Back to the topic of the SBMS0 I recently learned became aware that while the SBMS0
has low temperature protection, charging and discharging cannot be set or controlled separately which significantly limits its utility.
In his usual style, Dacian has a well reasoned but narrow and rigid argument as to why low temp disconnect is not the proper way to solve the predicament of LFP in low temps (he feels avoiding low temps, insulating, and/or heating are better solutions). While I don't disagree with his logic (actually I was fairly swayed by it), I don't think his argument eliminates the usefulness of low temp disconnect as a safety measure, and protection
layer. This will not be a problem for many people, but I do hope this is addressed in future iterations of the SBMS0.
Some relevant info
here and also
in this thread (read the second link if you want to here Dacian's reasoning).