Mine is small. But I'm happy with it.Alright kids.
You both have big PPs, equal stream height and distance, and your moms say you're both handsome.
Mine is small. But I'm happy with it.Alright kids.
You both have big PPs, equal stream height and distance, and your moms say you're both handsome.
I think you are hyper-sensitive, I did not attack your degree but rather just asked what I was it because the degree doesn't seem to specify that.Why? You're already questioning it's existence to the point where you tried to insinuate that the school doesn't even have a science program. I tune people like that out. If you disagree with my findings about the batteries, that's fine. But don't attack my education.
I would add too that a general mech E degree doesn't specialize in anything and means nothing about qualifications in a given field without years of work experience related to it.I think you are hyper-sensitive, I did not attack your degree but rather just asked what I was it because the degree doesn't seem to specify that.
Seems to me like the thread should be considered solved at this point to avoid further phallus waving.Ya got it...!
The thing is that the question of "Which degree do you have so we can determine what your expertise is" wasn't asked. What was said and implied was "hey, your school doesn't even offer the program that you supposedly earned a degree in", which if true would be a "gotcha" moment that I wasn't authentic. But it was said without even doing a basic check to see if it was even true, which I showed obviously wasn't true. That's what I have a problem with.I would add too that a general mech E degree doesn't specialize in anything and means nothing about qualifications in a given field without years of work experience related to it.
Anyone with an education should understand this already.
You come out with enough knowledge to pick a field and start learning, but are not an expert on anything they teach, even if you specialized, until a masters level at minimum and most of them will agree by that point that they still have much I learn.
So like in my case I'm in plastic injection molding.
I know a bit about designing and specifying equipment, sizing electrical/pnuematic/hydraulic/heat loads and storage capacity, heat transfer, turbulent flow, non-newtonian fluids, and most of all plastic injection processing....
But I am by no means an expert at anything other than the actual melt processing (and I'd be a fool to claim I'm the authority on the matter), despite my generalized education on all of those things.
When I need an expert, I call one who gets paid very well to be that expert.
Somewhat back to the point, even an EE would be much better suited for the discussion but it's quite possible that an accomplished electrical engineer may even have zero experience on this exact specific topic of batteries.
So even further to the point, it's not exactly an invalid question to ask if one is specialized in the field of energy storage because "engineering degree", while a respectable accomplishment of course, does not mean much in its own right when it comes to a specific topic.
As before, I know a little about a lot of things. But I'm not an expert on 99% of the things I've dabbled in.
And at the end of the day nobody is posting anything technical enough to warrant this stupid debate about education in the first place. What has been posted is little more than an opinion piece, followed up by opinions, and a whole bunch of chest beating about how that opinion is better.
There never was any "phallus" waving. People are also confusing parallel strings with parallel cells. But I'm done arguing. It isn't worth it.Seems to me like the thread should be considered solved at this point to avoid further phallus waving.
Praise be unto the flying spaghetti monster.Amen
My name isn’t Mark. I already terminated my discussion with you earlier and the fact that you can’t even respect someone enough to get their name right shows that I was right to terminate. As I said earlier, I gain no benefit from changing your mind. I don’t make any money from it, I’m not selling anything. So again, believe what you want. It’s won’t change my life. This particular part of the discussion wasn’t even involving you. You didn’t incorrectly say that my school didn’t offer the program that I earned my degree in. Someone else did.There was no phallus waving. There was some degree waving and it was hilarious. I am perfectly willing to grant that Mark has a degree. That doesn't mean anything to me in regards to this discussion. As I said earlier, I have known folks with degrees who knew nothing and folks without who were very knowledgeable. Let's forget the degrees. As the Borg would say, degrees are irrelevant.
As a topic for discussion on a DIY solar site, this is a good and important one. Mark, you have yet to post anything supporting your claims. I for one am still open to evidence. Nor have you answered any of the points that have been brought up. You haven't even told us the details of your experiments.
So Mark, what happens in this situation: You put two lead batteries in parallel. One is only capable of reaching 1.22 SG. The other is capable of reaching 1.28. When charging them, when you get to max charge voltage, what will be happening to the older battery? Then, after the sun has gone down, the new battery has a higher level of charge then the old battery. What happens to its level of charge? Then somebody fires up a heavy load. Maybe some midnight welding. Which battery is providing more of the power?
As I said earlier, I have seen this aging process in action on multiple occasions. At first the new battery will read higher, for a couple or few weeks. Then it will read the same as the rest of the bank. At that point if taken out of the bank and charged it will manage to charge fully. If left in the bank longer, for a few months, it will no longer be able to charge fully and will charge to the same extent as the average of the bank. I have seen and measured it.
