I acknowledge lawyers can preempt people with open bias from a jury. What I disagree with is the notion that there is any equivalency between the views and posts of MurphyGuy and BMcl. There is nothing extreme about MurphyGuy's views or my views. My posts are backed by actual science and studies, boring stuff, and are in accordance with the advice of professional medical associations and counterparts of the CDC and FDA throughout the western world. Because my views oppose an extremist does not make us both extremists. Get it?You obviously fail to understand how the legal system works as well as bias. They both are on the extremes, as are you, which makes your disagreeing irrelevant as well.
Furthermore, anyone with this opinion is trash. As such I have relegated you to the trash pile and as far as I am concerned you opinions and speech have no meaningful value in civil or any other discourse.