am considering placing panels. A few on the second floor upper deck, perhaps a few more on the patio at the ground level getting eastern sun, a few in a nook of the corner of the house facing south, perhaps (after I attach wheels on the bottom of the panels), wheel a few out in the driveway to face south on sunny days, etc.
The point is, I just can't have one or two nice rows of panels all lined up together, facing the same direction.
The EcoFlows (solar for dummies, like me) seem to have the most attractive feature set, and I also like the styling, and the Delta Pro Ultra and Delta 3 Plus are supposed to be very quiet, and of course portable, which gives them an advantage over the AIOs.
I think they likely have a high idle consumption not unlike the cheap high frequency AIOs, however, I imagine that can be greatly mitigated when the inverter is turned off and not being used, and it is only sucking in solar. If someone can cite some figures for no-load idle consumption on the Delta Pro Ultra taking in solar without the inverter turned on, and also with the inverter on, that would be helpful.
So, if only it were so simple, and I had a nice long roof or backyard where I could line up many panels facing south, and they were mostly unobstructed from the shade, I could simply get a Delta Pro Ultra, with its high 450V PV input, and string 10 of my 405 watt panels in series, for a total of 4000W (the DPU's limit on the high input). I could put a couple more in parallel on the low PV input for a total of 12 solar panels.
However, with some panels on the upper deck in the back (east), a few on the ground below in the tiny area of the backyard (east), a handful in the corner nook of the house where by the shed facing south, and the the long portion of the house facing south (can fit six across vertically), a few in the driveway, it doesn't seem feasible to this solar newb to simply string them all in series to one EcoFlow Delta Pro Ultra, as much as I would like to.
Furthermore, the main panel in the house is almost 60 years old, and badly needs to be replaced and upgraded to 200A, and there is no available room (circuits) to install a 30A or 50A generator inlet box. So the 240V output on the DPU would only be useful in the future, when I can find a way to upgrade the main panel for a decent price.
So, the Delta Pro Ultra can be had for around $4000 OTD, and the Delta 3 Plus for $541 OTD, so I could buy almost 7 and a half of the D3+ units for the same price as one DPU. The inverter on the DPU is 7200W, and 1800W on the D3+, so four Delta 3 Plus units would give me 7200W of inverter power, or 12,600W if I bought seven. I realize they cannot be paralleled together, so it is not the same as having one big inverter, but 1800W is enough to cover any 120V outlet and most all of my appliances.
The only 240V loads are the electric range/cooktop, and the electric dryer, which is used very sparingly. We do not even use the big 240V oven as much as we used to, because we use out fairly large 120V air fryer (big enough to fit a pizza), because it is just easier. Although we do use the electric infrared cooktop on the range regularly, if not daily. We do not have a well pump or any AC unit that needs a large inverter to run it, because we live in the Pac NW, where it is mostly cooler, where we rarely need AC. If we need the comfort of AC, we can just run a small portable or window unit off of 120V.
We average around 16 kwh electricity usage per day, far below the national average. Our biggest draws of juice are our two fridges and a large freezer (a little less than 6k per day, and periodically running the fan on the gas furnace (when running, draws 370 watts). The past two days have been a bit cold, and we used about 6.7 k to run the furnace, or avg. of about 3.35k per day. The big TV and AVR is on for about 5-6 hours in the evening.
I am not looking to go completely off-grid, but simply want to have an elegant backup solution available for extended power outages, like the one we just experienced this past November, when we were without power for 5 straight days. I don't see the value or frugality in buying a portable power station and some batteries and letting them sit there doing nothing for years on end, waiting for a power outage to come along, so it seems prudent to put these power stations and solar panels to use year round, with the goal of lowering monthly electricity costs, with the benefit of having some juice available when the grid is down.
The Delta 3 Plus has two solar inputs of 500W each (11-60V 15A), so it is seems to me that I could hook up two of these large 405 W panels, one in each input, for a maximum of 810W. Times seven, that is a total of 14 panels total I could hook up to the Delta 3 Plusses, wherever I want to lay them out or install them in different configurations.
I am admittedly ignorant about all of this, but it seems to me that the benefit of going the route of using seven D3+ units, is that each of the fourteen solar panels I could potentially plug into the seven D3+s, would have its own dedicated input, and would therefore not deleteriously impact any of the other panels if it was shaded or removed. I can anticipate wanting to sometimes temporarily remove panels, moving them around to different spots, repositioning them or even reconfiguring them.