My name isn’t Mark. I already terminated my discussion with you earlier and the fact that you can’t even respect someone enough to get their name right shows that I was right to terminate. As I said earlier, I gain no benefit from changing your mind. I don’t make any money from it, I’m not selling anything. So again, believe what you want. It’s won’t change my life. This particular part of the discussion wasn’t even involving you. You didn’t incorrectly say that my school didn’t offer the program that I earned my degree in. Someone else did.
I did discuss the topic presented. Just because you disagree doesn’t make me “not discussing the topic”. People are also conflating the issue of “parallel STRINGS” and “parallel CELLS” in a single string. My argument is about parallel cells in a single string. But people keep arguing about “sets” and “strings” and such that aren’t matching what I’m talking about.I beg your pardon for getting your name wrong. My intent was to show respect by using your name.
However, yet again you make no logical argument. You bring no evidence to the table. You don't discuss the arguments that have been presented. You simply continue to maintain you are right.
Have you considered that the possible benefit you might gain is learning something, that you just might possibly be wrong? I have considered that possibility for myself and if you bring the slightest shred of evidence I will consider it with an open mind.
Not taking sides. So helping my cheap old "parallel FLA marine's" is impossible?
I'm no expert but from everything I've read about adding to my Gel battery bank I'd say it's not a good idea to add new lead to old.Not taking sides. So helping my cheap old "parallel FLA marine's" is impossible?
My position is that it is very possible. But obviously others are disagreeing with me. My findings are that two (or more) paralleled cells will function as a single cell. If there is a “weaker” cell in that parallel “block”, then the “stronger” cell will simply “do more of the work”, but less than if the cell were by itself and not paralleled with another cell. But again, people are disagreeing with me about that.Not taking sides. So helping my cheap old "parallel FLA marine's" is impossible?
I’m going to do a set of engineering drawings and submit it to Rolls/Dekka/several manufacturers and ask if they see a problem and would warranty their cells in that configuration. Hopefully I will get a clear “no way” or “we see no problem” and “yes, we would warranty the cells”.You have been asserting your position but not explaining why you think it to be true.
As far as I know, alkaline batteries are the only common type of batteries that are made of a single cell. All of the other batteries we use are series of cells. With lead, each cell is 2V and usually are manufactured such that there are 3 or 6 cells in series. There are exceptions, fork lift batteries can be 2V and I think are usually placed in series only but I haven't worked with them much.
Perhaps define what you mean by parallel strings and parallel cells with examples of each.
That would be great! I really am curious as to the truth of the matter. Please post the drawing here so we can look at it. We may all be talking at cross purposes.I’m going to do a set of engineering drawings and submit it to Rolls/Dekka/several manufacturers and ask if they see a problem and would warranty their cells in that configuration. Hopefully I will get a clear “no way” or “we see no problem” and “yes, we would warranty the cells”.
Yes. So in doing more of the work, it ages until it is at the same point as its neighbor, when they both start doing equal work. Work ages a cell. More work ages it more. We also run into problems in the charge side of the cycle. One battery has reached as full of a charge as it can. The other is still charging. So the weak cell boils. Once charge is complete for the day, even if there is no load, the stronger battery will attempt to charge the weaker battery because the charge seeks to reach balance. Since the weak battery can't accept more charge the energy is wasted as heat. Now the stronger battery sits over night at a lowered state of charge until the next charging cycle begins. This of course leads to increased sulfation, one of the primary aging factors of lead batteries.My findings are that two (or more) paralleled cells will function as a single cell. If there is a “weaker” cell in that parallel “block”, then the “stronger” cell will simply “do more of the work”, but less than if the cell were by itself and not paralleled with another cell.
"more work ages the cell" so according to you (and what I've been saying) less work ages the cell less. So how is it worse to have two cells doing less work than having one cell doing all the work?That would be great! I really am curious as to the truth of the matter. Please post the drawing here so we can look at it. We may all be talking at cross purposes.
Yes. So in doing more of the work, it ages until it is at the same point as its neighbor, when they both start doing equal work. Work ages a cell. More work ages it more. We also run into problems in the charge side of the cycle. One battery has reached as full of a charge as it can. The other is still charging. So the weak cell boils. Once charge is complete for the day, even if there is no load, the stronger battery will attempt to charge the weaker battery because the charge seeks to reach balance. Since the weak battery can't accept more charge the energy is wasted as heat. Now the stronger battery sits over night at a lowered state of charge until the next charging cycle begins. This of course leads to increased sulfation, one of the primary aging factors of lead batteries.
"more work ages the cell" so according to you (and what I've been saying) less work ages the cell less. So how is it worse to have two cells doing less work than having one cell doing all the work?
"We also run into problems in the charge side...." This is the fundamental misunderstanding. One cell will not be at a lower state of charge. Just like during discharge, one cell is doing "more work", the same is true during charging. The "stronger" cell will be taking more of the charge current. You can stop the charge at any given point and the SOCs of both cells will be roughly the same.