Sodium or solid state?Toyota has them. Unknown if it is a patented process that will limit others from making them or requiring a license to do so.
"Toyota's solid-state batteries are a potential game-changer for electric vehicles (EVs), and the company is aiming to mass produce them by 2027 or 2028"
Ya, I went off a tangent. Patent for Cathode on Sodium IonSodium or solid state?
You not kidding:They're in production, but everything produced goes to the first customers which include car manufacturers and energy storage systems. There are no real sources of cells yet as we have them with LFP today: that needs a ramp-up of production. The main issue is that a lot of inverters ad charge controllers don't support the voltage range, which in turn meant that the sources for cells that were there (Docan had some for example) now essentially dried up because no one bought them.
LFP has been dropping in price so much as well, which doesn't help since Sodium now is more expensive (since the scale isn't there yet).
It is too late for me
[Fixed the URL for you]The more I read the more I wonder if I should wait for sodium batteries
turbo encabulator
You are just the messenger but I have a hard time comprehending this "More resistance at the same current creates more heat"internal resistance of sodium ion batteries is slightly higher than that of lithium batteries, resulting in less instantaneous heat generation
Years ago we had some parts made by a company in Finland.I'm happy to learn they are tolerant of acupuncture. That means they should work just fine with a turbo encabulator.
I _think_ they are trying to say that the higher internal resistance is a _good_ thing because it limits the short-circuit current, but yeah, it makes no sense and is only there to try to convince the clueless that there's a lot of science, therefore it's good.You are just the messenger but I have a hard time comprehending this "More resistance at the same current creates more heat"
Well, he actually implied the opposite, so I think both of you might be trolling because P=i^2*R. EDIT: I re read and realized you were saying "in light of this fact". My bad!You are just the messenger but I have a hard time comprehending this "More resistance at the same current creates more heat"
TRUE BUT, isn't that P the heat in watts? higher internal resistance leads to more heat production due to energy loss as current flows through the batteryWell, he actually implied the opposite, so I think both of you might be trolling because P=i^2*R.
I noted my blunder with an edit. It happened because I didn't insert the implied "because" in the middle of your sentence.TRUE BUT, isn't that P the heat in watts? higher internal resistance leads to more heat production due to energy loss as current flows through the battery