au6768
New Member
Hi Everyone,
I am looking at a 6000XP to use for emergency backup situations. The plan is to have:
Based on the design, I believe I have a double ground/neutral bond (parallel loop) caused by the subpanel being tied into the main panel through the 2 pole switch.
I have seen in other designs where the main panel to the switch only has the 2 hot wires. In this case, the ground and neutral is getting to the sub panel through the inverter chain. In other cases, I have seen the neutral and ground from the inverter not be used (or capped in the switch) and instead to have the subpanel receive neutral and ground from the main panel.
What is the preference and appropriate way to do this? To me it would seem better for the subpanel to receive ground and neutral from the main panel. This in case the inverter is ever taken out of the chain.
Or would it be better to use a 3 pole switch (which could get pricey).
Thanks in advance for the help!

I am looking at a 6000XP to use for emergency backup situations. The plan is to have:
- 200 amp main panel, where the ground/neutral bond is, feed a 50-70 amp circuit which will be connected to the 6000XP AC In
- Ground and neutral will be run from main panel to the inverter. No bond within the inverter (which I understand is the default in the 6000xp software)
- AC output of the 6000XP to feed a 2 pole double throw switch
- Main panel to have a separate 50-70 amp circuit which feeds the other input of the switch
- Output of the switch to feed a 50-70 amp sub panel / critical loads
- Ground and neutral will not be bonded in sub panel
- 6000XP to have 15kwh of batteries and backup through a 30 amp inverter generator
Based on the design, I believe I have a double ground/neutral bond (parallel loop) caused by the subpanel being tied into the main panel through the 2 pole switch.
I have seen in other designs where the main panel to the switch only has the 2 hot wires. In this case, the ground and neutral is getting to the sub panel through the inverter chain. In other cases, I have seen the neutral and ground from the inverter not be used (or capped in the switch) and instead to have the subpanel receive neutral and ground from the main panel.
What is the preference and appropriate way to do this? To me it would seem better for the subpanel to receive ground and neutral from the main panel. This in case the inverter is ever taken out of the chain.
Or would it be better to use a 3 pole switch (which could get pricey).
Thanks in advance for the help!
