Okay well I've had my coffee since I last answered so here's my thoughtsVerified with two multimeters. Second one is a Klein. Do not own a fluke
good point as well. not to mention the cable might be under sizedAlso, poor connections, either bad crimps or incorrect torque, will affect bms voltage readings.
Classic sense lead failure. Most likely a broken conductor with only a single strand making contact.There is one cell I am watching closely. The multimeter on the battery terminals and the positive and negative metal ring terminals (cell 8) both read 3.22 v. The BMS reading of 2.707 when the load test is turned on. If I turn the load off, the BMS and multimeter readings match. What happens over time is that cell 8 drops and stops the bms.
Yesterday I checked and reattached the positive and negative leads on cell 8. The readings on the BMS did not change.
Not sure if this is related. On three occasions, the 180w tester stated the test was done. The first time, I hit start again and it ran for over 98 amps. It then stopped twice more at about 2 amps. After the third time I restarted as before. When I checked the values of the BMS the last time, all of a sudden they were balanced and closely matched the multimeter settings.
Later the values adjusted back to the 8 cell low as before. If I stop the test the values go back to expected.
I am beginning to suspect a faulty positive lead from Cell 8. Initially the values are as expected when the test begins. If somehow the crimp connection is not optimum then micro drops in current may be leading to improper values in the BMS values.
I crimped the connection again to make sure it was secure.
I did isolate this cell and checked the voltage across the bms leads at the umbilical connectors and the voltage reading is as expected. However, the bms seems to be reading the wrong voltage. Might this be a faulty crimp that does not show up under load? Or a faulty bms?
Thoughts?
If the cell is bad, it will rapidly drop voltage under load, and recover when load is removed.Ok. I figured this was a lead problem. Then I rotated the cell to position 6 and resumed the test. Turns out it is the cell.
What I can not figure out is that once I start the test it drops down to 2.5 per the bms and shuts down the bms. If I then isolate the cell it reads 3.19 volts
The order needs to be, battery terminal, buss bar, sense lead, nut. You absolutely DO NOT want anything between the buss bar and the battery terminal.View attachment 76850
Ok. Made a simple change that made all the difference. I stopped the test last night and gave the cells (and my brain as well) a good rest.
This morning I added these BMS leads under the bus bar where it contacts the battery. This is for the 10mm battery where I needed to dremmel the bus bar to fit. The thinking is that the surface contact may have been compromised in the downstream battery. This was confirmed during my initial test this morning.
So far it has been running 90 minutes and (knock on wood) all battery levels are stable in relationship to each other.
I am so impressed by this that I am going to trial copper washers between the studs and bus bars. I understand that these are different metals but will not be pulling high amps.