Bob B
Emperor Of Solar
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
- Messages
- 9,801
This is absolutely true ..... If the Supreme Court fails to stop it we are in deep shit.
The MAM’s role, on the other hand, is more subtle, and its objectives are slightly different. The MAM acknowledges concepts such as the uniparty and the deep state. But it then steers the conversation toward advocating some sort of party political solution—usually in the form of one political saviour or another. The MAM’s goal here is to return those who have wandered away from the Overton Window back to a degree of hope that the state can be reformed as long as they continue to engage in the muck of party politics.
The MAM’s other task is to openly discuss suppressed information and thereby gain the trust of those who no longer trust the corporate legacy media. Once that trust is secured, the MAM then reinterprets the previously suppressed information to suggest solutions or narratives that are amenable to the oligarchs but are actually anathema to their audience. In doing so, the MAM averts the possibility of the disillusioned taking any action against the oligarch’s interests by holding them in a state of confusion and apathy.
Here’s a concrete example. American MAM reporters have openly admitted that global governance overreach is a problem. These kinds of admissions are not within the remit of the corporate legacy media. The MAM then advocated the ideas of billionaires like Peter Thiel—a Bilderberg steering committee oligarch and prominent supporter of the Trump administration—as a hopeful solution to globalist overreach. But Thiel is offering gov-corp Technates as a path forward. These Technates are the most extreme form of Technocracy—which is the social control mechanism favoured by globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum.
Thus, the American MAM has acknowledged Republican voters’ wish to escape globalist control but has steered them to blindly accept gov-corp Technates. Encouraged to vote for Trump, what freedom-minded Republican voters have ended up with is perhaps the most authoritarian form of globalist oligarch control imaginable. At the same time, many ordinary Americans evidently believe they have struck a blow against global governance overreach by electing Trump.
That said, we should also note that election results seem to be so heavily manipulated that the degree to which they actually reflect the “will of the people” is highly dubious. Not that it matters much, because government is “fake” anyway.
It doesn’t really matter which major policy arena we look at. Whether it’s the policy response to climate change or to the energy crisis or to spiralling global debt or to wartime sanctions—or even to war itself—the outcome is always the same. Not sometimes the same. Not occasionally the same. But consistently the same. Oligarchs always amass more wealth, influence, and resultant power via government policy decisions. And usually those decisions are made amidst crises.
The deep state mechanisms for controlling political authority (Biased Pluralism) include lobbying, the whip system, and political party funding. Simultaneously, the outcomes from using these mechanisms benefit oligarchs above all others. The benefit to them is unshakably uniform.
Consider the US presidential and congressional elections last November. Americans voted for what they thought was candidate Trump’s technopopulist policy platform. His followers had high hopes of freeing themselves from what they sensed was the overreach of globalist institutions like the WHO and the IPCC. In exchange for supporting years of debate, enduring months of campaigning, answering pleas for donations, and, ultimately, filling in their ballots, Republican voters got for their efforts an intelligence-linked oligarchy whose leading voices want to do away with representative democracy and install a privatised state we can call a gov-corp Technate (a concept discussed in a different context above).
Similarly in the UK, though only a small minority of British voters elected the so-called government last July, the primary concern of Labour supporters was the cost of living, given that families are continuing to struggle with comparatively dwindling incomes in the face of rapidly escalating prices. What they got was a government led by Prime Minister Kier Starmer—evidently an active member of a deep state policy think tank, the vaunted Trilateral Commission.
Under Trilateralist Starmer, the Labour government’s obvious and unsurprising policy is to exacerbate the cost-of-living crisis by targeting the most vulnerable—the sick and the disabled—by cutting their benefits while simultaneously massively increasing defence spending. This one-two punch intentionally diverts UK taxpayers’ money away from the people who deserve support to the least-deserving of all: arms manufacturers and their beneficial shareholders.
