didn’t expect to see *holofractal* show up!

visualizing nature’s behavior is fun!

Thanks for the keyword; very interesting.

r/holofractal: The holofractographic unified field theory, as developed by Nassim Haramein and physicists at the Resonance Science Foundation & …

www.reddit.com

After only a very brief look, the main distinction I would say is rooted in the debate about

*mathematical realism*. In a nutshell, is mathematics simply a human invention to describe nature? Is mathematics something we (humans) create as a model of the real world or is it something more fundamental? The counterargument is that the real world follows mathematics which leads to the term

*mathematical realism*.

In the present case, the interpretation of the reality of the

*Poynting Vector* as energy flux seems to lie squarely on the same question. Is it a real quantity or just a mathematical abstraction like imaginary numbers or potential energy that we don't see?

As per the holofractal theories, there are patterns in nature that are throughout. We can liken these to

*a priori* properties that CAN NOT be derived but always exist. The fundamental argument I put forth is that it is well accepted that mathematics is

*a priori *and so it is discovered NOT invented, and the physical laws of nature are as well

*a priori* no human-invented them. So are we to believe that there is no intersection between mathematics and the physical world? How can two

*a priori* property sets not be related? Well, they would have to be

*independent* but that is clearly not the case for independence means that we can not derive one from the other which is especially confounding except in the circular logic of

*modal collapse*. So when we "

*work out the math*", and we find some serendipitous relation between the math and the physical process it is because to a certain extent they are one and the same. Formally I would say that mathematics/logic is an inner model of the

*a priori* physical world.

The way that the Poynting math always points in the direction of energy flow, is the exact pattern in the propositional calculus for A<->B which is inseparable from and in fact defined by A->B and B-> A which is pure formal logic (propositional calculus) and the basis for the formal proof theory. This relation is called

*material equivalence* and at its core is the circular reference that establishes what we call

*truth*. For example in A<->B , this relation is true is A=B =True or A=B=False and is False in all other cases. If you have a longer chain of circular references A->B and B->C and .... etc Z->A the same is always true.

The physical interpretation then is that Truth implies Energy Flow independent of the direction of the E&M flows. I'm suggesting that it can't be any other way (due to the math/logic) and the Poynting vector is very real just as the E&M fields are.