• Have you tried out dark mode?! Scroll to the bottom of any page to find a sun or moon icon to turn dark mode on or off!

diy solar

diy solar

Solar Assistant Updates - Beta

I may have to revise my stance about solar assistant.
I did a one time purchase of 50 USD for this software as it included life time updates AND transferability to new devices, as there were open source tools available, but I wanted to support the developer for his work.
Now it seems, he is trying to milk the cow further under false pretenses of supporting the development and hardware transferability.


This opt-out basically breaks that contract , as it will allow updates, but breaks transferability, which goes against the EU directive for software licensing terms and upgrades :
Also it is an explicit breach of contract, both of which I plan to report..
Essentially, if the raspi breaks or my SSD/MMC card corrupts , I will be forced not only to repurchase, but also go along with their bi-yearly subscription model for updates

I send an email asking for an explanation to SA, and this is the response I got, further underlining their breach of contract

"
Hi xxxxx

Thanks for taking the time to reach out. Apologies for any concern caused by this. We do understand the frustration, but we have been trying our best to find a consumer-friendly model that will allow us to run sustainably.

First, as shown here, please know that this has no bearing on the operation of the unit. Your perpetual license will always be active, and we will never revoke your ability to use the software. This means you can continue to use the software in perpetuity without having to pay a single cent beyond the initial purchase. So it is not a subscription model; there are no monthly or yearly fees for using SolarAssistant. It is more of a "pay-for-features" model, or pay per development situation.

What we have done is give each license purchased 2 years' worth of free updates. This means that for 2 years after purchasing the license, you will be able to update the device with new features we develop during that time. Once that period elapses, you will be given 2 options. You can either pay for another year or two's worth of updates, as shown here, or leave the device on the version you have until you feel we have added enough to justify the purchase of further updates. So you can not purchase an update package for 10 years, then purchase a year's worth of update extension and get all the updates released during that time.

Please note that if you purchased your license before August 2024 and feel like this model change is not what you were hoping for, we would highly recommend reading the final section on this page. As mentioned in that article, you can stick to our original terms of service, but we would recommend understanding said terms before doing so.

We do hope this offers some clarification on the matter, and thank you for your understanding. Please let us know if you need any further assistance, and have a great week.


Kind regards,"


For now , I will no longer advise sa , as it seems they have gotten the idea that no alternatives are available in their software space, and they are misusing the trust and recommendations the community have given for purchasing this ( mainly bunched together open source) software
 
I may have to revise my stance about solar assistant.
I did a one time purchase of 50 USD for this software as it included life time updates AND transferability to new devices, as there were open source tools available, but I wanted to support the developer for his work.
I only purchased recently but my understanding is the original licensing always only allowed for one additional activation in case the original pi hardware died. That's what the new licensing scheme allows. Unlimited moves so you can upgrade your hardware without being locked in. You choose which option you'd like
 
I only purchased recently but my understanding is the original licensing always only allowed for one additional activation in case the original pi hardware died. That's what the new licensing scheme allows. Unlimited moves so you can upgrade your hardware without being locked in. You choose which option you'd like
Except if you read the response, you'll find that the new licensing scheme also only provides updates for 2 years, after which you will have repurchase if you want updates.
That is not what I agreed to when I bought , thus a breach of contract

Just to clarify : my order number is well under 1000, and my purchase was in 2020, and beta tester too

So I feel getting stiffed here
 
Except if you read the response, you'll find that the new licensing scheme also only provides updates for 2 years, after which you will have repurchase if you want updates.
That is not what I agreed to when I bought , thus a breach of contract

Just to clarify : my order number is well under 1000, and my purchase was in 2020, and beta tester too

So I feel getting stiffed here
Right. So you would opt out of new licensing and stay on a single device with perpetual free updates.

Just like Crowz was able to do.

I don't see the breach of contract?

Screenshot_20250815_075722_Chrome.jpg
 
Right. So you would opt out of new licensing and stay on a single device with perpetual free updates.

Just like Crowz was able to do.

I don't see the breach of contract?

View attachment 321438
If you do this, and your device breaks, I can no longer transfer this to a new device without repurchase and being forced into their new model forcing me to purchase bij yearly

If I don't, I no longer get updates

That is not the contract ( order) I agreed too
 
If you do this, and your device breaks, I can no longer transfer this to a new device without repurchase and being forced into their new model forcing me to purchase bij yearly

If I don't, I no longer get updates

That is not the contract ( order) I agreed too
In previous licensing that was still the case, if your pi fails and you use your single transfer and your second pi fails your are shit out of luck. That would still be the case.

It was obvious from the original license that that was a possible weak point and absolutely "locked you in" to a specific hardware unit.

Are you saying that if you opt-out, and your second pi fails and you then have to buy a new license, that licensing won't be grandfathered in for perpetual updates, and that's the breach of contract?
 
So, in my experience with software that locks to a specific piece of hardware developers usually take the easy way out and have it use the MAC address of the first on board ethernet port. They can get more specific and snapshot other hardware specs, but are usually lazy and with non-single board computers different bits can be upgraded which would require license generation.

Has anyone tried updating that when transferring the software to new hardware? I am just curious if the developers were lazy or not
 
This post originally noted my confusion with reading here about a limit of one device transfer, but seeing SA offered with a “perpetual” license for those that purchased after Aug 2024 (and finding that in their website even today, Aug 2025). After reading through their site again this evening, I see that I had no reason to be upset. The license they offer IS a perpetual license! What they changed was the ability to UPGRADE without paying an additional fee, after two years from the date of purchase. There is no limit on continued use of the original (or upgraded within two years of purchase ) software, on as many replacement devices as you need, so long as that license is in use for only one device at a time. And if you don’t like that deal and purchased before Aug 2024, they allow you to opt out of the new (post 8/2024) terms.

