Sodium ion batteries are less efficient (round trip efficiency is 60 to 85%. Lithium ion is 90 to 97%), hold less energy for its volume and have shorter life cycle count.
Which makes them pretty bad for solar systems. Still not sure why people mention them.
If the tech gets better one day then I can't wait to test them. But I haven't seen a single compelling one at any of the conferences.
Thanks for the reply Will.
I guess the round trip efficiency issue was my original question:
Do the an "all in one" sodium ion batteries (with built in charge controller and inverter) have sodium specific inverters to accommodate the wider voltage range of the sodium chemistry?
If a sodium specific inverter (with a higher high voltage disconnect and a lower low voltage disconnect) is used then the round trip efficiency improves considerably as more of the battery voltage is accessible and usable.
If a generic inverter is used then less of the sodium battery's voltage will be accessible and round trip efficiency reduces.
The attraction for me is a more stable chemistry at temperature extremes. And to a lesser extent the removal of that lingering concern over lithium's reputation to self combust.
Claimed life cycles seems to be comparable to lithium and space isn't a concern for me.
Is there a place for sodium?
I think so if some of the hardware issues are addressed
Lithium battery tear downs and comparative tests have been done to death
Is it time to have a look at some of the sodium "all in one" batteries which should be using sodium specific hardware inside their housings?
Just a thought, Will, and I'm sure I'm not the only one that is thinking this way.
I know this is a long post but would love to hear your thoughts.
This Off Grid Garage test shows the importance of inverter voltage disconnect settings for extracting available power from sodium battery: