Kirk Bailey
New Member
Hi All,
I've got a SMA Data Manager M now working with my dual SI6048-US setup. In doing so I noticed that SMA uses different names for the SI parameters as downloaded from the Data Manager M, versus what is listed in the SI documentation. I contacted SMA but they apparently don't have a document that shows the mapping between the two sets of parameter names. Sooo, I took at a stab at making my own - see attached.
To do this I imported the results of a .CSV parameter download from the Data Manager M into a spreadsheet, and then did a bunch of editing. I deleted the information that was specific to my system, as well as the current parameter settings I'm using, and then added a couple of columns for what I hope is the matching original SI parameter number and name. Note that I did this by comparing the manual info to the spreadsheet descriptions, so please consider this an initial attampt that probably contains errors! I also didn't include a number of the parameters for which I didn't see an obvious match based on the spreadsheet descriptions.
Additions, corrections, and comments welcome!
Cheers,
Kirk Bailey
I've got a SMA Data Manager M now working with my dual SI6048-US setup. In doing so I noticed that SMA uses different names for the SI parameters as downloaded from the Data Manager M, versus what is listed in the SI documentation. I contacted SMA but they apparently don't have a document that shows the mapping between the two sets of parameter names. Sooo, I took at a stab at making my own - see attached.
To do this I imported the results of a .CSV parameter download from the Data Manager M into a spreadsheet, and then did a bunch of editing. I deleted the information that was specific to my system, as well as the current parameter settings I'm using, and then added a couple of columns for what I hope is the matching original SI parameter number and name. Note that I did this by comparing the manual info to the spreadsheet descriptions, so please consider this an initial attampt that probably contains errors! I also didn't include a number of the parameters for which I didn't see an obvious match based on the spreadsheet descriptions.
Additions, corrections, and comments welcome!
Cheers,
Kirk Bailey