A relay has 2 sides to it. The control side, where the 2 leads do have power on them, and the controlled side, where the 2 leads have nothing on them unless you put the relay to good use. The green/orange connector shown in the photo has the 6 pairs for the 6 relays that are used to control the various loads and chargers. The connect has the controlled side, thus a female type of connector is poor. What is going to be plugged into that connector is the controlling side of another relay that is in the inverter, or the DC/DC converter, or the charger, or your whole battery disconnect relay. The controlling side of those relays are indeed powered, and thus a naked wire (male) is a poor choice to stuff into the female socket on the BMS.
So it's not relays, it's logic inputs on other devices. Usually such inputs are protected but to be safe, yes, it would be a good idea to use another type of connector
I thought you were saying that you were measuring individual cell SoC. I am concluding that I misinterpreted you.
I am. Current is the same in every cell as they are in series. So as I have the current and each cell voltage I can calculate each cell SoC in addition to the whole pack SoC.
What does a "SoC based balancer" mean?
You use SoC instead of voltage as your data input for the balancing logic. It allows you to be able to balance the cells all the time instead of only in the knee.
Ummmm, didn't I say I will charge to say N%? Isn't that exactly leaving (100-N)% unused? Yes, I have no intention of attempting to regularly get 280Ah from my 280Ah battery. Why would anyone size their pack so perfectly that they are routinely using 100% of the rated capacity? And if so, why in hell not get another 20% bigger battery and stop at 10% and 90% so you don't waste it as fast as your laptop and phone batteries are wasted (2-3 yrs)?
Yes, of course, but you talked about avoiding the knees. If you want to stay in the flat part only it'll reduce the usable capacity a lot for not much more cycles, so I was advising to not do that to that extreme and just reduce it by 5-10 % on each end, as more than that leads to very poor ROI.
And, as @snoobler said, they are NMC cells who have a higher degradation per cycle than LFP cells.
If we stop charging at, say, 90%, are we avoiding the pressure all together? Wouldn't that be even better?
My guess is that the expansion/SoC relationship is somewhat linear so stopping the charge at a lower SoC will not be super useful. But it's just an educated guess so an experiment will answer the question for sure
It’s not ideal, the lower charge rate you can average- the better. It’s better to charge at 1amp for an hour than it is to charge at 60amps for a minute.
If at that point your charge controller is pumping 60amps into your pack it won’t be possible to bleed current from the errant cell.
I agree
They try to balance at this point and overheat bypass resistors
Then I'd say the dump resistors are undersized. A proper design would ensure the resistors can handle the balancing indefinitely.