This is what government does—always, without fail. It’s standard practice. Government does not serve the people. The idea that it does is absurd. Government exploits the people on behalf of the oligarchs who often have a hand in creating the system of rulership—of the rulers and the ruled. Voting for the next government in the hope that something will change is beyond futile; it borders on delusion.
Why do oligarchs want to control other people? What is it about this cluster of immensely wealthy and often prominent individuals that makes them crave authority over our lives? Is it megalomania? Is it psychopathy? Are they so used to ordering people around that it feels natural and normal and right to them? Or perhaps dictator-like control is a family tradition they have inherited? Maybe none of these reasons apply. Maybe a combination of them do. Who knows?
One thing, however, is abundantly clear: Controlling the peons beneath them (as they regard us) really matters to oligarchs. It is virtually an obsession. They spend billions on propagandizing us. They tirelessly invest in ever-more-sophisticated control mechanisms. If there is any psychology driving their obsessions, it seems to be based on insecurity rather than on confidence. The need to coerce, manipulate, deceive, or violently assault the populace stem from fear of the masses—from terror of the potential power residing in large numbers of people who no longer believe the narratives they are given.
We've been in deep shit for awhile. Nothing is going to change that until that shit bomb explodes and we all get sprayed. It's inevitable, the only question is how much more shit can the Democrats drop on the pile before it rapidly self disassembles. The Democrats will resist flushing their work over the years at any cost.This is absolutely true ..... If the Supreme Court fails to stop it we are in deep shit.
Denying it happened in the past, and is happening currently is done solely to hide the fact we have/use it ourselves. It's discussed in some of the PYOPS links I've posted in the past. They can do everything from behavioral modification to causing physical injury depending on the tuning and frequencies of the attack.
Has anyone published the frequency that makes one lose control of their bowels? My copy of the anarchist cookbook seems to be a bit dated...Denying it happened in the past, and is happening currently is done solely to hide the fact we have/use it ourselves. It's discussed in some of the PYOPS links I've posted in the past. They can do everything from behavioral modification to causing physical injury depending on the tuning and frequencies of the attack.
The things we're doing with sound these days is stunning.Some sound waves are inaudible up to 35 feet from the source, but once the wave forms it can be overwhelming dependimg on the intent. We're also capable of making every person in a room hear something different. A message or signal can target 1 person in a crowd. In the audio world they're looking at letting each passenger in a car hear their own audio choice. Music is still rough due to the complexity and the Haas effect (how we echo locate sound sources) but they're working on it.
Oh yeah, I have some some stuff in my field interrogation kit that will wreck you if you have food hearing. Projectile vomiting and diarrhea allng with extreme hearing damage.Has anyone published the frequency that makes one lose control of their bowels? My copy of the anarchist cookbook seems to be a bit dated...
Building 7 wtc might finally get revealed.... nawww hell no. Just more bs distractions that wont be shown.
![]()
GLOBAL BOMBSHELL: The Republican-Led US Senate To Officially Investigate The Controlled Demolition Of Building 7 On 9/11
The Premeditated Destruction Of Building 7 Constitutes The Ultimate Smoking Gun, Definitively Proving 100% That 9/11 Was A Deep State Inside Job Chairman Of The Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Senator Ron Johnson Is Spearheading The Public Effort To Reveal The Horrific Truth That Is...madmaxworld.tv
Watch video. Nothing will come of it. Nada. Prove me wrong.
Just more worthless fucking investigations. Oh oh look we got them now bs.
ROFL
This was known for years.
9/11 Suspects (Full Documentary | 2016) | The Corbett Report
corbettreport.com
Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money | The Corbett Report
corbettreport.com
9/11 Gave us the Patriot Act and the TSA and completely destroyed the 4th amendment.
US became a Police State after that with nuts being tightened little by little ever since and with Biometric ID coming your way the nuts will be sealed tight for a long time.
There it is again.When it comes to discussions about world population, most will say there are too many people ..... Musk thinks the problem is exactly the opposite ...... Musk is most likely to be right.