For example, I have entertained the possibility of installing three panels flat on the 2 x 6 railings of the back deck (very easy to screw down a couple corner of the solar panel onto the wide railing) during the winter months, when more solar is needed, but when the lady of the house wants to do some deck gardening in the spring/summer, I could easily remove the panels, freeing up space to place her vegetables/herbs on that portion of the deck to grow them. It's complicated, but that is the challenge which I have to work with. Some gaps in the trees where the sun can shine unobstructed for a while, some branches from the neighbors trees which will throw a bit of partial shade on panels when the sun hits a certain spot in the sky, etc.
So, what do folks think? Is it feasible or realistic to run up to seven D3+ units, with two 405 W solar panels plugged into each unit, mitigating the shortcomings of running panels in series along with the ill effects of shading, and also not having to worry about fusing parallel runs? Of course I would need many runs of MC4 cables, fourteen in total to use 14 panels. Some of these runs would be reasonably short, and a few would be longer, so I would have to pay a bit for the cables.
There are benefits and downsides, of course. The DPU has the benefit of having 240V in and out, which I could certainly take advantage of in the future, and I would not get this with the smaller D3Plus.
However, one benefit is the redundancy factor. If one DPU goes kaput, my solar set up would be out of commission while the problem was being rectified. If one D3+ unit went bad, I could still use the other six, while the seventh was being repaired or replaced.
The plan would be to have multiple D3+ units strategically located in different parts of the house, near where the loads from the inverter will need to be run. One or two in the garage, to run the spare fridge and freezer, another nearby the furnace, which has already been rewired so it can be unplugged, and run off a generator or power station (I ran the furnace during the bomb cyclone with a generator to keep the house warm), one near the living room (since they are said to be quiet) to run the TV, AVR and router, plug-in and charge my laptop while I watch TV, one or two in the kitchen to run the fridge, air fryer, microwave, coffee maker, blender, mixer, griddle, etc.).
You get the idea. I might have to move or shuffle a few units around, and charge them during the day with solar, only to carry them off to use them somewhere else, but that is not a disadvantage, but actually an advantage. The D3+ is around 27 pounds, the perfect weight to sling around and force me to get some exercise moving them from the downstairs/garage to the upstairs. I don't get enough exercise and wheeling out some 49 pound solar panels and moving around some power stations would be a fun way to force me to get some more exercise.
I just came up with this idea off the top of my head, and probably haven't thought it through thoroughly, so I am prepared to have my solar dreams dashed, and have someone tell me why this is not feasible or practical.
Seven Delta 3 Plus units are slightly cheaper ($3787) for me than one Delta Pro Ultra ($4000), and I would have 7.1 kwh battery capacity vs. 6.1 kwh with the Ultra, and a total of 12,600 watts of inverter power (yes, I realize all separated). I would have access to USB ports wherever I placed a D3+ to run my devices and charge my phone(s), where I wouldn't have that with the Pro Ultra.
If at some point in the future I invested in a new main panel, with a generator inlet box and interlock to run the whole house, and wanted something more elegant and convenient such as the DPU for whole home backup, I could envision giving a few of these smaller units away as gifts to family, or sell them off.
Of course, I wouldn't have to purchase seven exactly, or all seven at once. With just a few, I could cut our electricity usage down quite a bit just by powering off-grid nearly 6 kwh from the two full size fridges and freezer every day, and shave 2 or 3 kwh of electricity from the furnace during the colder half of the year, when the fan runs more frequently.
If I could generate any excess solar during the summer, I would add some portable or window AC for those handful of days when it gets up into the 90s-100. I am even considering getting the EcoFlow Wave 2 portable heat pump, which would cool our smaller rooms down a bit.
Of course, I would add some cheap 48V battery storage to capture and store as much sun as possible, and when the sun goes down and I am not taking in any more solar, I could simply unplug the solar from one or both of the XT60i inputs from a few of the units and plug in a 48V battery to charge up the Delta 3 Plus enough to get it to last through the night, running the loads.
Is this totally crazy, or does it sound like something that is a bit of a challenge, but feasible? Go ahead and make fun of me, I have only been researching all this solar business for a month or so. It will take a while to get up to speed and come up with the most cost-effective and convenient solution, which is also kind of fun as well as a learning process.