THAT’S VERY FAIR. I stand corrected, and have replaced my original post with this one. If you liked that post and want to unlike it, feel free, of course. Personally, I stand corrected, and am impressed.
 
Last edited:
Glad to see dark mode and some other changes, but I really don't use SA directly anymore I use it as a bridge to Home Assistant where I can make any dashboard or calculated sensors I want along with integrating other things in the house and even get push notification in the phone app for events like grid down.

I don't mind paying for software and SA works great plus they had premade cables as well so it was really easy to get things up and running, but not sure its worth moving over to subscription model for what it provides since I am not using the UI directly.

I think I will probably just move over to a ESPHome solution this should get me more data anyway since SA does not publish all the data such as cell temperature from my Pytes. Its will just be some work to get the ESP32 devices setup, but will be in the end simpler and cheaper hardware than a full RaspPi:


 
Last edited:
Right. So you would opt out of new licensing and stay on a single device with perpetual free updates.

What still has me confused is the part that says:

"However, we recommend considering the new model to support ongoing development and access to future related services that wasn't bundled in the original product"

What exactly is a "future related service"? Sounds like if they add a feature, they can claim it's a related service that wasn't part of the original product. Thus your free updates may end whenever that "new service" is added.
 
What still has me confused is the part that says:

"However, we recommend considering the new model to support ongoing development and access to future related services that wasn't bundled in the original product"

What exactly is a "future related service"? Sounds like if they add a feature, they can claim it's a related service that wasn't part of the original product. Thus your free updates may end whenever that "new service" is added.
Basically stop reading after it says "however, we recommend....." at that point its turned into marketing and hopes and prayers.
 
Well, color me confused...

I just (Aug 15, 2025) looked at the SA site, for the software only option, and it clearly says, in bold text,

"Perpetual usage of SolarAssistant without monthly fees"

I then looked up the Merriam-Webster definition of "perpetual", just to be sure my aging mind was still working, and it says, "continuing forever". So, at least my mind had that right.

So, what's all this about additional/ongoing fees? Or "only as long as your device lasts" (with no mention of that on the page where they highlight "perpetual")? Perpetual is perpetual, period. I really like my SA setup and have absolutely no complaints except that it sometimes must be restarted if we lose internet access, and that's minor. But I don't think it's right for me to be forced to buy another license if I just swap out to another RPi and don't want or need more features. Perpetual is perpetual. What am I missing?
I think you've failed to read the original license that specifies one license transfer in case of hardware failure.
 
I think you've failed to read the original license that specifies one license transfer in case of hardware failure.
@Brucey I’m editing my earlier reply here to you. Please see my corrected (changed) post #35. I don’t have the original license text, and the change they made seems fair to me. They DO offer a truly perpetual license now. Only upgrades have a limitation.
 
Last edited:
I am having issues with SA losing connection with my inverters for brief periods, I have replaced the wires. It may be a pi problem I dont know.

What I want is the ability to have extra new PI hardware as a hot backup and for troubleshooting, with my account and mqtt information on a spare sd card. plug it in and have it work

So if I am not here my wife could unplug all wires from the pi and get a new one off the shelf replug the wires and have it work.

I am willing to pay a license fee if this is possible

I use the automations to switch back and forth between sbu and utility first for free night electric, inverters are in a outbuilding and manually changing settings is not very doable

I like Solar Assistant but the lock in with PIs has me wishing for an alternative windows/pc solution
 
Economic conditions change. His alternative is to go out of business. How is that going to help you?
Bullshit, his alternative is to stick to the deals he made when he needed business, not to start milking it when he has the user base that helped to get where he is...

If I buy a whole bread, I expect to eat it..
Not while half way done get presented with additional fees to keep eating.

If there was let's say a new serie ( e.g
solar assistant reloaded) which contained a million new a use full features i would be more than willing to pay once, but I absolutely resend any form of subscription based licensing, as this model is nothing more than a milk cow.
 
Bullshit, his alternative is to stick to the deals he made when he needed business, not to start milking it when he has the user base that helped to get where he is...

If I buy a whole bread, I expect to eat it..
Not while half way done get presented with additional fees to keep eating.

If there was let's say a new serie ( e.g
solar assistant reloaded) which contained a million new a use full features i would be more than willing to pay once, but I absolutely resend any form of subscription based licensing, as this model is nothing more than a milk cow.
Well good luck maintaining it yourself.
 
Well good luck maintaining it yourself.
Don't need to, plenty of alternatives..
But
Again, a contract is a contract, perpetual is perpetual.
Just piss me well off that every time someone develops or rather puts a bunch of existing open source projects together in a usable and good package, gathers Community Support, gets loads of sales through that community, then decided to plainly screw over that same community
 
Did you buy before August 2024?

I don't understand exactly where this date has been back-editted into agreements.

There was no such subscription/payment model when I got SA back around March 2025. It was a one off payment, perpetual licence. No mention of paying again to get the "free" updates.

This is was all a new thing (see the original thread on here) when it "accidentally by mistake" got added to a Beta, around June. Somehow, this has become back-dated to August last year. What?

"Paging Louis Rossmann ... " (it won't end well ....) :(
 
I don't understand exactly where this date has been back-editted into agreements.

There was no such subscription/payment model when I got SA back around March 2025. It was a one off payment, perpetual licence. No mention of paying again to get the "free" updates.

This is was all a new thing (see the original thread on here) when it "accidentally by mistake" got added to a Beta, around June. Somehow, this has become back-dated to August last year. What?

"Paging Louis Rossmann ... " (it won't end well ....) :(
The wording of the new model has been on their page since August 2024.
 

diy solar

diy solar
Back
Top